search for: pocker

...v@xiph.org"<owner-speex-dev@xiph.org>, "Rodrigo Parra M"<rparra@ing.puc.cl> CC: "speex-dev@xiph.org"<speex-dev@xiph.org> Asunto: Re[2]: [speex-dev] 1.0.3 in ACM soon Hello Rodrigo, What do you mean? I have recently compiled 1.1.2 for Pocker PC. It has compiled without any issue and worked without problem... So I guess you may consider it is already ready for Pocket PC... Regards, Andrey. ------------------------------------------------------- Andrey Isaev Chief Project Manager Paragon Software (Sm...

...r-speex-dev@xiph.org>, "Rodrigo Parra M"<rparra@ing.puc.cl> R> CC: "speex-dev@xiph.org"<speex-dev@xiph.org> R> Asunto: Re[2]: [speex-dev] 1.0.3 in ACM soon R> Hello Rodrigo, R> What do you mean? I have recently compiled 1.1.2 for Pocker PC. It R> has compiled without any issue and worked without problem... R> So I guess you may consider it is already ready for Pocket PC... R> Regards, Andrey. R> ------------------------------------------------------- R> Andrey Isaev R> Chief Proj...

...at's not true. It is VERY similar. At least none of functions that > Speex core calls differs. Actually it does not call any Win32 > function, it calls stdlib, which is similar on all platform. > > So, I still don't understand what porting you need. If you are > familiar with Pocker PC programming you will make it work within > minutes. > > R> Some IDEs that help us to create code for pocket pc, for example, > R> are Visual C++ 3.0 embedded or Visual Studio.Net. > So, the problem is that you don't have this IDE? :))) Than you should > get it. It is...

...ent to Pocket Pc API. That's not true. It is VERY similar. At least none of functions that Speex core calls differs. Actually it does not call any Win32 function, it calls stdlib, which is similar on all platform. So, I still don't understand what porting you need. If you are familiar with Pocker PC programming you will make it work within minutes. R> Some IDEs that help us to create code for pocket pc, for example, R> are Visual C++ 3.0 embedded or Visual Studio.Net. So, the problem is that you don't have this IDE? :))) Than you should get it. It is for free. You could download...

...at's not true. It is VERY similar. At least none of functions that > Speex core calls differs. Actually it does not call any Win32 > function, it calls stdlib, which is similar on all platform. > > So, I still don't understand what porting you need. If you are > familiar with Pocker PC programming you will make it work within > minutes. > > R> Some IDEs that help us to create code for pocket pc, for example, > R> are Visual C++ 3.0 embedded or Visual Studio.Net. > So, the problem is that you don't have this IDE? :))) Than you should > get it. It is...

...r-speex-dev@xiph.org>, "Rodrigo Parra M"<rparra@ing.puc.cl> R> CC: "speex-dev@xiph.org"<speex-dev@xiph.org> R> Asunto: Re[2]: [speex-dev] 1.0.3 in ACM soon R> Hello Rodrigo, R> What do you mean? I have recently compiled 1.1.2 for Pocker PC. It R> has compiled without any issue and worked without problem... R> So I guess you may consider it is already ready for Pocket PC... R> Regards, Andrey. R> ------------------------------------------------------- R> Andrey Isaev R> Chief Proj...

I have started to update the ACM codec to Speex 1.0.3. Before a release I will also address some issues/bugs that have been brought to my attention. Following that I will try to port that code to PocketPC, making use of the unstable 1.1.3 version as integer build. There is probably little or no need for continuing work on my own integer version (called "Sphinx") Christian <p>---