search for: pmd_cach

...d long flags; /* can be called from interrupt context */ + ClearPagePDE(virt_to_page(pgd)); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -244,13 +246,16 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + SetPagePDE(virt_to_page(pmd)); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + ClearPagePDE(pfn_to_page(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT)); kmem_cache_fre...

...d long flags; /* can be called from interrupt context */ + ClearPagePDE(virt_to_page(pgd)); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -244,13 +246,16 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + SetPagePDE(virt_to_page(pmd)); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + ClearPagePDE(pfn_to_page(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT)); kmem_cache_fre...

...goto out_oom; SetPagePDE(virt_to_page(pmd)); - set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); + set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(_PAGE_PRESENT | __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { ClearPagePDE(pfn_to_page(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT)); - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1)); + kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i]) & PAGE_MASK)); } kmem_cache_free(pgd_cache, pgd); return NULL; @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ void pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd) if (PTRS_PER_PMD > 1) for (i = 0; i < USER_PTRS_PER_PGD; ++i) { ClearP...

...goto out_oom; SetPagePDE(virt_to_page(pmd)); - set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); + set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(_PAGE_PRESENT | __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { ClearPagePDE(pfn_to_page(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT)); - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1)); + kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i]) & PAGE_MASK)); } kmem_cache_free(pgd_cache, pgd); return NULL; @@ -268,7 +268,7 @@ void pgd_free(pgd_t *pgd) if (PTRS_PER_PMD > 1) for (i = 0; i < USER_PTRS_PER_PGD; ++i) { ClearP...

...n be called from interrupt context */ + paravirt_release_pd(__pa(pgd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -274,13 +281,18 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1)); + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { +...

...n be called from interrupt context */ + paravirt_release_pd(__pa(pgd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -274,13 +281,18 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1)); + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { +...

...n be called from interrupt context */ + paravirt_release_pd(__pa(pgd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -274,13 +281,18 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1)); + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { +...

...n be called from interrupt context */ + paravirt_release_pd(__pa(pgd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); spin_lock_irqsave(&pgd_lock, flags); pgd_list_del(pgd); spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pgd_lock, flags); @@ -274,13 +281,18 @@ pgd_t *pgd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm) pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + paravirt_alloc_pd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) - kmem_cache_free(pmd_cache, (void *)__va(pgd_val(pgd[i])-1)); + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { +...

Is there any real use in having a ctor/dtor for the pgd cache? Given that all pgd allocation happens via pgd_alloc/pgd_free, why not just fold the [cd]tor in? I'm asking because Xen wants pgd[3] to be unshared in the PAE case, and it looks to me like the easiest way to handle that is by making pgd_alloc/free pv-ops and doing the appropriate thing in the Xen code. Would need to sort out the

Is there any real use in having a ctor/dtor for the pgd cache? Given that all pgd allocation happens via pgd_alloc/pgd_free, why not just fold the [cd]tor in? I'm asking because Xen wants pgd[3] to be unshared in the PAE case, and it looks to me like the easiest way to handle that is by making pgd_alloc/free pv-ops and doing the appropriate thing in the Xen code. Would need to sort out the

...*/ + mach_setup_pgd(__pa(pgd) >> PAGE_SHIFT, + __pa(swapper_pg_dir) >> PAGE_SHIFT, + USER_PTRS_PER_PGD, + PTRS_PER_PGD - USER_PTRS_PER_PGD); for (i = 0; i < USER_PTRS_PER_PGD; ++i) { pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + mach_setup_pmd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + mach_release_pmd(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT); kmem_ca...

...*/ + mach_setup_pgd(__pa(pgd) >> PAGE_SHIFT, + __pa(swapper_pg_dir) >> PAGE_SHIFT, + USER_PTRS_PER_PGD, + PTRS_PER_PGD - USER_PTRS_PER_PGD); for (i = 0; i < USER_PTRS_PER_PGD; ++i) { pmd_t *pmd = kmem_cache_alloc(pmd_cache, GFP_KERNEL); if (!pmd) goto out_oom; + mach_setup_pmd(__pa(pmd) >> PAGE_SHIFT); set_pgd(&pgd[i], __pgd(1 + __pa(pmd))); } return pgd; out_oom: - for (i--; i >= 0; i--) + for (i--; i >= 0; i--) { + mach_release_pmd(pgd_val(pgd[i]) >> PAGE_SHIFT); kmem_ca...

Hi Andi, This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces necessary for Xen. The brief overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack

Hi Andi, This series of patches updates paravirt_ops in various ways. Some of the changes are plain cleanups and improvements, and some add some interfaces necessary for Xen. The brief overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch - obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch - no longer needed paravirt-nop.patch - mark nop operations consistently paravirt-pte-accessors.patch - operations to pack/unpack

This is my current set of updates to Xen for 2.6.24. This is largely a bugfix set, and a couple of them are also relevent to 2.6.23. These are in the pre-x86 merge form; I'll update them once the merge goes into git. Quick overview: - remove some dead code in arch/i386/mm/init.c - clean up some duplicate includes - when sending an IPI, yield the vcpu if the destination doesn't have

This is my current set of updates to Xen for 2.6.24. This is largely a bugfix set, and a couple of them are also relevent to 2.6.23. These are in the pre-x86 merge form; I'll update them once the merge goes into git. Quick overview: - remove some dead code in arch/i386/mm/init.c - clean up some duplicate includes - when sending an IPI, yield the vcpu if the destination doesn't have

This is my current set of updates to Xen for 2.6.24. This is largely a bugfix set, and a couple of them are also relevent to 2.6.23. These are in the pre-x86 merge form; I'll update them once the merge goes into git. Quick overview: - remove some dead code in arch/i386/mm/init.c - clean up some duplicate includes - when sending an IPI, yield the vcpu if the destination doesn't have

Hi Andi, Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day. Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering, cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery. Overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch No longer meaningful or needed. paravirt-nop.patch Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to

Hi Andi, Here's a repost of the paravirt_ops update series I posted the other day. Since then, I found a few potential bugs with patching clobbering, cleaned up and documented paravirt.h and the patching machinery. Overview: add-MAINTAINERS.patch obvious remove-CONFIG_DEBUG_PARAVIRT.patch No longer meaningful or needed. paravirt-nop.patch Clean up nop paravirt_ops functions, mainly to

I''m sure everyone has seen the drop of VMI patches for Linux at this point, but just in case, the link is included below. I''ve read this version of the VMI spec and have made my way through most of the patches. While I wasn''t really that impressed with the first spec wrt Xen, the second version seems to be much more palatable. Specifically, the code inlining and