search for: pollylabs

...schedulers may be developed as well. >> >> Even though some developers in the LLVM community already have a >> background in polyhedral-modeling techniques, the Polly developers >> have developed, and are still developing, extensive tutorials on this >> topic http://pollylabs.org/education.htmland especially >> http://playground.pollylabs.org <http://playground.pollylabs.org/>. >> >> Finally, let me highlight a few ongoing development efforts in Polly >> that are potentially relevant to this discussion. Polly’s loop >> analysis is...

...> target-specific, loop schedulers may be developed as well. Even though some > developers in the LLVM community already have a background in > polyhedral-modeling techniques, the Polly developers have developed, and > are still developing, extensive tutorials on this topic > http://pollylabs.org/education.html <http://pollylabs.org/education.html> > and especially http://playground.pollylabs.org > <http://playground.pollylabs.org/>. Finally, let me highlight a few ongoing > development efforts in Polly that are potentially relevant to this > discussion. Polly’s...

...get-specific, loop schedulers may be developed as well. Even though some developers in the LLVM community already have a background in polyhedral-modeling techniques, the Polly developers have developed, and are still developing, extensive tutorials on this topic http://pollylabs.org/education.htmland especially http://playground.pollylabs.org. Finally, let me highlight a few ongoing development efforts in Polly that are potentially relevant to this discussion. Polly’s loop analysis is sound and technically superior to what’s in LLVM currently (...

...arget-specific, loop schedulers may be developed as well. >>> >>> Even though some developers in the LLVM community already have a background in polyhedral-modeling techniques, the Polly developers have developed, and are still developing, extensive tutorials on this topic http://pollylabs.org/education.html <http://pollylabs.org/education.html> and especially http://playground.pollylabs.org <http://playground.pollylabs.org/>. >>> >>> Finally, let me highlight a few ongoing development efforts in Polly that are potentially relevant to this discussion....

...t; > > > > Even though some developers in the LLVM community already have a > > background in polyhedral-modeling techniques, the Polly developers have > > developed, and are still developing, extensive tutorials on this topic > > http://pollylabs.org/education.htmland especially > > http://playground.pollylabs.org. > > > > > > Finally, let me highlight a few ongoing development efforts in Polly > > that are potentially relevant to this discussion. Polly’s loop analysis > >...

...M-specific, or even target-specific, loop schedulers may be developed as well. Even though some developers in the LLVM community already have a background in polyhedral-modeling techniques, the Polly developers have developed, and are still developing, extensive tutorials on this topic http://pollylabs.org/education.htmland especially http://playground.pollylabs.org. Finally, let me highlight a few ongoing development efforts in Polly that are potentially relevant to this discussion. Polly’s loop analysis is sound and technically superior to what’s in LLVM currently (i.e. in LoopAccessAnaly...

...eld by participants are welcome (please contact us). # Who: - Anybody interested - - ETH students and staff - LLVM developers and enthusiasts external to ETH # When: 10.01.2018, 19:00 # Where: CAB E 72, ETH Zurich # Earlier Socials We have videos of earlier socials available at: http://pollylabs.org/llvm-social-zurich.html Best, Tobias

[CC bollu, mferguson, shil] Am Do., 23. Mai 2019 um 17:13 Uhr schrieb Bardia Mahjour < bmahjour at ca.ibm.com>: > Thanks David and Michael for the clarification. > > I think I understand the rational behind those checks in delinearization > now. > > > Some other languages have stronger guarantees about their array > dimensions accesses being in range. But this being

...ay be developed as well. > > > > > > Even though some developers in the LLVM community already have a > > background in polyhedral-modeling techniques, the Polly developers > > have developed, and are still developing, extensive tutorials on this > > topic http://pollylabs.org/education.htmland especially > > http://playground.pollylabs.org. > > > > > > Finally, let me highlight a few ongoing development efforts in Polly > > that are potentially relevant to this discussion. Polly’s loop > > analysis is sound and technically superio...

...ific, loop > schedulers may be developed as well. > > > Even though some developers in the LLVM community already have a background > in polyhedral-modeling techniques, the Polly developers have developed, and > are still developing, extensive tutorials on this topic > http://pollylabs.org/education.htmland especially > http://playground.pollylabs.org. > > > Finally, let me highlight a few ongoing development efforts in Polly that > are potentially relevant to this discussion. Polly’s loop analysis is sound > and technically superior to what’s in LLVM currentl...

...h back into Polly. > Once that happens researchers will less likely commit (bigger) changes > back to the community but only publish their code and results. I think > that is a common way of doing things and Polly is (so far) an exception > due to its unique situation. Indeed Polly and PollyLabs in general are rather unique. I would claim that Polly and isl are -- in large parts -- developed to a standard that matches LLVM. We certainly have more experimental areas but the extend we test Polly and isl every day is clearly beyond a normal research project. Only this kind of maturity allows...

Hi Hal, On 09/22, Hal Finkel wrote: > Hi, Johannes, > > Thanks for writing this. I certainly think you have the right idea in terms > of the desired end state and modular design. Thanks for the feedback! > On 09/19/2017 07:33 PM, Johannes Doerfert wrote: > >Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael, and others, > > > >I'd like to add my view (and a proposal) to this

Hi, Johannes, Thanks for writing this. I certainly think you have the right idea in terms of the desired end state and modular design. On 09/19/2017 07:33 PM, Johannes Doerfert wrote: > Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael, and others, > > I'd like to add my view (and a proposal) to this discussion and I > apologize directly for doing this so late*. I also want to apologize > because this