search for: pleyad

...command "tc -s -d class show dev eth0" says that the value is 1499b/8 instead of the (correct?) 1500b/8. Is this right or am I doing anything wrong? Many thanks in advance :) Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net It''s my PC and I''ll cry if I want to...

I visited yesican.chsoft.biz and the author proposes a way to match packets by less than some size . Here is the thing: match u16 0x0000 0xffb0 at 2 With this match he says that packet with less than 80 bytes will match the rule. Well, 0xffb0 translates to 1111 1111 1011 0000 (which is -80 BTW). So, if I am correct any packet with bits 4 and/or 5 set (together with any of the 4

...Is there any better alternative to the above, given the great difference in rates and the fact that I won''t NEVER share bandwidth between 1:1 and 1:2? Thanks a lot in advance :) Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net It''s my PC and I''ll cry if I want to...

Hello all, I got this problem while trying to shape traffic with iptables MARK and HTB. MARK: targinfosize 8 != 4 --set-mark gives "invalid argument" error message. Kernel version is 2.4.29 (some patches from patch o matic applied) Iptables version 1.3.4 Intel x86 architecture. I saw this problem discussed in a few places, but the discussions didn''t come to a conclusion

I have found a few bugs in tc, and have produced patches for them. Two require changes to tc, one to the kernel. Where should I post these patches? -- Regards, Russell Stuart

Hi, all: I''m involved in the study about the QoS,but have some problems , hope someone could help me answer: 1. Why most traffic shaping implement in the egress side (Uplink) rather than the ingress side(Dnlink)?(e.g. why put the police rule on the smaller bandwidth side but not put on the larger side) 2. I can''t differ the functionalities exactly

...only difference is that the first one matches "at 20" and the second one "at nexthdr+0", which should be identical :????? What the heck am I doing wrong? Thanks a lot :) Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net It''s my PC and I''ll cry if I want to...

...then the first filter won''t work). What the heck am I doing wrong? Is iptables my only option? What''s the matter with "nexthdr"? Thanks a lot in advance :) Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net It''s my PC and I''ll cry if I want to...

...blem. I don''t want to use any other qdisc because I need a classful one and I don''t fully understand CBQ (I understand HTB MUCH better). Thanks again and pleased to meet you :) Raúl Núñez de Arenas Coronado -- Linux Registered User 88736 | http://www.dervishd.net http://www.pleyades.net & http://www.gotesdelluna.net It''s my PC and I''ll cry if I want to...

Hi All How to classify packets belonging to a FTP session? Port 21 session is easy. but what about data transfers? Their port numbers (both) are above 1024. I was thinking about ip_conntrack_ftp. Something like: iptables -A FORWARD -p tcp --sport 1024: --dport 1024: \ -m state --state ESTABLISHED,RELATED -j CLASSIFY --set-class X:Y But what if I also have ip_conntrack_irc, for instance.