Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "pollynogen".
2013 Aug 11
2
[LLVMdev] [FastPolly]: Update of Polly's performance on LLVM test-suite
...ly's performance on LLVM test-suite with latest LLVM (r188054) and Polly (r187981). Results can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000.
There are mainly five new tests and each test is run with 10 samples:
clang (run id = 27): clang -O3
pollyBasic (run id = 28): clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so
pollyNoGen (run id = 29): pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none -mllvm -polly-code-generator=none
pollyNoOpt (run id = 30): pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none
pollyOpt (run id = 31): pollycc -O3
Here is the performance comparison for the newest Polly:
http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nt...
2013 Aug 09
0
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Summary of some expensive compiler passes, especially PollyDependence
...e patch file.
I see. I did not realize that all those runs have been performed with
'-O3 -polly'. Now it makes sense.
If you happen to not use the tester machine right now, it would be
interesting to schedule runs that give us the current state of Polly
performance. Meaning pollyBasic, pollyNoGen, pollyNoOpt and pollyOpt for
the latest version of Polly.
Cheers,
Tobi
2013 Aug 11
0
[LLVMdev] [FastPolly]: Update of Polly's performance on LLVM test-suite
...r188054) and Polly (r187981). Results can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000.
Hi Star Tan,
thanks for the update.
> There are mainly five new tests and each test is run with 10 samples:
> clang (run id = 27): clang -O3
> pollyBasic (run id = 28): clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so
> pollyNoGen (run id = 29): pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none -mllvm -polly-code-generator=none
> pollyNoOpt (run id = 30): pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none
> pollyOpt (run id = 31): pollycc -O3
>
>
> Here is the performance comparison for the newest Polly:
> http://188...
2013 Aug 09
2
[LLVMdev] [Polly] Summary of some expensive compiler passes, especially PollyDependence
At 2013-08-09 10:20:46,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:>On 08/08/2013 06:27 PM, Star Tan wrote:
>> At 2013-08-08 22:28:33,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2013 01:29 AM, Star Tan wrote:
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>>
2013 Aug 12
1
[LLVMdev] [FastPolly]: Update of Polly's performance on LLVM test-suite
...ts can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000.
>
>Hi Star Tan,
>
>thanks for the update.
>
>> There are mainly five new tests and each test is run with 10 samples:
>> clang (run id = 27): clang -O3
>> pollyBasic (run id = 28): clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so
>> pollyNoGen (run id = 29): pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none -mllvm -polly-code-generator=none
>> pollyNoOpt (run id = 30): pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none
>> pollyOpt (run id = 31): pollycc -O3
> >
>>
>> Here is the performance comparison for the newest Polly:...