search for: plymouthhistori

*Another reply that was accidentally sent to the wrong address...* I ran another test of a share on the raid array after making the changes you suggested Rowland. I reset the ACLs on /mnt/md0/samba_shares/test as outlined in the wiki and set the default group to domain admins. I executed setfacl commands g=rwx and chgrp domain admins, then added the directory to my smb.conf and ran

Hi Rowland, *Apparently I accidentally replied directly to you instead of the list, this is from a couple days ago...* First off, thanks again for your help, your insight is invaluable. I have completed the changes you suggested: I've used ADUC to remove the NIS Domain and UID/GID number from the following Users/Groups: - group policy creator owners - enterprise admins - schema

Hello to the Samba devs and mailing list subscribers, I've run into a bit of trouble getting a new domain member server setup. I've got three Ubuntu 14.04 64 bit VMs running the latest stable build of Samba built from source acting as Domain Controllers. I've got a fourth physical machine running Ubuntu 16.04 64 bit running the canonical distribution samba (Version 4.3.9-Ubuntu)

So it seems that I have identified the source of all of my permissions issues, though I'm unclear as to exactly why these problems have occurred and would love an explanation if anyone can offer one. I was using mdadm to create a RAID 1 array, formatting it ext4 and storing all of the data that samba was serving on /dev/md0. The two drives that make up the array are hosted by an LSI MegaRaid

On Wed, 21 Sep 2016 11:09:15 -0400 Jason Secord <it at plymouthhistory.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > I've already removed all "admin users" and "valid users" entries from > my smb.conf, they ended up there after hours of confusion trying to > drill down to the root of the problem. > > To remove the aforementioned UID/GIDs, I can do that via the

Mediawiki is throwing an error at this moment but I followed that page when I set up the shares and triple checked everything when I last reset ACLs. JS On Sep 23, 2016 2:51 AM, "Rowland Penny via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:23:05 -0400 > Jason Secord via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > *Another reply that

On Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:23:05 -0400 Jason Secord via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > *Another reply that was accidentally sent to the wrong address...* > > I ran another test of a share on the raid array after making the > changes you suggested Rowland. I reset the ACLs > on /mnt/md0/samba_shares/test as outlined in the wiki and set the > default group to domain

Hi Rowland, >From the top down, I'm going to try and cover every step involved in the wiki and give you as much info as I can in the hope that we can get this issue resolved, or at least determine that there is nothing wrong with my config and that the underlying array has to be the weak point, even if none of us know why. *Step 1: Filesystem support* We need the filesystem to support

On Sun, 25 Sep 2016 00:49:25 -0400 Jason Secord via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi Rowland, > > From the top down, I'm going to try and cover every step involved in > the wiki and give you as much info as I can in the hope that we can > get this issue resolved, or at least determine that there is nothing > wrong with my config and that the underlying

Re: zfs... The odd thing is... It's not mdadm that's acting up, at least not in my opinion, as I have had two other domain member servers at other locations that host shares on filesystems that are raid arrays built with mdadm. The only difference between those boxes and this one is the LSI MegaRaid controller. Now I'm no expert when it comes to this controller, the box shipped with

Rowland: I set up all domain controllers bind installs the same, followed the wiki. Marc: that's the piece of information i needed... Now, I'll double check this, but the other night I created a new record using the DNS snap-in from RSAT on DC1. After a few minutes i checked DC2's DNS zones and the record was not visible. I checked that drs showrepl was reporting successful