search for: pollybasic

Hi all, I have evaluated Polly's performance on LLVM test-suite with latest LLVM (r188054) and Polly (r187981).  Results can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000. There are mainly five new tests and each test is run with 10 samples: clang (run id = 27):  clang -O3 pollyBasic (run id = 28):  clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so pollyNoGen (run id = 29):  pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none -mllvm -polly-code-generator=none pollyNoOpt (run id = 30):  pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none pollyOpt (run id = 31):  pollycc -O3 Here is the performance comparison for the new...

...copDependence patch file. I see. I did not realize that all those runs have been performed with '-O3 -polly'. Now it makes sense. If you happen to not use the tester machine right now, it would be interesting to schedule runs that give us the current state of Polly performance. Meaning pollyBasic, pollyNoGen, pollyNoOpt and pollyOpt for the latest version of Polly. Cheers, Tobi

...Polly's performance on LLVM test-suite with latest LLVM (r188054) and Polly (r187981). Results can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000. Hi Star Tan, thanks for the update. > There are mainly five new tests and each test is run with 10 samples: > clang (run id = 27): clang -O3 > pollyBasic (run id = 28): clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so > pollyNoGen (run id = 29): pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none -mllvm -polly-code-generator=none > pollyNoOpt (run id = 30): pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none > pollyOpt (run id = 31): pollycc -O3 > > > Here is the perf...

At 2013-08-09 10:20:46,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote:>On 08/08/2013 06:27 PM, Star Tan wrote: >> At 2013-08-08 22:28:33,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>> On 08/08/2013 01:29 AM, Star Tan wrote: >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>>

Hello all, I have evaluated the compile-time and execution-time performance of Polly canonicalization passes. Details can be referred to http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/recent_activity. There are four runs: pollyBasic (run 45): clang -O3 -Xclang -load -Xclang LLVMPolly.so pollyNoGenSCEV (run 44): clang -O3 -Xclang -load -Xclang LLVMPolly.so -mllvm -polly -mllvm -polly-codegen-scev pollyNoGenSCEV_1comb (run 46): same option as pollyNoGenSCEV but remove the first "InstructionCombining" canonicalization p...

At 2013-09-09 13:07:07,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >On 09/09/2013 05:18 AM, Star Tan wrote: >> >> At 2013-09-09 05:52:35,"Tobias Grosser" <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> >>> On 09/08/2013 08:03 PM, Star Tan wrote: >>> Also, I wonder if your runs include the dependence analysis. If this is >>> the

...test-suite with latest LLVM (r188054) and Polly (r187981).  Results can be viewed on: http://188.40.87.11:8000. > >Hi Star Tan, > >thanks for the update. > >> There are mainly five new tests and each test is run with 10 samples: >> clang (run id = 27):  clang -O3 >> pollyBasic (run id = 28):  clang -O3 -load LLVMPolly.so >> pollyNoGen (run id = 29):  pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none -mllvm -polly-code-generator=none >> pollyNoOpt (run id = 30):  pollycc -O3 -mllvm -polly-optimizer=none >> pollyOpt (run id = 31):  pollycc -O3 > > >> &...

...2013-09-14 09:51:10,"Star Tan" <tanmx_star at yeah.net> wrote: Hello all, I have evaluated the compile-time and execution-time performance of Polly canonicalization passes. Details can be referred to http://188.40.87.11:8000/db_default/v4/nts/recent_activity. There are four runs: pollyBasic (run 45): clang -O3 -Xclang -load -Xclang LLVMPolly.so pollyNoGenSCEV (run 44): clang -O3 -Xclang -load -Xclang LLVMPolly.so -mllvm -polly -mllvm -polly-codegen-scev pollyNoGenSCEV_1comb (run 46): same option as pollyNoGenSCEV but remove the first "InstructionCombining" canonicalization p...