search for: pizzaboxes

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "pizzaboxes".

2011 Oct 25
4
[LLVMdev] is anyone using the sparc backend?
...I completely agree that we shouldn't remove the sparc target. However, it is currently unmaintained, and has some pretty glaring bugs. Is anyone interested in stepping up to maintain the target? > > -Chris We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. Pawel Wodnicki > On Oct 25, 2011, at 6:35 AM, Vikram Adve wrote: >> Sparc is a popular target for architecture simulators, and removing that back end would force people using such simulators to use some other compiler infrastructure. Sparc is als...
2011 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] is anyone using the sparc backend?
Hi Pawel, > We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! > > My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. there are three sparc buildbots which are hooked up to lab.llvm.org. They are currently idle because no builders have been scheduled to use them: # gcc54 36G 0.5 GHz TI UltraSparc IIe (Hummingbird) / 1.5 GB RAM / Sun Netra T1 200 / Debian sparc...
2011 Oct 26
0
[LLVMdev] is anyone using the sparc backend?
...houldn't remove the sparc target. However, it is currently unmaintained, and has some pretty glaring bugs. Is anyone interested in stepping up to maintain the target? >> >> -Chris > > We can not let it die and I volunteer to keep the Sparc alive! > > My SPARCstation pizzaboxes can be ready for action in a day or two. Fantastic. A great place to start would be to investigate / screen various sparc related bugs in bugzilla to see if they are still relevant and present: http://llvm.org/bugs/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=sparc This bug looks pretty fatal if it is actually real:...
2005 Sep 14
3
SunFire X2100 and X4100
Anyone seen either of these "in the wild" yet? RHEL3/RHEL4 are install options so I'm assuming CentOS will just work out of the box, but I thought I'd ask here. The 2100 seems like a viable alternative to whitebox 1RU boxes that we currently use, especially with the new dual core processors. Cheers,
2011 Jul 13
4
[Bug 728] New: ip_tables: limit match: invalid size 40!=48
http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728 Summary: ip_tables: limit match: invalid size 40!=48 Product: netfilter/iptables Version: linux-2.6.x Platform: mips64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ip_tables (kernel) AssignedTo:
2003 Jun 24
3
Greetings I'm trying to install FreeBSD on a HP Cluster Server. But when I boot with the CD's ( 4.4, 4.8 & 5.0 ), it will boot all the way upto "Wait 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle" and then it immedialty give the following message:
Greetings I'm trying to install FreeBSD on a HP Cluster Server. But when I boot with the CD's ( 4.4, 4.8 & 5.0 ), it will boot all the way upto "Wait 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle" and then it immedialty give the following message: (noperiph:sym0:0:-1:-1):SCSI BUS reset delivered. (noperiph:sym1:0:-1:-1):SCSI BUS reset delivered. After this the machine is
2011 Mar 04
13
cannot replace c10t0d0 with c10t0d0: device is too small
In 2007 I bought 6 WD1600JS 160GB sata disks and used 4 to create a raidz storage pool and then shelved the other two for spares. One of the disks failed last night so I shut down the server and replaced it with a spare. When I tried to zpool replace the disk I get: zpool replace tank c10t0d0 cannot replace c10t0d0 with c10t0d0: device is too small The 4 original disk partition tables look like