search for: plot2fig

On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jeff Cohen wrote: > I haven't specifically tried the 1.5 branch yet on FreeBSD, but the current > version just before you branched it passes gmake check and fails four > llvm-test tests: siod, SPASS, archie, and plot2fig. SPASS needs porting > work to compile correctly on FreeBSD. I haven't analyzed the other three > yet, but they weren't failing two days earlier. Chances are they weren't even showing up on the nightly tests before. I recently added a patch that shows test which don't b...

siod fails with gcc link errors: cannot find -ldl archie and plot2fig fail with gcc link errors: re_comp and re_exec are undefined Chris Lattner wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> I haven't specifically tried the 1.5 branch yet on FreeBSD, but the >> current version just before you branched it passes gmake check and >&g...

On Tue, 17 May 2005, Jeff Cohen wrote: > siod fails with gcc link errors: cannot find -ldl > archie and plot2fig fail with gcc link errors: re_comp and re_exec are > undefined Again, the reason that these are showing up is because I changed the makefiles. They were failing before, just not notifying us. If the native compiler fails, we have nothing to compare against. As such (again, if this is the...

I haven't specifically tried the 1.5 branch yet on FreeBSD, but the current version just before you branched it passes gmake check and fails four llvm-test tests: siod, SPASS, archie, and plot2fig. SPASS needs porting work to compile correctly on FreeBSD. I haven't analyzed the other three yet, but they weren't failing two days earlier. John Criswell wrote: > Dear All, > > I've finished building binaries for the GCC frontends and am now testing > the 1.5 releas...

Dear All, I've finished building binaries for the GCC frontends and am now testing the 1.5 release branch on i386/Linux, Sparc/Solaris, and PowerPC/MacOS X. I'm looking for volunteers to test LLVM 1.5 on platforms that we don't have in house. I'm specifically looking for people who can do: Itanium FreeBSD/i386 Windows (Cygwin, MingW, etc) I'm mainly interested in major

...e/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/archie-client/archie | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/plot2fig | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-04-22-Switch | * | * | SingleSource/UnitTests/2003-05-31-LongShifts...

...* 0.19 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/loader/loader | 0.1440 32264 0.2280 * 0.1440 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.16 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/plot2fig | 0.0880 14224 0.1040 * 0.0640 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * 0.09 | - - n/a n/a MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator | 0.4920 94412 0.6360 * 0.0600...

...30 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/loader/loader                          | > 0.0899 28276    0.1400      *                0.1199      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.00 *           0.14 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/plot2fig                      | > 0.0500 14756    0.0900      *                0.0999      |    0.00    0.00 >  0.01 *           0.11 | -       -       n/a          n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator                    | > 0.2600 64712    0.4000      *          ...

Hi Tanya, > 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects > directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a > pre-compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. I compiled llvm and llvm-gcc with separate objects directories. Platform is x86_64-linux-gnu. > 2) Run make check, report any failures (FAIL or unexpected pass). Note > that you need to

...- n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/loader/ > loader | 0.0899 28276 0.1400 > * 0.1199 | 0.00 0.00 0.00 * > 0.14 | - - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/ > plot2fig | 0.0500 14756 0.0900 > * 0.0999 | 0.00 0.00 0.01 * > 0.11 | - - n/a n/a > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/ > simulator | 0.2600 64712 0.4000...

LLVMers, 2.6 pre-release2 is ready to be tested by the community. http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.6/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. To test llvm-gcc: 1) Compile llvm from source and untar the llvm-test in the projects directory (name it llvm-test or test-suite). Choose to use a pre- compiled llvm-gcc or re-compile it yourself. 2) Run make check,

...rolangs-C/football/football MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/fsm/fsm MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/garage/garage MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/NP/np MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/objects/objects MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/office/office MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/plot2fig/plot2fig MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/shapes/shapes MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/simulator MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C++/trees/trees MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/unix-smail/unix-smail MultiSource/Benchmarks...

LLVMers, The 2.5 pre-release is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.5/ If you have time, I'd appreciate anyone who can help test the release. Please do the following: 1) Download/compile llvm source, and either compile llvm-gcc source or use llvm-gcc binary (please compile llvm-gcc with fortran if you can). 2) Run make check, send me the testrun.log 3) Run "make

LLVMers, The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ I'm looking for members of the LLVM community to test the 2.1 release. There are 2 ways you can help: 1) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the appropriate llvm-gcc4.0 binary. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite (make TEST=nightly report). 2) Download