Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "pollybench".
Did you mean:
polybench
2016 Jun 22
2
[GSoC 2016] Enabling Polyhedral Optimizations in Julia - Midterm Report
Dear Community,
in an earlier post, students working on LLVM were asked to provide a short
report on
their GSoC project. in the following I want to give an overview on the
current status of my
GSoC project and outline my next planned activities. Since my mentoring
organization is Julia,
I also send this to the according mailing list.
*1. Activities so far:*
As described in my proposal [1], I
2016 Oct 08
2
[test-suite] making the test-suite succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"
...trying to heavily modify every
> benchmark that does floating-point computation, as in proposal 2,
> does not seem to scale well, and can't always be done regardless.
>
> We can make some effort to reduce the size of the problems being
> computed by some of the benchmarks (e.g. pollybench); I think that
> is reasonable and will help with the extra space requirements. That
> having been said, functionally speaking, our test suite is at least
> an order of magnitude too small, and so my sympathy is somewhat
> limited. We're going to have to find a way to execute the te...
2016 Oct 08
3
[test-suite] making the test-suite succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"
Hi,
I would like to provide a summary of the different proposals on how to
fix the test-suite to make it succeed when specifying extra CFLAGS
"-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on". I would like to expose the issue and
proposed ways to fix it to other potential reviewers that could
provide extra feedback. We also need to decide which proposal (or
combination of) to implement and
2016 Oct 08
3
[test-suite] making the test-suite succeed with "-Ofast" and "-ffp-contract=on"
...the business of trying to heavily modify every benchmark that does floating-point computation, as in proposal 2, does not seem to scale well, and can't always be done regardless.
>
> We can make some effort to reduce the size of the problems being computed by some of the benchmarks (e.g. pollybench); I think that is reasonable and will help with the extra space requirements. That having been said, functionally speaking, our test suite is at least an order of magnitude too small, and so my sympathy is somewhat limited. We're going to have to find a way to execute the test suite in stages o...
2017 Sep 22
0
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
Hi Hal,
On 09/21, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev wrote:
>
> On 09/12/2017 10:26 PM, Gerolf Hoflehner wrote:
> >
> >
> >>On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:47 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev
> >><llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>On 09/11/2017 12:26 PM, Adam Nemet wrote:
> >>>Hi Hal,
2017 Sep 22
4
[RFC] Polly Status and Integration
On 09/12/2017 10:26 PM, Gerolf Hoflehner wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 11, 2017, at 10:47 PM, Hal Finkel via llvm-dev
>> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 09/11/2017 12:26 PM, Adam Nemet wrote:
>>> Hi Hal, Tobias, Michael and others,
>>> *...*
>>>
>>> One thing that I’d