search for: pmu_in

Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "pmu_in".

Did you mean: mmu_in
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
2018 Dec 19
1
[PATCH] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
...veau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c @@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ nvkm_memx_fini(struct nvkm_memx **pmemx, bool exec) if (exec) { nvkm_pmu_send(pmu, reply, PROC_MEMX, MEMX_MSG_EXEC, memx->base, finish); + nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n", + reply[0], reply[1]); } - nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n", - reply[0], reply[1]); kfree(memx); return 0; } -- 2.19.1
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 203/671] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 203/671] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
...veau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c @@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ nvkm_memx_fini(struct nvkm_memx **pmemx, bool exec) if (exec) { nvkm_pmu_send(pmu, reply, PROC_MEMX, MEMX_MSG_EXEC, memx->base, finish); + nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n", + reply[0], reply[1]); } - nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n", - reply[0], reply[1]); kfree(memx); return 0; } -- 2.20.1
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 112/371] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.14 112/371] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
...veau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c @@ -88,10 +88,10 @@ nvkm_memx_fini(struct nvkm_memx **pmemx, bool exec) if (exec) { nvkm_pmu_send(pmu, reply, PROC_MEMX, MEMX_MSG_EXEC, memx->base, finish); + nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n", + reply[0], reply[1]); } - nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n", - reply[0], reply[1]); kfree(memx); return 0; } -- 2.20.1
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 081/251] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 081/251] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
...veau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c @@ -87,10 +87,10 @@ nvkm_memx_fini(struct nvkm_memx **pmemx, bool exec) if (exec) { nvkm_pmu_send(pmu, reply, PROC_MEMX, MEMX_MSG_EXEC, memx->base, finish); + nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n", + reply[0], reply[1]); } - nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n", - reply[0], reply[1]); kfree(memx); return 0; } -- 2.20.1
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 049/174] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
2020 Jan 16
0
[PATCH AUTOSEL 4.4 049/174] drm/nouveau/pmu: don't print reply values if exec is false
...veau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/subdev/pmu/memx.c @@ -87,10 +87,10 @@ nvkm_memx_fini(struct nvkm_memx **pmemx, bool exec) if (exec) { nvkm_pmu_send(pmu, reply, PROC_MEMX, MEMX_MSG_EXEC, memx->base, finish); + nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n", + reply[0], reply[1]); } - nvkm_debug(subdev, "Exec took %uns, PMU_IN %08x\n", - reply[0], reply[1]); kfree(memx); return 0; } -- 2.20.1