Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "pl03".
Did you mean:
pl0
2016 Nov 28
3
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...655499-2026
Primary Group SID: S-1-5-21-2940660672-4062535256-4144655499-513
This group seems not to be converted, see server after classic upgrade:
# net groupmap list
#
-> no groups
This puts all these users into some new group:
# pdbedit -L | grep pl
pl01:4294967295:
pl02:4294967295:
pl03:4294967295:
pl04:4294967295:
pl05:4294967295:
while on the old server this was:
# pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
pl01:501:
pl02:502:
pl03:503:
pl04:504:
pl05:505:
Am I on the right track here?
2016 Nov 28
2
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...e group is called 'Domain Users' ;-)
>
> In AD, ALL users are members of 'Domain Users' but are not
> explicitly added to the 'Domain Users' object
>
>>
>> # pdbedit -L | grep pl
>>
>> pl01:4294967295:
>> pl02:4294967295:
>> pl03:4294967295:
>> pl04:4294967295:
>> pl05:4294967295:
>>
>> while on the old server this was:
>>
>> # pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
>>
>> pl01:501:
>> pl02:502:
>> pl03:503:
>> pl04:504:
>> pl05:505:
>>
>> Am I on the r...
2016 Nov 29
4
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...#39;Domain Users' ;-)
>
> In AD, ALL users are members of 'Domain Users' but are not
> explicitly added to the 'Domain Users' object
>
> >
> >
> > # pdbedit -L | grep pl
> >
> > pl01:4294967295:
> > pl02:4294967295:
> > pl03:4294967295:
> > pl04:4294967295:
> > pl05:4294967295:
> >
> > while on the old server this was:
> >
> > # pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
> >
> > pl01:501:
> > pl02:502:
> > pl03:503:
> > pl04:504:
> > pl05:505:
> >
>...
2016 Nov 28
0
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...se users into some new group:
Yes, and the group is called 'Domain Users' ;-)
In AD, ALL users are members of 'Domain Users' but are not
explicitly added to the 'Domain Users' object
>
> # pdbedit -L | grep pl
>
> pl01:4294967295:
> pl02:4294967295:
> pl03:4294967295:
> pl04:4294967295:
> pl05:4294967295:
>
> while on the old server this was:
>
> # pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
>
> pl01:501:
> pl02:502:
> pl03:503:
> pl04:504:
> pl05:505:
>
> Am I on the right track here?
>
Yes, you have found the reas...
2016 Nov 28
0
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...>
> > In AD, ALL users are members of 'Domain Users' but are not
> > explicitly added to the 'Domain Users' object
> >
> >>
> >> # pdbedit -L | grep pl
> >>
> >> pl01:4294967295:
> >> pl02:4294967295:
> >> pl03:4294967295:
> >> pl04:4294967295:
> >> pl05:4294967295:
> >>
> >> while on the old server this was:
> >>
> >> # pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
> >>
> >> pl01:501:
> >> pl02:502:
> >> pl03:503:
> >> pl04:...
2016 Nov 29
0
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...LL users are members of 'Domain Users' but are not
> > explicitly added to the 'Domain Users' object
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > # pdbedit -L | grep pl
> > >
> > > pl01:4294967295:
> > > pl02:4294967295:
> > > pl03:4294967295:
> > > pl04:4294967295:
> > > pl05:4294967295:
> > >
> > > while on the old server this was:
> > >
> > > # pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
> > >
> > > pl01:501:
> > > pl02:502:
> > > pl03:503:
> &...
2016 Nov 28
3
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:54:55 +0100
"Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Am 2016-11-28 um 10:27 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>
> > Have you read this:
> >
> > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Migrating_a_Samba_NT4_Domain_to_Samba_AD_%28Classic_Upgrade%29
> >
> > Particularly this part:
> >
> >