Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "pkqx".
Did you mean:
pkmx
2006 Apr 20
0
Major internal changes, TI DSP build change
...as expecting some improvement from the
continuing work you have been doing on the fixed point build, but this is
really impressive, almost too good to be true. This is all straight
compiled C, after all (though the compiler has been updated also).
- Jim
-------------- next part --------------
PKQX?4??`h?Qti_dsp_11169.patch?<ks?J???*???????? ??J?]?@g??J?`????7'?}??!? d???[??? ??kz?{?["mgL?^??=????Y?h?;??j??g{?\.?)??{???m?!?j?????U,W?n]???\??????'?????R?_????E~????l????=? iu;????A?l
]na?????1????????sG?$??C? :h???
9?_??=??q?????7/???:m?t?
S??????P&??I?*A??J?/I?j\?7?=&?...
2006 Apr 19
2
Major internal changes, TI DSP build change
> You found it. The SHL32 (not SHR32) line fixes the problem. It must be
> doing a 16-bit shift, then extending the result (which is reasonable). As
> it happens, that it the same macro which gave us trouble last May
> (25th/26th), when the C55 build was more subtlely broken.
Yes, that's what I finally remembered. I think I've fixed all
occurrences (by adding EXTEND32)