Displaying 13 results from an estimated 13 matches for "pmovsxwd".
Did you mean:
pmovsxbd
2017 Aug 18
2
[PATCH] fix alignment exceptions
Hi,
Please find attached a patch to fix alignment exceptions. Without this
change, we were seeing occasional alignment faults when using this with
clang.
Thanks,
Felicia
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/opus/attachments/20170818/e0d6bb06/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text
2017 Aug 18
2
[PATCH] fix alignment exceptions
...it
> compiled with the version of the code with the explicit _mm_loadl_epi64
> intrinsic. Do you no longer see that?
>
> How does the code compile for you, and what is the issue you’re seeing?
> (One issue might be that clang’s address sanitizer isn’t smart enough to
> know that PMOVSXWD only loads 8 bytes, despite _mm_cvtepi16_epi32’s
> argument being an __mm128i; I’ve seen it trigger incorrect out-of-bounds
> read errors.)
>
> On Aug 18, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Felicia Lim <flim at google.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Please find attached a patch to fix alignme...
2017 Aug 18
1
[PATCH] fix alignment exceptions
...h the version of the code with the explicit _mm_loadl_epi64
>> intrinsic. Do you no longer see that?
>>
>> How does the code compile for you, and what is the issue you’re seeing?
>> (One issue might be that clang’s address sanitizer isn’t smart enough to
>> know that PMOVSXWD only loads 8 bytes, despite _mm_cvtepi16_epi32’s
>> argument being an __mm128i; I’ve seen it trigger incorrect out-of-bounds
>> read errors.)
>>
>> On Aug 18, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Felicia Lim <flim at google.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please find...
2017 Aug 18
0
[PATCH] fix alignment exceptions
...essary MOVQ instruction when it compiled with the version of the code with the explicit _mm_loadl_epi64 intrinsic. Do you no longer see that?
How does the code compile for you, and what is the issue you’re seeing? (One issue might be that clang’s address sanitizer isn’t smart enough to know that PMOVSXWD only loads 8 bytes, despite _mm_cvtepi16_epi32’s argument being an __mm128i; I’ve seen it trigger incorrect out-of-bounds read errors.)
On Aug 18, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Felicia Lim <flim at google.com<mailto:flim at google.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Please find attached a patch to fix alignment e...
2017 Aug 22
0
[PATCH] fix alignment exceptions
...essary MOVQ instruction when it compiled with the version of the code with the explicit _mm_loadl_epi64 intrinsic. Do you no longer see that?
How does the code compile for you, and what is the issue you’re seeing? (One issue might be that clang’s address sanitizer isn’t smart enough to know that PMOVSXWD only loads 8 bytes, despite _mm_cvtepi16_epi32’s argument being an __mm128i; I’ve seen it trigger incorrect out-of-bounds read errors.)
On Aug 18, 2017, at 12:34 PM, Felicia Lim <flim at google.com<mailto:flim at google.com>> wrote:
Hi,
Please find attached a patch to fix alignment e...
2015 Mar 13
1
[RFC PATCH v3] Intrinsics/RTCD related fixes. Mostly x86.
...+# if defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE)
+# define MAY_HAVE_SSE(name) name ## _sse
+# else
+# define MAY_HAVE_SSE(name) name ## _c
+# endif
+
# if defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE2)
# define MAY_HAVE_SSE2(name) name ## _sse2
# else
@@ -55,21 +61,25 @@ int opus_select_arch(void);
reference in the PMOVSXWD instruction itself, but gcc is not smart enough to
optimize this out when optimizations ARE enabled.
- It appears clang requires us to do this always (which is fair, since
- technically the compiler is always allowed to do the dereference before
- invoking the function implementing the intr...
2015 Mar 12
1
[RFC PATCHv2] Intrinsics/RTCD related fixes. Mostly x86.
...+# if defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE)
+# define MAY_HAVE_SSE(name) name ## _sse
+# else
+# define MAY_HAVE_SSE(name) name ## _c
+# endif
+
# if defined(OPUS_X86_MAY_HAVE_SSE2)
# define MAY_HAVE_SSE2(name) name ## _sse2
# else
@@ -55,21 +61,25 @@ int opus_select_arch(void);
reference in the PMOVSXWD instruction itself, but gcc is not smart enough to
optimize this out when optimizations ARE enabled.
- It appears clang requires us to do this always (which is fair, since
- technically the compiler is always allowed to do the dereference before
- invoking the function implementing the intr...
2015 Mar 02
13
Patch cleaning up Opus x86 intrinsics configury
The attached patch cleans up Opus's x86 intrinsics configury.
It:
* Makes ?enable-intrinsics work with clang and other non-GCC compilers
* Enables RTCD for the floating-point-mode SSE code in Celt.
* Disables use of RTCD in cases where the compiler targets an instruction set by default.
* Enables the SSE4.1 Silk optimizations that apply to the common parts of Silk when Opus is built in
2015 Mar 18
5
[RFC PATCH v1 0/4] Enable aarch64 intrinsics/Ne10
Hi All,
Since I continue to base my work on top of Jonathan's patch,
and my previous Ne10 fft/ifft/mdct_forward/backward patches,
I thought it would be better to just post all new patches
as a patch series. Please let me know if anyone disagrees
with this approach.
You can see wip branch of all latest patches at
https://git.linaro.org/people/viswanath.puttagunta/opus.git
Branch:
2015 Mar 31
6
[RFC PATCH v1 0/5] aarch64: celt_pitch_xcorr: Fixed point series
Hi Timothy,
As I mentioned earlier [1], I now fixed compile issues
with fixed point and resubmitting the patch.
I also have new patch that does intrinsics optimizations
for celt_pitch_xcorr targetting aarch64.
You can find my latest work-in-progress branch at [2]
For reference, you can use the Ne10 pre-built libraries
at [3]
Note that I am working with Phil at ARM to get my patch at [4]
2015 May 08
8
[RFC PATCH v2]: Ne10 fft fixed and previous 0/8]
Hi All,
As per Timothy's suggestion, disabling mdct_forward
for fixed point. Only effects
armv7,armv8: Extend fixed fft NE10 optimizations to mdct
Rest of patches are same as in [1]
For reference, latest wip code for opus is at [2]
Still working with NE10 team at ARM to get corner cases of
mdct_forward. Will update with another patch
when issue in NE10 gets fixed.
Regards,
Vish
[1]:
2015 May 15
11
[RFC V3 0/8] Ne10 fft fixed and previous
Hi All,
Changes from RFC v2 [1]
armv7,armv8: Extend fixed fft NE10 optimizations to mdct
- Overflow issue fixed by Phil at ARM. Ne10 wip at [2]. Should be upstream soon.
- So, re-enabled using fixed fft for mdct_forward which was disabled in RFCv2
armv7,armv8: Optimize fixed point fft using NE10 library
- Thanks to Jonathan Lennox, fixed some build fixes on iOS and some copy-paste errors
Rest
2015 Apr 28
10
[RFC PATCH v1 0/8] Ne10 fft fixed and previous
Hello Timothy / Jean-Marc / opus-dev,
This patch series is follow up on work I posted on [1].
In addition to what was posted on [1], this patch series mainly
integrates Fixed point FFT implementations in NE10 library into opus.
You can view my opus wip code at [2].
Note that while I found some issues both with the NE10 library(fixed fft)
and with Linaro toolchain (armv8 intrinsics), the work