search for: pmodels

Dear R users, I'm a little lost on how to define pmodels for the DRC package. My goals are to produce isoboles of binary toxicity data. any tips? I really just need to know what pmodels refers to. Cheers, Pat -- View this message in context: http://r.789695.n4.nabble.com/pmodels-in-DRC-tp4190567p4190567.html Sent from the R help mailing list archiv...

Hello Giovanni I made a minor modification to your function, which now allows to compute the within R-sq in Twoways Within models (see below). However I ran into an issue that I have already encountered before: whenever I try to fit Twoways Within models on my unbalanced data, the process is strangely slow and I usually terminate it either after ~15min or when my CPU hits 100C. This is similar to

Dear R users, I wish to manually demean a panel over time and entities. I tried to code the Wansbeek and Kapteyn (1989) transformation (from Baltagi's book Ch. 9). As a benchmark I use both the pmodel.response() and model.matrix() functions in package plm and the results from using dummy variables. As far as I understood the transformation (Ch.3), Q%*%y (with y being the dependent variable)

Quiero comparar varias dosis letales 50% (LD50) usando análisis probit. He seguido un ejemplo que viene en paquete DRC, pero no obtengo el resultado esperado. Lo que quiero es saber si las LD50s, son diferentes y si la diferencias son estadísticamente significativas. Gracias de antemano. José Arturo e-mail. jafarfan@uady.mx <grejon@uady.mx> e-mail alterno. jafarfan@gmail.com

Hello, I am trying to run a fixed effects panel regression on data containing 5 columns and 1,494 rows. I read the data in as follows: >drugsXX<-read.csv(file="C:\\Folder\\vX.X\\Drugs\\drugsXX_panel.csv", head=TRUE, sep=",") Verified it read in correctly and had a good data.frame: >dim(drugsXX) [1] 1494 5 >drugs XX produce expected data with correct column

Hi there, Maybe people who know both R and econometrics will be able to answer my questions. I want to run panel regressions in R with fixed-effect. I know two ways to do it. First, I can include factor(grouping_variable) in my regression equation. Second, I plan to subtract group mean from my variables and run OLS panel regression with function lm(). I plan to do it with the second way because

In the rockchalk package, I want to provide functions for regression objects that are "well behaved." If an object responds to the methods that lm or glm objects can handle, like coef(), nobs(), and summary(), I want to be able to handle the same thing. It is more difficult than expected to ask a given fitted model object "do you respond to these functions: coef(), nobs(),

Hi, How would one go about determining if the slope terms from an analysis of covariance model are different from eachother? Based on the example from MASS: library(MASS) # parallel slope model l.para <- lm(Temp ~ Gas + Insul, data=whiteside) # multiple slope model l.mult <- lm(Temp ~ Insul/Gas -1, data=whiteside) # compare nested models: anova(l.para, l.mult) Analysis of Variance

Hi, I am trying to run a panel regression using 88 observations and 9 variables. In-built Hausman Test did not work, then I found a code for auxiliary regression method for the Hausman test. The panel models are: fe=plm(gd ~ l+g+o+c+g1+h+n+r, model = "within", data = new.frame,index = c("id")) re=plm(gd ~ l+g+o+c+g1+h+n+r, model = "random", data = new.frame,index =

Hello, I am trying to conduct a Hausman test to choose between FE estimators and RE estimators. When I try to run: library(plm) fixed <- plm(ROS ~ DiffClosenessC +ZZiele + AggSK + nRedundantStrecken + Degree + KantenGew + BetweennessC + SitzKappazitaet, data=Panel,index=c("id","time"),model="within") summary(fixed) fixef(fixed) random <-plm(ROS ~

> On Mar 31, 2016, at 1:00 PM, Paul Johnson <pauljohn32 at gmail.com> wrote: > > In the rockchalk package, I want to provide functions for regression > objects that are "well behaved." If an object responds to the methods > that lm or glm objects can handle, like coef(), nobs(), and summary(), > I want to be able to handle the same thing. > > It is more

Dear Philipp, this is just a tentative answer because debugging is really not possible without a reproducible example (or, at a very bare minimum, the output from traceback()). Anyway, thank you for reporting this interesting numerical issue; I'll try to replicate some similar behaviour on a similarly dimensioned artificial dataset when I have some time (which might not be soon). As for now,

Hello, I am using {plm} to estimate panel models. I want to estimate a model that includes fixed effects for time and individual, but has a random individual effect for the coefficient on the independent variable. That is, I would like to estimate the model: Y_it = a_i + a_t + B_i * X_it + e_it Where i denotes individuals, t denotes time, X is my independent variable, and B (beta) is the

Hello again Max. A correction to my response from yesterday. Things were better than they seemed. I thought it over, checked Arellano's panel book and Driscoll and Kraay (Rev. Econ. Stud. 1998) and finally realized that vcovSCC does what you want: in fact, despite being born primarily for dealing with cross-sectional correlation, 'SCC' standard errors are robust to "both

Dear R users, I have an unbalanced panel with an average of I=100 individuals and a total of T=1370 time intervals, i.e. T>>I. So far, I have been using the plm package. I wish to estimate a FE model like: res<-plm(x~c+v, data=pdata_frame, effect="twoways", model="within", na.action=na.omit) ?where c varies over i and t, and v represents an exogenous impact on x

Is there a way to estimate a nominal response model? To be more specific let's say I want to calibrate: \pi_{v}(\theta_j)=\frac{e^{\xi_{v}+\lambda_{v}\theta_j}}{\sum_{h=1}^m e^{\xi_{h}+\lambda_{h}\theta_j}} Where $\theta_j$ is a the dependent variable and I need to estimate $\xi_{h}$ and $\lambda_{h}$ for $h \in {1...,m}$. Thank you, Mauricio Romero Quantil S.A.S. Cel: 3112231150