Displaying 8 results from an estimated 8 matches for "pl01".
Did you mean:
ol01
2016 Nov 28
3
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...-1-5-21-2940660672-4062535256-4144655499-2026
Primary Group SID: S-1-5-21-2940660672-4062535256-4144655499-513
This group seems not to be converted, see server after classic upgrade:
# net groupmap list
#
-> no groups
This puts all these users into some new group:
# pdbedit -L | grep pl
pl01:4294967295:
pl02:4294967295:
pl03:4294967295:
pl04:4294967295:
pl05:4294967295:
while on the old server this was:
# pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
pl01:501:
pl02:502:
pl03:503:
pl04:504:
pl05:505:
Am I on the right track here?
2016 Nov 28
2
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...se users into some new group:
>
> Yes, and the group is called 'Domain Users' ;-)
>
> In AD, ALL users are members of 'Domain Users' but are not
> explicitly added to the 'Domain Users' object
>
>>
>> # pdbedit -L | grep pl
>>
>> pl01:4294967295:
>> pl02:4294967295:
>> pl03:4294967295:
>> pl04:4294967295:
>> pl05:4294967295:
>>
>> while on the old server this was:
>>
>> # pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
>>
>> pl01:501:
>> pl02:502:
>> pl03:503:
>> pl04:504...
2016 Nov 29
4
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...e new group:
>
> Yes, and the group is called 'Domain Users' ;-)
>
> In AD, ALL users are members of 'Domain Users' but are not
> explicitly added to the 'Domain Users' object
>
> >
> >
> > # pdbedit -L | grep pl
> >
> > pl01:4294967295:
> > pl02:4294967295:
> > pl03:4294967295:
> > pl04:4294967295:
> > pl05:4294967295:
> >
> > while on the old server this was:
> >
> > # pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
> >
> > pl01:501:
> > pl02:502:
> > pl03:503:
&g...
2016 Nov 28
0
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...-> no groups
>
> This puts all these users into some new group:
Yes, and the group is called 'Domain Users' ;-)
In AD, ALL users are members of 'Domain Users' but are not
explicitly added to the 'Domain Users' object
>
> # pdbedit -L | grep pl
>
> pl01:4294967295:
> pl02:4294967295:
> pl03:4294967295:
> pl04:4294967295:
> pl05:4294967295:
>
> while on the old server this was:
>
> # pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
>
> pl01:501:
> pl02:502:
> pl03:503:
> pl04:504:
> pl05:505:
>
> Am I on the right tra...
2016 Nov 28
0
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...Yes, and the group is called 'Domain Users' ;-)
> >
> > In AD, ALL users are members of 'Domain Users' but are not
> > explicitly added to the 'Domain Users' object
> >
> >>
> >> # pdbedit -L | grep pl
> >>
> >> pl01:4294967295:
> >> pl02:4294967295:
> >> pl03:4294967295:
> >> pl04:4294967295:
> >> pl05:4294967295:
> >>
> >> while on the old server this was:
> >>
> >> # pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
> >>
> >> pl01:501:
>...
2016 Nov 29
0
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
...called 'Domain Users' ;-)
> >
> > In AD, ALL users are members of 'Domain Users' but are not
> > explicitly added to the 'Domain Users' object
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > # pdbedit -L | grep pl
> > >
> > > pl01:4294967295:
> > > pl02:4294967295:
> > > pl03:4294967295:
> > > pl04:4294967295:
> > > pl05:4294967295:
> > >
> > > while on the old server this was:
> > >
> > > # pdbedit -L | grep pl | sort
> > >
> > > pl...
2016 Nov 28
3
Samba on Debian 8; NT4 domain, win10
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 10:54:55 +0100
"Stefan G. Weichinger via samba" <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Am 2016-11-28 um 10:27 schrieb Rowland Penny via samba:
>
> > Have you read this:
> >
> > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Migrating_a_Samba_NT4_Domain_to_Samba_AD_%28Classic_Upgrade%29
> >
> > Particularly this part:
> >
> >
2008 Oct 07
7
Looking for testers and advise about ISOLINUX within ISO 9660
Hi,
we are the developers of an alternative to mkisofs:
program xorriso from libburnia-project.org .
The current development cycle is about support for
creating bootable CDs, DVDs, BDs. So we look for
testers and for advise about ISOLINUX specifics.
The example from the ISOLINUX wiki is supposed to
work if you replace "mkisofs" by "xorriso -as mkisofs".
I.e:
xorriso -as