search for: polici

These patches update the example FLASK policy shipped with Xen and enable its build if the required tools are present. The third patch requires rerunning autoconf to update tools/configure. [PATCH 1/3] flask/policy: sort dom0 accesses [PATCH 2/3] flask/policy: rework policy build system [PATCH 3/3] tools/flask: add FLASK policy to build

Hi list, i currently have the following issue: I did a test upgrade to libvirt 1.1.4 and now i cannot create new snapshots which can be reverted. Following Situation: Virtualization: kvm Disktype: qcow2 qemu XML: <cpu mode='host-passthrough'> </cpu> Creating of snapshot: virsh snapshot-create-as <guest> <name> <description> --atomic Now i craete

Currently, enable/disable turbo mode on AMD is broken: $ xenpm enable-turbo-mode 0 <-- works and proper CPU MSR bit is set $ xenpm enable-turbo-mode 1 <-- silently broken, MSR bit not set Since ->turbo is per policy, when user requests to enable/disable turbo mode, we need to set the bit in all of the ->cpus that this policy affects. --- xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/powernow.c | 2

# HG changeset patch # User Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@amd.com> # Date 1345135101 -7200 # Node ID 85190245a94d9945b7656c971ba36f7d1eff5c19 # Parent 6d56e31fe1e1dc793379d662a36ff1731760eb0c AMD, powernow: Update P-state directly when _PSD''s CoordType is DOMAIN_COORD_TYPE_HW_ALL When _PSD''s CoordType is DOMAIN_COORD_TYPE_HW_ALL (i.e. shared_type is

On Wed, 4 May 2016, Nux! wrote: > Direct links > > https://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=29588#p132726 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=CVE-2016-3714 > > Mitigation: > > As a workaround the /etc/ImageMagick/policy.xml file can be edited to disable > processing of MVG, HTTPS, EPHEMERAL and MSL commands within image files,

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:42 AM Yedidyah Bar David <didi@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 12:28 AM wodel youchi <wodel.youchi@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Thanks for the help, I think I found the solution using this link : https://www.berrange.com/posts/2018/06/29/cpu-model-configuration-for-qemu-kvm-on-x86-hosts/ > > > >

struct cpufreq_policy, including a cpumask_t member, gets copied in cpufreq_limit_change(), cpufreq_add_cpu(), set_cpufreq_gov(), and set_cpufreq_para(). Make the member a cpumask_var_t, thus reducing the amount of data needing copying (particularly with large NR_CPUS). Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com> --- 2011-09-20.orig/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c 2011-10-12

...rce Updating Policy... User policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were encount ered: The processing of Group Policy failed. Windows could not apply the registry-base d policy settings for the Group Policy object LDAP://CN=User,CN={31B2F340-016D-1 1D2-945F-00C04FB984F9},CN=Policies,CN=System,DC=facility,DC=local. Group Policy settings will not be resolved until this event is resolved. View the event detai ls for more information on the file name and path that caused the failure. The following warnings were encountered during user policy processing: Windows failed to apply...

...39;t make any different. > > > > You wrote: "It looks to me that you have more GPO's in AD than you have on > > disk, ...". So, where are the "AD" versus "on disk" GPOs located? Is one of > > these locations /var/lib/samba/sysvol/hprs.local/policies/? I've rsync'ed the > > sysvol again. They are identical between the machines. > > > > Is this error possibly ignorable? I've checked and the rsync did copy the ACL > > attributes to the sysvol files and folders, so maybe this "ntacl sysvolreset" &gt...

...*Updating Policy ...The user policy could not be updated successfully. The following errors were found:Group Policy has not been processed. Windows was unable to apply registry-based policy settings to the LDAP Group Policy object: // CN = User, cn = {AFC65B84-867D-459D-9C0C-CBB3D511F086}, cn = policies, cn = system, DC = company,DC = com, DC = br. Group Policy settings will not be resolved until this event is resolved. View the event details for more information about the name and path of the file that caused the failure.The following warnings were encountered when processing user policies:Wind...

...s with the updated data (but that obviously defeats the point of using AJAX). For context, see snippets from the relevant files and the actual error message below. I feel like the error must be in my form_remote_tag call, but I''m not sure what it is. The relationship is Contract has many Policies. Thanks in advance for helping me sort this out. AJS ./app/views/contracts/show.rhtml === <div id="insurance-policies"> <h2>Insurance Policies</h2> <ul id="contract-insurance-policy-list"> <%= render :partial => "policy", :collectio...

Hi, is there anybody understanding HAL? I use CentOS 4 (RHEL 4) I need set specific mount options for USB flash disk. I found I can do it in /usr/share/hal/fdi/95userpolicy/storage-policy.fdi <?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><!-- -*- SGML -*- --> <deviceinfo version="0.2"> <device> <match key="volume.fstype"

...a part that I don't fully understand, maybe because, as you can read, I'm not a native English speaker. :-( I work with Spanish versions of Windows, so some terms can be inexact (is MY translation from Spanish Windows's terms to English, not Microsoft's one). I want to use complete policies, centralized in the server and applied depending of the user and the groups the user belongs to. I want to use those features that W2000 policies have and WinNT lacks, like making available particular applications to particular users and/or groups. After reading the document, I'm not sure of...

I have the following situation: a network with 30 Windows NT Server on different sites, 800 clients with Windows XP; I want to migrate to Samba instead of Windows 2003 Server, but I have the effort to manage group policies, domain policies and workstation policies on the XP Clients; is there a way to solve this without Active Directory e.g. Samba with LDAP?? Michael Ruzek

I am running Samba 2.2.3a and have my users logging into the 'samba domain'. My WinNT and WinXP users are working fine with roaming profiles and policies. My problem is my Win98 users. The logon script doesn't seem to be working, i.e. when I log onto a Win98 machine (logging into the domain), the logon script doesn't run. I have opened up the permissions to the logon script (for testing) and that doesn't seem to help, it's still...

This patch: * adds a C-based security policy translation tool to Xen (secpol_xml2bin) and removes the current Java security policy translator (Java dependencies). The C-based tool integrates into the Xen source tree build and install (using gnome libxml2 for XML parsing). See install.txt. * introduces security labels and related tools. Users can now use semantic-rich label names to put

Hi , Need to see if it is possible to do * Restrict local Storage use - Means how to restrict via group policy so that logon user in Samba AD will not be able to save any files on local storage of C: of D: drives . He can save on mapped Drive ( From Samba File Server ) . * Restrict web Access via any Browser via Group Policy We have used samba-4.8.3 and windows version is win

...ou configured automatic refresh, or manually applied the settings? https://dmulder.github.io/group-policy-book/policy-refresh.html If you don't have policy refresh enabled, then you wont see the policy applied to the machine. > 2. In GPME I do not see 'Computer Configuration > Policies > Administrative Templates > Samba > GNOME' when editing my policy with the default samba admx template that was loaded via 'samba-tool gpo admxload -U Administrator". Not quite sure how to go about debugging why its not there since the wiki just says that its with the defau...

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:35 PM, Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Dominique Ramaekers wrote: >> Dear Daniel, my XML's: >> >> Note: It seems I was to quick, the Windows 8.1 isn't fixed... >> >> Windows Server 2015 R2 >> >> <domain type='kvm' id='146'> >>

As suggested here: http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2004-October/015097.html I''ve run: adam@shrike:~$ /sbin/iptables -m policy --help iptables v1.2.11 Usage: iptables -[AD] chain rule-specification [options] iptables -[RI] chain rulenum rule-specification [options] iptables -D chain rulenum [options] --snip-- And: adam@shrike:~$ sudo