search for: pkgdb

I am running 4.8-STABLE. I recently did a cvsup (repeatedly, most recently today). Ever since, portupgrade dies with the following messages: zircon# portupgrade -r pkgconfig /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:310:in `deorigin': failed to convert nil into String (PkgDB::DBError) from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:903:in `tsort_build' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:902:in `each' from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/pkgdb.rb:902:in `tso...

.... I'm running -stable, but haven't rebuilt the system in a year or so (I know, security vulerabilities, but the box has been shelved in this time). anyhow, at this point, I can't do even a make clean in ports, or build portupgrade. I fetched portupgrade with pkg_add hoping that running pkgdb -F would sort things out, but it errors with: ** Error occured reading /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf: undefined method `+' for nil next steps? jason watkins

I''d like to clarify some points about the ports/package system in FreeBSD. I apoligize ahead of time if this is Both packages and ports use the pkgdb system. This isn''t some lame cludge; it''s by design, and the reason is really quite simple. Packages are built from the ports collection. The only real difference between them is the mode of delivery. When you run ''make install'' from a port in the tree, it fet...

Hi all, Having a bit of a problem with portupgrade on a -STABLE machine: [root@erwin]/root: portupgrade -aRn ---> Session started at: Tue, 27 May 2003 22:54:00 +1000 closed stream ---> Session ended at: Tue, 27 May 2003 22:54:01 +1000 (consumed 00:00:01) [root@erwin]/root: pkgdb -F does the same thing. Any clues? cheers, Rob [root@erwin]/root: uname -a FreeBSD erwin.number6 4.8-STABLE FreeBSD 4.8-STABLE #1: Wed May 21 00:52:39 EST 2003 root@erwin.number6:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ERWIN alpha -- If it weren't for lawyers, I think we could have invented a universa...

Hi, I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel for this CentOS release as I have seen now: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/postgrey/ 1. Will I have to make an upgrade of the existing mail server to get security patches again or is it not critical to use the old package? 2. Can you give advice for an alternative setup of greylisting for postfix on CentOS 6? Cheers, Gabriele -------------- nex...

Our current build process requires the directfb-1.4.11-3.el6.i686.rpm and directfb-devel-1.4.11-3.el6.i686.rpm packages, but they appear to be no longer available from the EPEL repo, and I can?t find them anywhere else either. If you have a local copy, or can point me to some other repo or web site that has these 2 RPMs, I would really appreciate it. Thanks, Alfred

Am 28.01.2015 um 07:07 schrieb Philip Keogh: Hi Philip, > There's a .spec file that the author ran through mock on EL7: > https://github.com/mckern/carbon/blob/rpm_spec/rpm_spec/carbon.spec By author you mean the author of the RPM? > (If you need to know how to generate an RPM from a .spec see > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package ) Ta. > You can

...S X there are various i386-mingw32 packages in MacPorts: http://www.macports.org/ports.php?by=name&substr=mingw Here are the MacPorts installation instructions: http://www.macports.org/install.php Fedora has a lot of packages that have been built with MingW: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/list/?searchwords=mingw32* There doesn't seem to be a 64-bit port of MingW yet. I would expect GNU Binutils to support 64-bit Windows if you built its source yourself - is that the case? The key part of MingW that makes Windows development possible on so many other platforms is that the...

Don Quixote de la Mancha <quixote at dulcineatech.com> writes: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 7:35 PM, Ivan Krasin <krasin at google.com> wrote: >> I'm not related to the topic starter, but I see at least one huge >> disadvantage of the dependency on link.exe. >> W/o such a dependency it would be possible reliably generate Windows >> executables on Linux or

...e: > > I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. > > Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. > > > > But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel > > for this CentOS release as I have seen now: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/postgrey/ > > > > 2. Can you give advice for an alternative setup > > of greylisting for postfix on CentOS 6? > > Postgrey is largely obsoleted by postscreen which comes with postfix > versions 2.8 and up. You can get the latest postfix (including &g...

Hi all, I''ve finally gotten around to releasing Facter 1.5. As the version bump implies, this is a relatively significant release (for a 2.3k line program, anyway). Mostly, the biggest change is refactoring the code internally so that all of the functionality is split into separate classes in separate files. Also, the facts are all loaded on-demand, which provides dramatic

I fixed a couple issues in the RedHat init script provided in the scripts directory. There are some other things about it that could use updating, but first I checked out the one included with the RPM (https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/nut). That one looks pretty good, maybe it should replace the included scripts if permission is given by mhlavink? -------------- next part -------------- --- /root/sources/nut-2.6.5/scripts/RedHat/upsd 2012-07-31 10:38:56.000000000 -0700 +++ /etc/init.d/upsd 2013-09-24 16:36:42.000000...

...2016 at 04:30:25PM +0000, Devloo, Ivan wrote: > Hi Sir, > > I'd like to install the ldmtool on Redhat linux 7. > > Any reason why it is not in the yum repository. > > Many thanks for your feedback, It's not available in RHEL or EPEL. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libldm/ You'll have to add it: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/FAQ#Contributing_to_EPEL Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of...

...ss, see their web site (which also contains a procedure for getting package updates created and finding the maintainer of a package that you are interested in): https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL/GuidelinesAndPolicies In the case of graphite-web, that data is here: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/graphite-web/ The package has been approved for inclusion in EPEL 7 but was not yet built/released and is not in testing. (as per guidelines minimum of 2 weeks in testing prior to release) The only person who can give you their plans for a specific package is the point of contact package...

...4/16 02:13, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. > Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. > > But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel > for this CentOS release as I have seen now: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/postgrey/ > > 1. Will I have to make an upgrade of the existing mail server > to get security patches again or is it not critical to > use the old package? You will have to get advice from the epel peopel for support for postgrey. > 2. Can you give advice for an...

Dear CentOS community, Due to efforts of Fedora maintainers ASL ( http://asl.org.il/ ) entered EPEL7 ( libASL ) today and now can be easily installed and deployed: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libASL/ All the best, Zeev About ASL --------- Advanced Simulation Library (ASL) is a free and open source hardware accelerated multiphysics simulation platform (and an extensible general purpose tool for solving Partial Differential Equations). Its computational engine is written...

...r available from the EPEL repo, and I can?t find them anywhere else either. If you have a local copy, or can point me to some other repo or web site that has these 2 RPMs, I would really appreciate it. This is how you can find them: I went to the package directory: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/directfb/ They are all retired, but when you click on the builds status, you still see the old builds. click on the last build for Epel6, and you find https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=665511 which has the download links for all architectures. hope this helps, Ti...

On Dec 16, 2016, at 9:11, Timotheus Pokorra <timotheus.pokorra at solidcharity.com> wrote: > This is how you can find them: > I went to the package directory: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/directfb/ > They are all retired, but when you click on the builds status, you > still see the old builds. > click on the last build for Epel6, and you find > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=665511 > which has the download links for all architecture...

On Wednesday 06 October 2010 00:44:18 Jonathan Nalley wrote: > Could you use a site like pastebin.com to show us what your init > script looks like that you've tried? > > Although the typical init script is certainly more preferable, you > could always just append that command you know to be working to > /etc/rc.local although you may want to direct stdout and stderr >

Anyone know of NUT (the ups tools) packages for Centos 5 or RHEL 5? Thanks! -- ---- Fred Smith -- fredex at fcshome.stoneham.ma.us ------------------------ ---- Do you not know? Have you not heard? The LORD is the everlasting God, the Creator of the ends of the earth. He will not grow tired or weary, and his understanding no one can fathom.