search for: pmd_error

....orig/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h +++ clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h @@ -55,50 +55,62 @@ extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAG */ #define PTRS_PER_PTE 512 -#define pte_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pte %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pte_val(e)) -#define pmd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pmd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pmd_val(e)) -#define pud_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pud %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pud_val(e)) -#define pgd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pgd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__,...

....orig/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h +++ clean-start/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h @@ -55,50 +55,62 @@ extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAG */ #define PTRS_PER_PTE 512 -#define pte_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pte %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pte_val(e)) -#define pmd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pmd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pmd_val(e)) -#define pud_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pud %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pud_val(e)) -#define pgd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pgd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__,...

Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet

Hey folks, This is the part-of-pvops-implementation-that-is-not-exactly-a-merge. Neat, uh? This is the majority of the work. The first patch in the series does not really belong here. It was already sent to lkml separetedly before, but I'm including it again, for a very simple reason: Try to test the paravirt patches without it, and you'll fail miserably ;-) (and it was not yet

Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch. If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more! There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here are the causes: * split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi: - Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is not worthwhile. So, although we do

Here is an slightly updated version of the paravirt_ops patch. If your comments and criticism were welcome before, now it's even more! There are some issues that are _not_ addressed in this revision, and here are the causes: * split debugreg into multiple functions, suggested by Andi: - Me and jsfg agree that introducing more pvops (specially 14!) is not worthwhile. So, although we do

Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing

Hey folks, Here's a new spin of the pvops64 patch series. We didn't get that many comments from the last time, so it should be probably almost ready to get in. Heya! >From the last version, the most notable changes are: * consolidation of system.h, merging jeremy's comments about ordering concerns * consolidation of smp functions that goes through smp_ops. They're sharing

This is hopefully the last iteration of the pvops64 patch. >From the last version, we have only one change, which is include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: There were still one survivor in raw asm. Also, git screwed me up for some reason, and the 25th patch was missing the new files, paravirt.{c,h}. (although I do remember having git-add'ed it, but who knows...) Andrew, could you please push it

This is hopefully the last iteration of the pvops64 patch. >From the last version, we have only one change, which is include/asm-x86_64/processor.h: There were still one survivor in raw asm. Also, git screwed me up for some reason, and the 25th patch was missing the new files, paravirt.{c,h}. (although I do remember having git-add'ed it, but who knows...) Andrew, could you please push it

...nclude/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h +++ linux-2.6.19-quilt/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h @@ -55,50 +55,60 @@ extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAG */ #define PTRS_PER_PTE 512 -#define pte_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pte %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pte_val(e)) -#define pmd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pmd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pmd_val(e)) -#define pud_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pud %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pud_val(e)) -#define pgd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pgd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__,...

...nclude/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h +++ linux-2.6.19-quilt/include/asm-x86_64/pgtable.h @@ -55,50 +55,60 @@ extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAG */ #define PTRS_PER_PTE 512 -#define pte_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pte %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pte_val(e)) -#define pmd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pmd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pmd_val(e)) -#define pud_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pud %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__, __LINE__, &(e), pud_val(e)) -#define pgd_ERROR(e) \ - printk("%s:%d: bad pgd %p(%016lx).\n", __FILE__,...

I''m sure everyone has seen the drop of VMI patches for Linux at this point, but just in case, the link is included below. I''ve read this version of the VMI spec and have made my way through most of the patches. While I wasn''t really that impressed with the first spec wrt Xen, the second version seems to be much more palatable. Specifically, the code inlining and