search for: pmpst

...riginal Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 2:50 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question llvm-gcc-4.0 is no longer maintained. Use llvm-gcc-4.2. On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi, > > I am using the llvm-gcc 4.0 front end binaries from llvm.org on an > intel > mac running 10.5.8. A couple of questions: > > 1) these binaries have "darwin8" as part of the file name. Are these > compatible with OS X 10.5.8 aka darwi...

On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Feb 1, 2009, at 11:06 PMPST, Chris Lattner wrote: > >> Now that 2.5 is about to branch, I'd like to bring up one of Scott's >> favorite topics: certain optimizers widen or narrow arithmetic, >> without regard for whether the type is legal for the target. In his >> specific case, instcombine...

On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:29 PMPST, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Feb 2, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> >> On Feb 1, 2009, at 11:06 PMPST, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >>> Now that 2.5 is about to branch, I'd like to bring up one of Scott's >>> favorite topics: certain op...

On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:55 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Thanks for getting back. I may not be able to switch to llvm 4.2 at > this > time. I did try: > > llvm-gcc --emit-llvm -c sumarray.c -o sumarray.bc > llc -march=ppc32 sumarray.bc > gcc -arch ppc sumarray.s > > And this produced...

Thanks again, Dale. Hopefully, someone has the answer. Jose -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:52 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:13 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Is there a way to get llvm 4.2 and os x 10.4 to work together? I am > trying to build on x86 10.5 for ppc 10.4 (using 10.4 sdk). I don't think the prebuilt binaries are useful for this environment. You'll need to build things yourself. I...

...hanks, Jose ________________________________ From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 3:10 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen; llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] status of EH tests in llvm test-suite On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: 2) The following test is commented out on purpose: MultiSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit Should this test still be commented out? It's actually has the most lines of code of all your tests and seems quite useful. In addition, it seems to work for us. Is ther...

On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:35 PMPST, Mike Stump wrote: > On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Kasra wrote: >> I was looking around the LLVM instruction set and I failed to find >> ROL and ROR instructions. Is there any plans on adding these >> instructions to LLVM? > > Not sure what you mean: He's referring to...

...m-gcc-4.2. Has anybody built for the environment Jose is targeting? -----Original Message----- From: Dale Johannesen [mailto:dalej at apple.com] Sent: Friday, January 29, 2010 3:52 PM To: Jose Rangel Cc: Dale Johannesen Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] llvm-gcc 4.0 question On Jan 29, 2010, at 3:13 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi Dale, > > Is there a way to get llvm 4.2 and os x 10.4 to work together? I am > trying to build on x86 10.5 for ppc 10.4 (using 10.4 sdk). I don't think the prebuilt binaries are useful for this environment. You'll need to build things yourself. I...

On Feb 25, 2009, at 6:01 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > On Feb 25, 2009, at 4:59 PMPST, Bill Wendling wrote: > >> I'm running into a problem where I need to have the "gcc" that's >> executed by "bugpoint" take certain arguments that aren't applicable >> to "llc". So, I came up with this patch, that adds a new flag >&gt...

On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > >> In many places there is code that looks like: >> >> MBBI = next(MBBI); >> >> In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these >> calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous: >> l...

On Nov 19, 2008, at 11:57 PMPST, Mon Ping Wang wrote: > Hi, > > When setting -mattr option on X86, I would like to treat MMX > separately from SSE levels. This would allow a client who sets the > attributes directly to set the SSE level independent of MMX, e.g., llc > -march=x86 -mattr=sse41, one would get sse4...

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 2:45 PM, Dale Johannesen <dalej at apple.com> wrote: > > On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:35 PMPST, Mike Stump wrote: > >> On Feb 3, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Kasra wrote: >>> I was looking around the LLVM instruction set and I failed to find >>> ROL and ROR instructions. Is there any plans on adding these >>> instructions to LLVM? >> >> Not sure what you...

On Feb 16, 2009, at 6:36 PMPST, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Feb 16, 2009, at 6:12 PM, aparna kotha wrote: > >> I am new to llvm and am stuck up with a problem. >> I am trying to initialize a Value* of type fp128 having the value 0 >> >> I am using the following construct >> >> Consta...

On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > In many places there is code that looks like: > > MBBI = next(MBBI); > > In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when these > calls are made. And due to ADL the above call becomes ambiguous: > llvm::next or std::next? > >...

On Nov 16, 2009, at 10:49 AMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: > On Nov 16, 2009, at 1:43 PM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > >> >> On Nov 14, 2009, at 3:16 PMPST, Howard Hinnant wrote: >> >>> In many places there is code that looks like: >>> >>> MBBI = next(MBBI); >>> >>> In C++0X there is a std::next that is likely to be in scope when >>> these >>> calls are made. And due to ADL the a...

The LegalizeDAG.cpp file has this code in SelectionDAGLegalize::PromoteNode: case ISD::BSWAP: { unsigned DiffBits = NVT.getSizeInBits() - OVT.getSizeInBits(); Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::ZERO_EXTEND, dl, NVT, Tmp1); Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::BSWAP, dl, NVT, Tmp1); Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::SRL, dl, NVT, Tmp1, DAG.getConstant(DiffBits, TLI.getShiftAmountTy()));

On Dec 22, 2009, at 2:38 PMPST, Bill Wendling wrote: > The LegalizeDAG.cpp file has this code in > SelectionDAGLegalize::PromoteNode: > > case ISD::BSWAP: { > unsigned DiffBits = NVT.getSizeInBits() - OVT.getSizeInBits(); > Tmp1 = DAG.getNode(ISD::ZERO_EXTEND, dl, NVT, Tmp1); > Tmp1 = DAG.getNod...

On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > 2) The following test is commented out on purpose: > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++-EH/spirit > > Should this test still be commented out? It’s actually has the most > lines of code of all your tests and seems quite useful. In addition, > it seems to wor...

Hi Dale, I will not change the default. I would dislike to see any regressions due to this type of change. -- Mon Ping On Nov 20, 2008, at 10:12 AM, Dale Johannesen wrote: > > On Nov 19, 2008, at 11:57 PMPST, Mon Ping Wang wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> When setting -mattr option on X86, I would like to treat MMX >> separately from SSE levels. This would allow a client who sets the >> attributes directly to set the SSE level independent of MMX, e.g., >> llc >> -mar...

llvm-gcc-4.0 is no longer maintained. Use llvm-gcc-4.2. On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:01 PMPST, Jose Rangel wrote: > Hi, > > I am using the llvm-gcc 4.0 front end binaries from llvm.org on an > intel > mac running 10.5.8. A couple of questions: > > 1) these binaries have "darwin8" as part of the file name. Are these > compatible with OS X 10.5.8 aka darwi...