search for: policeing

Hi folks I have created a script file (dsmark+policing.sh attached) to check graphic an text outputs of simutations, against original examples/dsmark+policing coding (see TCNG Reference Manual-pg.90). It uses tcng coding (*.tcsim file attached) and old tc coding (*.tcsim_old file attached) inserted in tcsim files. Observation 1: The graphic outputs from (*.tc included in *.tcsim) and (*.tc_old

Hi, I notice that if two or more existing connections match an ingress policing filter, the input bandwidth does not get evenly divided up between the n connections. Kinda like litters of baby animals, where the stronger babies get more access to the mothers teats and grow up bigger and faster than their siblings. The only workaround that''s working for me is to set explicit ingress

I would like to test police in ingress. I use kernel 2.4.20. I use this configuration: iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 10.31.12.2 -d 10.31.11.2 -p udp --dport 1001 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 10.31.12.2 -d 10.31.11.2 -p udp --dport 1002 -j MARK --set-mark 2 iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -i eth0 -s 10.31.12.2 -d 10.31.11.2 -p udp --dport 1003 -j

On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Qiu Yu <unicell@gmail.com> wrote: > After some digging in openvswitch code. My wild guess is that vlan tag > reconfiguring triggered iface_configure_qos (vswitchd/bridge.c), which > in turn called netdev_set_policing to reset ingress policing rate. > Although there's no ingress_policing_rate set in my case, existing > ingress qdisc still

Hello everybody on the list, I have the following situation where I want to police the speed of incoming packets from specific subnets to 1024kbps and then police all the rest to 256kbps, which is the speed my ISP grants for the rest of the internet. So, eth1 is the one connected to the cable modem and then to the internet. I do: tc qdisc add dev eth1 ingress handle ffff: then: tc filter

Hi. I''m using the following filter from lartc "ultimate PPP" example: tc filter add dev $DEV parent ffff: protocol ip prio 50 u32 match ip src \ 0.0.0.0/0 police rate ${DOWNLINK}kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 It works fine, but when I remove the "burst 10k", I receive the following error: "burst" requires "rate". Illegal "police"

Hi stef and all I want measure the policy perfomance for video traffic on mpls diffserv network. there are two different polices for video packet 1. Video packets that are marked that are over the limit are to be rejected at the edge router. 2. Video packets that are marked that are over the limit are to be downgraded as best effort and are sent through. Before video enter my mpls

Hi, I''m trying to police ingress traffic based on port numbers and IP addresses. The u32 match based on IP addresses seems to work without issues and I''m am able to police incoming packets. However, the same isn''t working with u32 matches based on TCP port numbers. For port numbers, I added exactly one ''u32 match'' rule: common for both: # tc qdisc add

Hi, I''m trying to police the incoming traffic by using ingress qdisc,this is what I have in my script tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 4 \ handle 1: u32 divisor 1 tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 4 u32 \ match ip dport 4001 0xffff \ police rate 2000kbit burst 50k drop \ flowid

Hello, i try to use iptables to mark packet and then to filter them with tc. Here is my script: iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s 172.28.54.41/32 -p tcp -j MARK --set-mark 1 tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 10000kbit burst 10000kbit mtu 1500k drop flowid :1 I can not use u32 because i have several

I''m having trouble getting ingress policing to work on a bridged device. The bridge contains several interfaces: peth0, vif0.0, vif[1-7]0.1, vif[25].1 . (This is under xen, in case the vif''s didn''t give that away, so peth0 is renamed eth0.) The tc rules I have are: tc qdisc del dev peth0 root tc qdisc del dev peth0 ingress handle ffff: tc qdisc add dev peth0 root

Hi all, I''d like to have multiple polices in an interface with different src address, like that: tc qdisc add dev eth4 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth4 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src \ 192.168.18.0/24 police rate 128kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 tc filter add dev eth4 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 5 u32 match ip src \ 192.168.36.0/24 police rate

I am currently using the ultimate-tc script from http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.cookbook.ultimate-tc.html and I want to make sure that internet radio packets (mp3 streaming audio) will always get through no matter what. I have added some iptables commands like this: iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --dport 8000 -j TOS --set-tos Minimize-Delay iptables -A OUTPUT -t mangle -p tcp --sport 8000 -j

Currently, linux tc has very useful concept of a ''index'' for a given policy. However, I need to have policers on multiple hosts to share the same index (and thus, know and police the aggregate traffic across a set of routers). I''d like to be able to share tc policers across a set of boxes. Unfortunately, I''m not knowledgeable enough myself to implement that,

Hi, I am trying to do some simple ingress limiting based on fwmark. I know the ability and sense to do INGRESS limiting is ehm... limited ;-) but still I want to try it. I tried several things. === 1 === tcq ingress handle ffff: tcf parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 12mbit burst 10k drop tcf parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 2 fw police rate 10mbit burst 10k drop

Hi all I''m new to this list, but not exactly to iproute stuff. I''d like to solve a specific problem with bandwidth coming from different external sources towards the internal network (also the other way around, but I figure that''s not so much a problem, since that is egress traffic shaping). The network looks like this: internet ------ ISP-------[shaping/router]

Hi everyone, I''m new to tc but I need to use it to set up shaping on a new NAT box. In short: Each user must have their upload limited to 128kbit and downlink limited to 256kbit. Global bandwidth to be limited to 100Mbit Interactive packets to have higher priority 200+ users, so need to match packets fast So far I have managed to get the download limits working. However I need to

in order to minimize the police of the title of my graph i tried to use: >title("nombre de fleurs donn?es journellement par 6 cereus peruvianus du 1/07/02 au 31/09/02",font=0) but this message appears: Erreur dans title("nombre de fleurs donn?es journellement par 6 cereus peruvianus de 1/07/02 au 31/09/02", : valeur sp?cifi?e pour le param?tre graphique

>From CNET news: Belgium cracks down on file swapping By The Associated Press Special to CNET News.com February 15, 2001, 3:20 p.m. PT BRUSSELS, Belgium--Acting on complaints from the music industry, police have raided the homes of people who use music-sharing Web sites, looking for evidence they infringed copyright rules, the prosecutors' office said Thursday. Police searched the home

I just noticed that policers don''t seem to work with marks in 2.6 . Can anyone get - iptables -A PREROUTING -t mangle -p tcp -j MARK --set-mark 1 tc qdisc add dev eth0 handle ffff: ingress tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 1 handle 1 fw police rate 100kbit burst 10k drop flowid :1 To work on a 2.6 - it''s OK on 2.4.26, version of tc used makes no