search for: pollyscopinfo

...parison with the latest patch >>> having gone into Polly. >> >> Yes, you can view the comparison on: >>      http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/26?compare_to=25&baseline=25 > >I am slightly confused. What are we comparing here? It seems we compare  >a PollyScopInfo run with a PollyDependences run (same source code?) and  >the Dependences run shows compile time speedup over ScopInfo? This is  >surprising. In fact, there are three runs: pollyOpt (run id = 18): the baseline of Polly  pollyScopInfo (run id = 25): Polly with the ScopInfo patch r187728 that...

...gt;>> having gone into Polly. >>> >>> Yes, you can view the comparison on: >>> http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/26?compare_to=25&baseline=25 >> >> I am slightly confused. What are we comparing here? It seems we compare >> a PollyScopInfo run with a PollyDependences run (same source code?) and >> the Dependences run shows compile time speedup over ScopInfo? This is >> surprising. > > In fact, there are three runs: > > pollyOpt (run id = 18): the baseline of Polly > pollyScopInfo (run id = 25): Polly with t...

...ood to get an up-to-date comparison with the latest patch >> having gone into Polly. > > Yes, you can view the comparison on: > http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/26?compare_to=25&baseline=25 I am slightly confused. What are we comparing here? It seems we compare a PollyScopInfo run with a PollyDependences run (same source code?) and the Dependences run shows compile time speedup over ScopInfo? This is surprising. The numbers rather suggest that those are two Dependences runs the first without the patch applied the second with. If this is the case, why does the page sa...

At 2013-08-08 22:28:33,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 08/08/2013 01:29 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> >> I have summarized the top 10 compiler passes for Polly when compiling LLVM test-ssuite. Results can be viewed on: >>