search for: polarised

Dear R list, I'm having difficulties in choosing between a list or a data.frame, or an array for the storage and manipulation of my data (example follows). I've been using the three for different purposes but I would rather like to know which is more adapted to what task. Here is the data I'm currently working on: 200 observations, each observation being a vector of length

Hi R People: I'm teaching a statistical computing class using R starting next week (yay!) and I have an opinion type question, please. I'm old school and use "<-" in an assignment. However, I'm starting to see the "=" in the literature. Which should I use or does it matter, please? Thanks for your input! Sincerely, Erin -- Erin Hodgess Associate Professor

Hi, I've cross-posted this to freedesktop@, as the xdg@ list is only used for actual specification development. On Mon, 22 Oct 2018 at 00:36, Jacob Lifshay <programmerjake at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, we were thinking of asking if freedesktop would host Kazan (https://github.com/kazan-3d/kazan) for us, however some of our community members have objections with how freedesktop's

...oundation itself, the code of conduct, the complete annihilation of the ELF back-end in LLD last year, etc. For a community that wants to be inclusive by means of a CoC, we surely do a lot behind closed doors without any discussion in the open. As others have noticed, the CoC discussion has become polarised, with two groups sharing their ideas without conceding space. This, to me, is a beacon that shows me that we still value openness and consensus. And that is why I still spend my time arguing. Maybe I'm so wrong, I should be embarrassed. Maybe the foundation now controls everything and the code...

----- Original Message ----- > From: "Renato Golin via llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > To: "Chandler Carruth" <chandlerc at gmail.com> > Cc: "llvm-dev" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Sent: Thursday, May 5, 2016 2:06:30 PM > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] Resuming the discussion of establishing an LLVM code of conduct > > On 5

I know enough about R to be dangerous and our marketing people have asked me to "automate" some reporting. Data comes from an SQL source and graphs and various summaries are currently created manually in Excel. The raw information is invoicing records and the reporting is basically summaries by customer, region, product line etc. With function such as aggregate(), hist() and pareto()

Hello everybody. I'm a (quite) happy WINE user, but i would like to propose some things to the WINE developers. Something important imo, is that it must be easy to use for the user, and some things could be better, here are some ideas to improve it by using Winecfg: 1. Add an option to disable/enable/edit debug channels for all programs. As you may know, a lot of programs runs faster

Greetings all, This has come up a few times, and I would like to resume the effort to establish an LLVM code of conduct. First and foremost, many thanks to Philip Reames who sat down with me several months ago and worked through a number of suggestions that I've tried to incorporate into an updated patch with the draft text: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13741 I think his updates plus a few