search for: plugnin

...his is very unclear. How come there would not be the "latest" view on index. What is the real meaning of this function ? > > Q5 : Rescan : is it just a bout remonving all indexes for a specific mailbox ? > > Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see below) ? > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/attachments/20190107/0b94727a/attachment.html>

and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that backend dependent ? Would- nt the below function below be the same for any backend ? Waiting fro your feedback on all those questions Thank you JM ----------------- static int fts_backend_xapian_lookup_multi(struct fts_backend *_backend, struct mailbox *const boxes[], struct mail_search_arg *args, enum fts_lookup_flags flags,

...first missing mail, even the mails that are already in the index. fts-lucene implements this, but other FTS backends are lazy and simply rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even delete the extra mails. > Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see below) ? >> and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that backend dependent ? This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in all folders. In that case the boxes[] w...

...ail, even the mails that are already in the index. > > fts-lucene implements this, but other FTS backends are lazy and simply rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even delete the extra mails. > > Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see below) ? and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that backend dependent ? This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in all folders. In that case the boxes[] would cont...

...nd it ? Q4 : Refresh : this is very unclear. How come there would not be the "latest" view on index. What is the real meaning of this function ? Q5 : Rescan : is it just a bout remonving all indexes for a specific mailbox ? Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see below) ? THank you On 2019-01-06 16:50, Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote: > and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that backend dependent ? > > Would- nt the below function below be the same for any backend ? > > Waiting fro your feedback on all those que...

.../div> <div> rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even </div> <div> delete the extra mails. </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see </div> <div> below) ?and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that </div> <div> backend dependent ? </div> <div> This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for </div> <div&g...

...ail, even the mails that are already in the index. > > fts-lucene implements this, but other FTS backends are lazy and simply rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even delete the extra mails. > > Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see below) ? and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that backend dependent ? This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in all folders. In that case the boxes[] would cont...

...the first missing mail, even the mails that are already in the index. fts-lucene implements this, but other FTS backends are lazy and simply rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even delete the extra mails. Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see below) ?and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that backend dependent ? This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in all folders. In that case the boxes[] would contai...

...n the index. >> >> fts-lucene implements this, but other FTS backends are lazy and simply >> rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even >> delete the extra mails. >> >> Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see >> below) ?and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that >> backend dependent ? >> This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for >> example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in >>...

...mails that are already in the index. > > fts-lucene implements this, but other FTS backends are lazy and simply > rebuild all mails. Actually fts-solr is bad because it doesn't even > delete the extra mails. > > Q6 : lokkup_multi : isn't the function the same for all plugnins (see > below) ?and finally , for fts_backend_xxxx_lookup_multi, why is that > backend dependent ? > This function is called only when searching in virtual folders. So for > example the virtual "All mails" folder, which would contain all mails in > all folders. In that...