Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "pixxi".
2008 Apr 23
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave2
...that we need to measure performance to
> ensure there is no significant performance regression.
Dan, Chris,
finally I am in possession of hard performance data on
a realistic testcase (kimwitu++).
I have 20 measurements regading trunk LLVM and 5 with my changes
merged in:
###### TRUNK + DIET
pixxi:~ ggreif$ cat kimwituFastDiet50147.scatter|grep user|sort
user 1m25.404s
user 1m25.453s
user 1m25.454s
user 1m25.526s
user 1m25.973s
###### TRUNK
pixxi:~ ggreif$ cat kimwituRegular.scatter.backup|grep user|sort
user 1m25.127s
user 1m25.132s
user 1m25.147s
user 1m25.160s...
2008 Apr 17
2
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave2
On Apr 16, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Dan Gohman wrote:
>> So, my idea is that these changes are performance neutral.
I strongly agree with Dan that we need to measure performance to
ensure there is no significant performance regression.
>> I hope that this is interesting, but I'd like to ask anybody who is
>> comfortable with performance testing to help provide some hard
2008 Apr 04
0
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, heisenbug wrote:
>> point taken. thanks!
>
>
> Whatever I try I get something like this:
>
> ggreif$ cd MultiSource/
> ggreif$ make
> make[2]: *** No rule to make target `Output/be.bc', needed by `Output/
> burg.linked.rbc'. Stop.
> make[1]: *** [Burg/.makeall] Error 2
> make: *** [Applications/.makeall] Error 2
This is the
2008 Apr 04
3
[LLVMdev] PATCH: Use size reduction -- wave1
On Apr 4, 8:06 pm, heisenbug <ggr... at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 7:51 pm, Török Edwin <edwinto... at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > heisenbug wrote:
> > > On Apr 3, 10:53 pm, Gabor Greif <ga... at mac.com> wrote:
> > > ...
>
> > >>> 3) Make sure that make check and some reasonable subset of llvm-test
> > >>>