Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "plattentest".
2019 Nov 06
2
samba performance when writing lots of small files
.../19 9:19 PM, Stefan Kania via samba wrote:
> try to use a newer version of Samba 4.7 is already outdated. The Problem
> the smb-protocol and not Samba it self. As Steve French mentioned on the
> last SambaXP it will be much better with Linux 5.x. So maybe you try a
> new kernel
root at plattentest:~# uname -a
Linux plattentest 5.3.0-18-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 8 20:14:06 UTC
2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
root at plattentest:~# dpkg -l samba
[?]
ii samba 2:4.10.7+dfsg-0ubuntu3 amd64 SMB/CIFS file,
print, and login server for Unix
root at plattentest:~# time for s...
2019 Nov 07
2
samba performance when writing lots of small files
...gt; This is re-exporting via ceph whilst creating 1000 files,
> yes ? What timings do you get when doing this via Samba
> onto a local ext4/xfs/btrfs/zfs filesystem ?
yes, creating 10k small files. doing the same on a local ssd, formatted
with an ext4 fs without any special options:
root at plattentest:/mnt-ssd/os# time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo $s >
test-$s; done
real 0m0.376s
user 0m0.130s
sys 0m0.246s
root at plattentest:/mnt-ssd/os#
and on the very same ssd, exported via cifs and re-mounted locally,
samba and share config are identical to the ceph test:
root at plattentest:/mnt-ss...
2019 Nov 06
0
samba performance when writing lots of small files
...samba wrote:
> > try to use a newer version of Samba 4.7 is already outdated. The Problem
> > the smb-protocol and not Samba it self. As Steve French mentioned on the
> > last SambaXP it will be much better with Linux 5.x. So maybe you try a
> > new kernel
>
> root at plattentest:~# uname -a
> Linux plattentest 5.3.0-18-generic #19-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 8 20:14:06 UTC
> 2019 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> root at plattentest:~# dpkg -l samba
> [?]
> ii samba 2:4.10.7+dfsg-0ubuntu3 amd64 SMB/CIFS file,
> print, and login server for Unix
>...
2019 Sep 25
2
samba performance when writing lots of small files
hi there,
running a simple test like
time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo hello > world-$s; done
takes a little more than a minute on a locally mounted test share on our
samba server. the same test finishes in about 5 seconds when it is run
on the server's file system, without samba.
i understand that dealing with many small files isn't exactly the sweet
spot of any (networked) file
2019 Nov 08
0
samba performance when writing lots of small files
...hilst creating 1000 files,
> > yes ? What timings do you get when doing this via Samba
> > onto a local ext4/xfs/btrfs/zfs filesystem ?
>
> yes, creating 10k small files. doing the same on a local ssd, formatted
> with an ext4 fs without any special options:
>
> root at plattentest:/mnt-ssd/os# time for s in $(seq 0 9999); do echo $s >
> test-$s; done
>
> real 0m0.376s
> user 0m0.130s
> sys 0m0.246s
> root at plattentest:/mnt-ssd/os#
>
> and on the very same ssd, exported via cifs and re-mounted locally,
> samba and share config are identical t...