search for: plumgrid

...contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:52 PM, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > LGTM. > Please commit. > > Thanks > > Galina > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Marco Leogrande <marcol at plumgrid.com> > wrote: >> >> Galina, >> thanks again for your help. >> >> I have cooked a new patch that should make a bit more sense. >> I have added the new builder under >> _get_experimental_scheduled_builders(), as the comment above that >> function...

...that function suggested me it would be a good idea. :) Does it look a reasonable start? Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 7:06 PM, Marco Leogrande <marcol at plumgrid.com> wrote: > Hi Galina, > > thanks for the info! > > I think we will go for the "LLVM+clang with cmake" approach, since the > BPF target has been marked non-experimental in the meantime, and we > are interested in building clang as well. > I will provide the in...

...ossible issues and instabilities before promoting it to a stable one. You do need a local master to be able to debug and test if you develop zorg, i.e. write a new CMakeBuildFactory and such, though. Hope this helps. Thanks Galina On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:04 PM, Marco Leogrande <marcol at plumgrid.com> wrote: > Hi all, > I was trying to make some progress on this front and I spent some more > time on it. > > * I think I managed to configure the buildslave correctly; any chance > there is a way to test that before the buildmaster is configured? > > * I was trying t...

On 31 October 2016 at 18:56, Marco Leogrande <marcol at plumgrid.com> wrote: > For clang-bpf-build the change should be trivial since we don't use a > fancy configuration. > I have attached the patch, please apply if appropriate. I believe it should just work. Galina, can you give it a try? The build should "just work". :) thanks! --...

Hi everyone, I am working with Alexei Starovoitov to contribute an LLVM buildbot for the experimental BPF backend. I am following the steps at [1] to setup a buildbot and I was mostly successful: I was able to setup a slave and a temporary master to check its base config. Now I'm not sure about the next step: patching the "slaves.py" and "builders.py" files in zorg. * Is

Hi Richard, Marco, I noticed that you two are the remaining bot owners using the `getClangBuildFactory` from `ClangBuilder`. All the other bots using that builder have moved to the new `getClangCMakeBuildFactory`, including Windows ones. Given that they do similar functionalities, I'd like to encourage you to move to the new factory, so that we can simplify the builder's code. Thanks!

Renato, thanks for the heads-up. For clang-bpf-build the change should be trivial since we don't use a fancy configuration. I have attached the patch, please apply if appropriate. Thanks. Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Renato Golin

I applied it and reconfigured the master. Thanks for the heads-up! Thanks Galina On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 31 October 2016 at 18:56, Marco Leogrande <marcol at plumgrid.com> wrote: > > For clang-bpf-build the change should be trivial since we don't use a > > fancy configuration. > > I have attached the patch, please apply if appropriate. > > I believe it should just work. Galina, can you give it a try? > > The build should &quo...

I have installed ninja and retriggered that build. I will monitor the results to confirm it succeeds. Regards, Marco Leogrande Sent by a carbon-based life form; hence, it may contain repetitions, inaccuracies, logical fallacies and repetitions. On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: > On 31 October 2016 at 19:46, Galina Kistanova

On 31 October 2016 at 19:46, Galina Kistanova <gkistanova at gmail.com> wrote: > I applied it and reconfigured the master. Thanks Galina! Marco, the build is complaining about Ninja: http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-bpf-build/builds/414/steps/cmake%20stage%201/logs/stdio CMake was unable to find a build program corresponding to "Ninja" Now I remember we used ninja by

...wrote: > > > On 2015/8/4 17:01, Wangnan (F) wrote: >> For people who in llvmdev: >> >> This mail is belong to a thread in linux kernel mailing list, the >> first message >> can be retrived from: >> >> http://lkml.kernel.org/r/55B1535E.8090406 at plumgrid.com >> >> Our goal is to fild a way to make BPF program get an unique ID for >> each type >> so it can pass the ID to other part of kernel, then we can retrive >> the type and >> decode the structure using DWARF information. Currently we have two >> prob...

On 8/4/15 11:51 PM, Wangnan (F) wrote: > void bpf_store_half(void *skb, int off, int val) > asm("llvm.bpf.store.half"); > int func() > { > bpf_store_half(0, 0, 0); > return 0; > } > > Compiled with: > > $ clang -g -target bpf -O2 -S -c test.c > > And get this: > > .text > .globl func > .align