search for: pnetmark

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "pnetmark".

2009 Mar 03
3
[LLVMdev] Issue with paper http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf and presentation http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf
...It has been using an unroller. "The PNet performance show that libjit has very few optimizations and does not compete against robust compilers." In fact any amateur in Just-In-Time compilers, and Virtual Machine engines, by just looking at this benchmark on the next page "Figure 7: PNetMark results (higher is better)", can tell that PNet engine used to take these measures has not been a Just-In-Time compiler. However, the authors of the paper insist. This benchmark definitely does not tell anything about LibJIT, as LibJIT has not been used. In fact, we started development of Lib...
2009 Mar 03
0
[LLVMdev] Issue with paper http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf and presentation http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf
...t; > "The PNet performance show that libjit has very few optimizations and > does not compete against robust compilers." > > In fact any amateur in Just-In-Time compilers, and Virtual Machine > engines, by just looking at this benchmark on the next page "Figure 7: > PNetMark results (higher is better)", can tell that PNet engine used > to take these measures has not been a Just-In-Time compiler. However, > the authors of the paper insist. > > This benchmark definitely does not tell anything about LibJIT, as > LibJIT has not been used. In fact, we st...
2009 Mar 02
0
[LLVMdev] Issue with paper http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf and presentation http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf
On Mar 2, 2009, at 8:25 AM, Kirill Kononenko wrote: > Hello Dear LLVM Developers and Users Hi Kirill, Please talk to Nicholas about this, thanks! -Chris > > > I would like to complain about scientific inaccuracy of the paper > http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf written by > Nicolas Geoffray, Gaël Thomas, Charles Clément, Bertil Folliot, Gilles > Muller
2009 Mar 02
2
[LLVMdev] Issue with paper http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf and presentation http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf
Hello Dear LLVM Developers and Users I would like to complain about scientific inaccuracy of the paper http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf written by Nicolas Geoffray, Gaël Thomas, Charles Clément, Bertil Folliot, Gilles Muller and presentation done by Nicolas Geoffray on LLVM conference supported by Google: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf They provide
2009 Apr 20
2
[LLVMdev] Issue with paper http://llvm.org/devmtg/2008-08/Geoffray_VMKitProject.pdf and presentation http://hal.inria.fr/docs/00/35/45/77/PDF/RR-6799.pdf
...et performance show that libjit has very few optimizations and >> does not compete against robust compilers." >> >> In fact any amateur in Just-In-Time compilers, and Virtual Machine >> engines, by just looking at this benchmark on the next page "Figure 7: >> PNetMark results (higher is better)", can tell that PNet engine used >> to take these measures has not been a Just-In-Time compiler. However, >> the authors of the paper insist. >> >> This benchmark definitely does not tell anything about LibJIT, as >> LibJIT has not been...