Displaying 20 results from an estimated 70 matches for "pkgversions".
Did you mean:
pkgversion
2005 Mar 21
3
how to keep Asterisk up to date on many servers
Hi Everyone.
Asterisk is one of those applications that need to be built from cvs on a
regular basis to keep up with the changes. I have always used package
management tools like apt.
How does everyone manage their Asterisk servers?
Geoff
2012 Jan 23
1
[LLVMdev] Cross compilation error LLVM-3.0
Hi,
I am trying to cross compile LLVM-3.0 for Arm target i.e. I would like to
run the LLVM tools on ARM platform and generate the code for the ARM
platform. I configured the build with
../src/configure --build=i686-pc-linux-gnu --host=arm-linux-gnueabi
--target=arm-linux-gnueabi --enable-optimized=no
--prefix=/home/user/Acads/Compiler/LLVM/llvm-3.0/bin
--with-as=/usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-as
2009 Mar 18
2
Updating wine with GIT
Hi. Ive used git for some time to download an update wine sources. However, Ive notices a couple of things i dont understand quite much.
My general procedure to download sources and compile is this:
git clone git://source.winehq.org/git/wine.git ~/wine-git
cd ~/wine-git
./configure --prefix=/usr
make
sudo checkinstall --fstrans=no --pkgversion=1.1.12
Here I've noticed that I have to
2016 Feb 29
3
Possible soundness issue with available_externally (split from "RFC: Add guard intrinsics")
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Sanjoy Das
<sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
> Just as a reality check, I wrote up a demonstration where one link
> order causes a SIGFPE and another doesn't (and the program is well
> defined, as far as I can tell). All TUs are compiled with -O3. This is also
> an instance where we don't actually speculate an inline function,
2012 Jul 18
0
[LLVMdev] Setting up a cross-compiler for cortex-m3
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:15 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote:
> On 18 July 2012 14:57, salvatore benedetto
> <salvatore.benedetto at gmail.com> wrote:
>> $ clang -march=armv7-m -mfloat-abi=soft -ccc-host-triple
>> armv7m-none-gnueabi testReference.cpp -c
>> fatal error: error in backend: CPU: 'cortex-m3' does not support ARM
>>
2011 Mar 22
4
[LLVMdev] -emit-llvm on ubuntu is broken
Hi Eric,
here is my -emit-llvm -S -v output:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc-4.5
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/4.5.1/lto-wrapper
Target: i686-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro
4.5.1-7ubuntu2' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.5/README.Bugs
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,objc,obj-c++ --prefix=/usr
2013 Feb 21
4
[LLVMdev] make error building llvm/clang 3.2 on Linux
I'm attempting to build a native build of clang from the 3.2 source
distribution tarballs, but I ran into this build error that's got me
really puzzled. My platform is Linux - 32-bit Ubuntu (12.04) running
on a PC. Here's the (abbreviated) output from make:
***************************************
...
make[3]: Entering directory
2012 Jul 18
3
[LLVMdev] Setting up a cross-compiler for cortex-m3
On 18 July 2012 14:57, salvatore benedetto
<salvatore.benedetto at gmail.com> wrote:
> $ clang -march=armv7-m -mfloat-abi=soft -ccc-host-triple
> armv7m-none-gnueabi testReference.cpp -c
> fatal error: error in backend: CPU: 'cortex-m3' does not support ARM
> mode execution!
Ah, yes! Try:
$ clang -ccc-host-triple thumbv7m-none-gnueabi testReference.cpp -c
Cross
2012 Nov 20
1
Buffer overflow in date package
Dear list-members,
I have observed quite a strange problem with the date package.
You will find below what I get on my machine (Ubuntu). I have been able to
reproduce the error on Red Hat too. But it seems not to happen on Windows
(and on some other Linux distros?).
> require(date)
Loading required package: date
> sessionInfo()
R version 2.15.2 (2012-10-26)
Platform: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
2011 Nov 29
0
[LLVMdev] LLVM on ARM testing.
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:32 PM, Karel Gardas <karel.gardas at centrum.cz> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I asked here for kind of reference GCC version which LLVM development
> team is using for *native* testing on ARM hardware. (no cross
> compilation!) last week or so. I've been curious myself how the
> situation looks and so I tested LLVM 2.9 as a reference point and LLVM
>
2011 Mar 22
0
[LLVMdev] -emit-llvm on ubuntu is broken
Looks like something wonky with DragonEgg.
Duncan?
-eric
On Mar 21, 2011, at 7:05 PM, stackunderflow wrote:
>
> Hi Eric,
>
> here is my -emit-llvm -S -v output:
>
> Using built-in specs.
> COLLECT_GCC=gcc-4.5
> COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/4.5.1/lto-wrapper
> Target: i686-linux-gnu
> Configured with: ../src/configure -v
2017 Nov 27
2
Go Tsan check failure
Hi all,
I'm trying to build clang on Ubuntu 17.10 - the build succeeds, but
testing fails:
~/wk/LLVM/build_release$ svn info ../llvm/
Path: /home/csabaraduly/wk/LLVM/llvm
Working Copy Root Path: /home/csabaraduly/wk/LLVM/llvm
URL: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk
Relative URL: ^/llvm/trunk
Repository Root: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project
Repository UUID:
2013 Feb 26
0
[LLVMdev] make error building llvm/clang 3.2 on Linux
Hi Michael, you don't need compiler-rt to use clang. If you don't need it, I
suggest you don't bother building it.
Ciao, Duncan.
On 21/02/13 01:15, Michael Young wrote:
>
> I'm attempting to build a native build of clang from the 3.2 source
> distribution tarballs, but I ran into this build error that's got me
> really puzzled. My platform is Linux - 32-bit
2017 Nov 28
2
Go Tsan check failure
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 12:16 AM, Kostya Serebryany <kcc at google.com> wrote:
> +dvyukov
>
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 4:56 AM, Csaba Raduly via llvm-dev
> <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm trying to build clang on Ubuntu 17.10 - the build succeeds, but
>> testing fails:
>>
>> ~/wk/LLVM/build_release$
2012 Jul 18
0
[LLVMdev] Setting up a cross-compiler for cortex-m3
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Renato Golin <rengolin at systemcall.org> wrote:
> On 18 July 2012 15:24, salvatore benedetto
> <salvatore.benedetto at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm not sure how to interpret the above output, but I don't understand
>> why if say -triple armv4t-none--gnueabi .
>
> Ok, we're getting there... ;)
Glad you are confident.
2012 Jul 18
2
[LLVMdev] Setting up a cross-compiler for cortex-m3
On 18 July 2012 15:24, salvatore benedetto
<salvatore.benedetto at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure how to interpret the above output, but I don't understand
> why if say -triple armv4t-none--gnueabi .
Ok, we're getting there... ;)
I think these errors are due to Clang not finding the
libraries/includes/etc for the target you're building.
If you have
2016 Feb 29
0
Possible soundness issue with available_externally (split from "RFC: Add guard intrinsics")
Nice repro. It looks well-defined to me too.
Is there a PR open yet?
> On 2016-Feb-29, at 08:21, Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:41 PM, Sanjoy Das
> <sanjoy at playingwithpointers.com> wrote:
>> Just as a reality check, I wrote up a demonstration where one link
>> order causes a SIGFPE and another
2007 Jul 01
1
installing progs from source on CentOS
I'd like to install NagiosQL on CentOS, but I don't see a yum package
for it, so I'm going to download the source code.
If I download it, where in CentOS's file system (i.e. in which
directory) is the best place to untar, compile, and run it?
(Sorry, I've been spoiled by packages!)
2012 Aug 08
0
Building packages on SLES 11p2
Hi,
It would be great if the spec file could be updated to remove the dependency on python-ctypes for sles 11 since this seems to be included as part of the python package.
Also, there are lot of pragma warnings. It doesn't look like those pragma's work with the gcc on suse 11p2:
../../../../rpc/xdr/src/cli1-xdr.h:25: warning: unknown option after '#pragma GCC diagnostic' kind
2011 Mar 22
2
[LLVMdev] -emit-llvm on ubuntu is broken
Hi Eric,
> Looks like something wonky with DragonEgg.
you need to use -fplugin-arg-dragonegg-emit-ir or -flto with dragonegg,
not -emit-llvm. Also, you currently have to use -S (getting human readable
IR) rather than -c because with -c gcc will run cc1 with -S (getting human
readable IR) then pass the result to the system assembler which of course
barfs. This is documented on the web-page