search for: plessl

On 28.02.2011, at 15:44, Tobias Grosser wrote: > On 02/28/2011 05:27 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: >> Hi everyone >> >> I am teaching a lecture on hardware/software codesign which, though not a dedicated compiler course, covers quite a bit of compiler related contents (general introduction, intermediate code, code generation). >> >> I'm currently consid...

On 02/28/2011 05:27 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: > Hi everyone > > I am teaching a lecture on hardware/software codesign which, though not a dedicated compiler course, covers quite a bit of compiler related contents (general introduction, intermediate code, code generation). > > I'm currently considering replacing and/or...

Hi everyone I am teaching a lecture on hardware/software codesign which, though not a dedicated compiler course, covers quite a bit of compiler related contents (general introduction, intermediate code, code generation). I'm currently considering replacing and/or extending this compiler related lecture parts with an introduction to LLVM as an example for a modern compiler framework, which we

I guess even kaleidoscope would serve as a good tutorial -sanjiv On 24 May 2011 17:23, "Tobias Grosser" <grosser at fim.uni-passau.de> wrote: > > On 05/24/2011 05:18 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: > > > > On 28.02.2011, at 15:44, Tobias Grosser wrote: > > > >> On 02/28/2011 05:27 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: > >>> Hi everyone > >>> > >>> I am teaching a lecture on hardware/software codesign which, though not a dedicated com...

I'm looking for methods for generating LLVM bitcode from binaries (binary translation). I found two projects that seem to be related: vmkit and llvm-qemu a) Could someone shed some light on how the recently released vmkit works? Can vmkit be used for statically translating JVM or MSIL code to LLVM bitcode? Or is vmkit simply reusing LLVM's JIT execution engine, without ever

Hi all Last week, I performed some experiments using the python bindings to LLVM (http://code.google.com/p/llvm-py/). The goal of these experiments was to evaluate the usability of LLVM's scripting language bindings for code analysis and transformations. I found that the current version of the python bindings allows for loading, generating, JIT compiling and executing LLVM IR.

On 29.09.2008, at 11:53, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: > Watching this thread, it occurs to me that the "V" in "LLVM" is > creating > confusion. So far as I know, LLVM is the first project to use > "virtual" > to refer to the instruction set of the intermediate form. I understand > why this labeling made sense (sort of), but it was unfortunate. The

Hi Haifeng > I have a question about how to profile program with LLVM. When I tried > to compile the instrumented version of program after using "-insert- > block-profiling", I got > error complaining " undefined reference to > `llvm_start_block_profiling'. > > I found that there is a "runtime"directory in llvm source directory > but in the

On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 8:18 AM, Christian Plessl <christian.plessl at uni-paderborn.de> wrote: > - Is the architecture dependence of LLVM IR only an artifact of llvm- > gcc producing architecture dependent results? No. It also is an artifact of code compiling architecture and OS dependent features based on what they detect at config...

Due to a current need to have a git mirror for LLVM, I'm resurrecting this old thread. I'm aware that there exist already LLVM git mirrors at git://repo.or.cz/llvm.git and git://github.com/earl/llvm-mirror.git However, these repositories only mirror the current SVN trunk and do no provide any branch and tag information, which would be very convenient for creating experimental branches

Hi, all I have a question about how to profile program with LLVM. When I tried to compile the instrumented version of program after using "-insert-block-profiling", I got error complaining " undefined reference to `llvm_start_block_profiling'. I found that there is a "runtime"directory in llvm source directory but in the Makefile, it said llvm gcc 4 and above

On 2008-09-15, at 10:38, Christian Plessl wrote: > llvm-c could be extended to expose more details of the LLVM IR which > would allow more powerful program analysis and transformations. Yes. > But maybe this negates the design goals for llvm-c. No. > Is the functionality provided by llvm-c kept intentionally simple &gt...

On 01/28/10 09:49, Christian Plessl wrote: > Due to a current need to have a git mirror for LLVM, I'm resurrecting this old thread. > > I'm aware that there exist already LLVM git mirrors at git://repo.or.cz/llvm.git and git://github.com/earl/llvm-mirror.git However, these repositories only mirror the current SVN t...

On Sep 29, 2008, at 6:18 AM, Christian Plessl wrote: > On 29.09.2008, at 11:53, Jonathan S. Shapiro wrote: >> Watching this thread, it occurs to me that the "V" in "LLVM" is >> creating >> confusion. So far as I know, LLVM is the first project to use >> "virtual" >> to refer to the...

Time ago when the svn server was crawling due to massive hammering from people mirroring the repo, someone said that after the 2.6 release we could discuss creating official mirrors for those who work with svn clients based on distributed VCSs such as git and bazaar. Such mirrors increase productivity (facilitating experimentation and parallel tasks, allowing off-line work) and even lessens the

Hi all I'm currently porting some code to LLVM 2.6 and I stumbled over a weird problem with using JIT compilation in lli on Mac OS X 10.6.2. When running lli without any specific command line options it crashes with a segfault. When I specify "-force-interpreter" or "-march=x86-64", everything works as expected. I can reproduce the problem as follows: // hello.c int

Hi all I have a project where LLVM annotations could be very useful. My current understanding of LLVM in general is still limited, hence a nice interface to annotations or sample code that uses annotations would help me to get started. I was wondering what happened to the proposal for a better interface to handling of annotations, which has been discussed in this thread back in July.