search for: plaging

I was surprised to see that this hadn't made it to the samba list yet. Note I have not spent any time trying to confirm validity. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 1997 00:21:55 +0200 From: root <root@ADM.KIX-AZZ.ORG> To: BUGTRAQ@NETSPACE.ORG /* ___ ______ _ _ / \ | _ \ | \ / |

Si vous ne visualisez pas correctement l???e-mail, cliquez ici <http://url.mp32.ch/visu-90BD7B44-1B18-42B2-BB27-BF4B02C4DE10-203221958-356307-08042014.html> D??couvrez les nouveaux programmes immobiliers du Grand Ouest <http://url.mp32.ch/url-203221958-1612521-08042014.html> <http://url.mp32.ch/url-203221958-1612521-08042014.html> a s??lectionn?? pour vous les meilleurs

Si vous ne visualisez pas correctement l???e-mail, cliquez ici <http://url.mp32.ch/visu-C2035EE0-46EE-4FCF-9C8F-E48C8E5E008C-203221958-355072-03042014.html> RETROUVEZ-NOUS AU SALON NATIONAL DE L'IMMOBILIER ?? PARIS <http://url.mp32.ch/url-203221958-1607886-03042014.html> <http://url.mp32.ch/url-203221958-1607887-03042014.html> a s??lectionn?? pour vous les meilleurs

...ding, because it's not possible to have one single extension to fix the problems described above. Especially, if one considers this proposal aims for backward AND forward compatibility. The proposal isn't perfect, but in my opinion it's a fine step towards solving some of the problems plaging the projects surrounding Ogg. I propose that each project (Vorbis, Speex, etc.) states in its specification two file extensions, and those two extensions are to be the only ones allowed for that given format. Implementators are supposed to support both extensions. Content creators are supposed t...

...ding, because it's not possible to have one single extension to fix the problems described above. Especially, if one considers this proposal aims for backward AND forward compatibility. The proposal isn't perfect, but in my opinion it's a fine step towards solving some of the problems plaging the projects surrounding Ogg. I propose that each project (Vorbis, Speex, etc.) states in its specification two file extensions, and those two extensions are to be the only ones allowed for that given format. Implementators are supposed to support both extensions. Content creators are supposed t...

...ding, because it's not possible to have one single extension to fix the problems described above. Especially, if one considers this proposal aims for backward AND forward compatibility. The proposal isn't perfect, but in my opinion it's a fine step towards solving some of the problems plaging the projects surrounding Ogg. I propose that each project (Vorbis, Speex, etc.) states in its specification two file extensions, and those two extensions are to be the only ones allowed for that given format. Implementators are supposed to support both extensions. Content creators are supposed t...

...ding, because it's not possible to have one single extension to fix the problems described above. Especially, if one considers this proposal aims for backward AND forward compatibility. The proposal isn't perfect, but in my opinion it's a fine step towards solving some of the problems plaging the projects surrounding Ogg. I propose that each project (Vorbis, Speex, etc.) states in its specification two file extensions, and those two extensions are to be the only ones allowed for that given format. Implementators are supposed to support both extensions. Content creators are supposed t...

...ding, because it's not possible to have one single extension to fix the problems described above. Especially, if one considers this proposal aims for backward AND forward compatibility. The proposal isn't perfect, but in my opinion it's a fine step towards solving some of the problems plaging the projects surrounding Ogg. I propose that each project (Vorbis, Speex, etc.) states in its specification two file extensions, and those two extensions are to be the only ones allowed for that given format. Implementators are supposed to support both extensions. Content creators are supposed t...