search for: pocalypse

...irements to Vista, dropping support for running LLVM on Windows XP. Microsoft dropped support for XP half a year ago in April 2014. Our current status is that we require VS 2012 to build LLVM, and VS 2012 only runs on Vista+, but it has the ability produce binaries that run on XP. During the C++11-pocalypse, users expressed interest in keeping this working. I'm proposing that we drop support for this. Vista introduced a lot of handy system APIs that could significantly simplify LLVM's Support library. For example, I'd really like to use the blessed one-time initialization routines in this...

...irements to Vista, dropping support for running LLVM on Windows XP. Microsoft dropped support for XP half a year ago in April 2014. Our current status is that we require VS 2012 to build LLVM, and VS 2012 only runs on Vista+, but it has the ability produce binaries that run on XP. During the C++11-pocalypse, users expressed interest in keeping this working. I'm proposing that we drop support for this. Vista introduced a lot of handy system APIs that could significantly simplify LLVM's Support library. For example, I'd really like to use the blessed one-time initialization routines in this...

...s XP. Microsoft dropped support >> for XP half a year ago in April 2014. >> >> >> >> Our current status is that we require VS 2012 to build LLVM, and VS 2012 >> only runs on Vista+, but it has the ability produce binaries that run on >> XP. During the C++11-pocalypse, users expressed interest in keeping this >> working. I'm proposing that we drop support for this. >> >> >> >> Vista introduced a lot of handy system APIs that could significantly >> simplify LLVM's Support library. For example, I'd really like to use...

...2014. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Our current status is that we require VS 2012 to build LLVM, and VS 2012 >>>>> only runs on Vista+, but it has the ability produce binaries that run on XP. >>>>> During the C++11-pocalypse, users expressed interest in keeping this >>>>> working. I'm proposing that we drop support for this. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Vista introduced a lot of handy system APIs that could significantly >>>>> simp...

...in April 2014. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Our current status is that we require VS 2012 to build LLVM, and VS > 2012 > >>> only runs on Vista+, but it has the ability produce binaries that run > on XP. > >>> During the C++11-pocalypse, users expressed interest in keeping this > >>> working. I'm proposing that we drop support for this. > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Vista introduced a lot of handy system APIs that could significantly > >>> simplify LLVM's Su...

...> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Our current status is that we require VS 2012 to build LLVM, and VS >> 2012 >> >>> only runs on Vista+, but it has the ability produce binaries that run >> on XP. >> >>> During the C++11-pocalypse, users expressed interest in keeping this >> >>> working. I'm proposing that we drop support for this. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Vista introduced a lot of handy system APIs that could significantly >> >>&gt...

...t; >>> >>> Our current status is that we require VS 2012 to build LLVM, and VS >>> >>> 2012 >>> >>> only runs on Vista+, but it has the ability produce binaries that run >>> >>> on XP. >>> >>> During the C++11-pocalypse, users expressed interest in keeping this >>> >>> working. I'm proposing that we drop support for this. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Vista introduced a lot of handy system APIs that could significantly...

...gt; Our current status is that we require VS 2012 to build LLVM, and VS > >>> >>> 2012 > >>> >>> only runs on Vista+, but it has the ability produce binaries that > run > >>> >>> on XP. > >>> >>> During the C++11-pocalypse, users expressed interest in keeping > this > >>> >>> working. I'm proposing that we drop support for this. > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> > >>> >>> Vista introduced a lot of handy system...

...t we require VS 2012 to build LLVM, and >> VS >> >>> >>> 2012 >> >>> >>> only runs on Vista+, but it has the ability produce binaries that >> run >> >>> >>> on XP. >> >>> >>> During the C++11-pocalypse, users expressed interest in keeping >> this >> >>> >>> working. I'm proposing that we drop support for this. >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> >>> Vista introduce...

...build LLVM, and >>> VS >>> >>> >>> 2012 >>> >>> >>> only runs on Vista+, but it has the ability produce binaries >>> that run >>> >>> >>> on XP. >>> >>> >>> During the C++11-pocalypse, users expressed interest in keeping >>> this >>> >>> >>> working. I'm proposing that we drop support for this. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >...