Displaying 20 results from an estimated 614 matches for "pitfals".
Did you mean:
pitfalls
2010 Apr 16
2
Any pitfalls updating straight from 3.0.34 to 3.5.2?
Okay, so I've just put the sernet repo file in my yum.repos.d directory and a yum update will elevate my samba server to the latest version. Is there any pitfall that is out there that I can avoid before yum updating.
Centos 5.3
samba3-3.0.34-37 & related packages
openldap-2.3.43-3.el5 & related packages
I still have my samba3-3.0.34 packages squirreled away so I can force downgrade
2013 Oct 22
3
htdocs on NFS share / any pitfalls?
Hi all,
i have a new setup where the htdocs directory for the webserver
is located on a nfs share. Client has cachefilesd configured.
Compared to the old setup (htdocs directory is on the local disk)
the performance is not so gratifying. The disk is "faster" compared
to the ethernet link but the cache should at least compensate this
a bit. Do they exist more pitfalls for such
2006 Jul 28
1
Nasty pitfall: don''t use ^ and $ in validation regexes!
Let''s say you want to validate that an attribute contains only 2-10
lowercase characters, e.g. with validates_format_of. The appropriate
regex is obviously /^[a-z]{2,10}$/, right?
Wrong! Try it with "abc\nANYTHING YOU LIKE" - this is perfectly valid.
On the second look the reason is clear: ^ matches the start of a line, $
matches the end of a line. So as long as one line in
2003 Dec 09
0
group mappings pitfalls in samba 3
I have recently run across this problem and would like to warn people about it. I had an
already established domain running under Samba 2.2.8. I then upgraded to 3.0. I removed
the 'domain admin users = root' line from my smb.conf because certain tools complained
about it being there. After the upgrade, I followed the Samba 3 HOWTO docs on samba.org. I
created my domadm, domguests, and
2010 Jan 29
5
[LLVMdev] Distribution in assembler format
One issue I've been looking at with regard to using LLVM as a compiler
backend is distribution of programs, particularly on Linux where
different distributions have different binary package formats and it
is usual to ship programs as source rather than binary; specifically,
I'm looking at the general case where the end user may not have (the
correct version of) LLVM installed, so the
2010 Jan 29
0
[LLVMdev] Distribution in assembler format
Hello Russell,
Major pitfall #1:
LLVM-GCC does certain optimizations even if all of the optimizations are turned off. These include endian-specific optimizations so to use LLVM as a cross-architecture bitcode, you'll need to wait until Clang supports C++ fully or just stick to C programs for now.
I've been looking forward to the day that LLVM can be used for cross-architecture
2011 Apr 06
2
realtime mysql for 1.8
Hi,
I'm going to have a go with realtime mysql.
Just wondering, most examples i came across while googling, was with 1.6
systems.
So any drastic changes with 1.8.3, table-layout? other pitfalls?
hw
2016 Jun 22
3
Mailboxes on NFS or iSCSI
Hello,
we are running Dovecot (2.2.13-12~deb8u1) on Debian stable. Configured
with Mailbox++, IMAP, POP3, LMTPD, Managesieved, ACL. Mailboxes are on
local 1.2TB RAID, it's about 5310 accounts.
We are slowly getting out of space and we are considering to move
Mailboxes onto Netapp disk array with two independent network connections.
Are there some pitfalls? Not sure we should use NTP or
2007 Aug 02
5
new CentOS 5 as DNS server
Hi folks,
As a breather from the
"thread-now-wider-than-my-headers-window-in-thunderbird" conversation
re: mixing repos, I have a question regarding a machine I'm about to put
online. :)
I run a web hosting company and my secondary (primary to the world) DNS
box died from a massive rootkit/hack last night. It was running an old
Slackware 9.1 installation and I will be completely
2025 Jan 16
1
Samba in a dual boot environment
On Thu, 16 Jan 2025 16:44:16 +0100
Christian Naumer via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> I'll try to describe the "pitfalls":
>
> * You need to have your data on a separate partition with the NTFS
> file system -> Windows can only read these.
>
> * You need to mount that partition under Linux. That works, BUT ACL
> support is limited and
2025 Jan 16
1
Samba in a dual boot environment
I'll try to describe the "pitfalls":
* You need to have your data on a separate partition with the NTFS file
system -> Windows can only read these.
* You need to mount that partition under Linux. That works, BUT ACL
support is limited and interaction with Samba and NTFS might have issues
if your ACLs are complex. Then you need to share that partition or a
directory on there
2009 Mar 23
6
[OT] Network switches
I'm looking to acquire a few new core switches for our network which
would be a major upgrade from the cheap unmanaged things we currently
have. Basically, just users, servers, and other simple network devices
will be plugged into them but I'd like to start doing some testing with
iSCSI for various non-production reasons. I have no allegiance to a
particular vendor although I do have a
2009 Apr 23
11
Puppet on busybox, Bob Hope or No Hope?
When I say busybox it''s actually VMware ESX server which seems to use
busybox (which I guess is the case a number of other software appliances) .
Reason for wanting to install puppet is to run the cli tools to create
nightly vmware snapshots.
I''m happy to give it a go (and add the docs to the wiki) but I''m not too
sure at this stage how big a task this might be and what,
2010 Jan 29
3
[LLVMdev] Distribution in assembler format
I don't think I quite understand this... suppose for example you're
trying to use an LLVM-based toolchain running on an x86 PC to write
code for a device that uses an ARM processor in big endian mode, so
you tell the LLVM code generator "generate code for ARM, big
endian"... are you saying the optimizer will actually assume the
target device is little endian because the
2014 Feb 26
3
Upgrading from 1.2.x -> 2.2.x in one step possible
Hi,
after some off-ML discussions to and some reconsiderations, we might do
the "big jump" from our current 1.2.17 to the atrpms 2.2.
From googling and reading the dovecot upgrade wiki I don't see any (big)
pitfalls.
Basically we use the default config options, mbox, pop3s/imaps on RH EL 5.
So "just" run the upgrade-config script, fingers crossed and thats it?
Ii it
2011 Nov 30
4
Replacing gateway, is it bad idea?
Hi all,
I have plan to replace my Centos5.7 VM with newer version.
The VM works as our network gateway.
I want to ask from your experience, will it be a bad decision? My
concern is that since the Mac Address of the gateway will change, will
it disrupt the network?
How fast the Switches can recognize the new mac? Any other pitfall?
Thanks
Fajar.
2019 Nov 28
3
Using dovecot Replication in a medium to large enterprise.
Good day Guys
Just wanted to pick the communities brain and experience(s) for a second.
At $CORP where I work. My team has inherited a single server mail solution.
We need to look to building a standby / replicated solution.
One of the things we were looking at is https://wiki.dovecot.org/Replication
We have in excess of +/- 500 mail boxes and using just under 1TB of disk
space. That is a
2004 Oct 29
3
question about R on Linux Cluster
Hi, I am in trying to get a new Linux Cluster. I am
thinking about putting R on it. Does anyone have any
experience with running R on a distributed Linux
Cluster? Or does R support a cluster environment at
all. Any pitfall I should really watch out for?
Thanks in advance
Apollo
2009 Apr 24
2
Asterisk & EC2
Has anyone been able to get asterisk 1.6 running under Xen or Amazon EC2?
If yes, can you share your experience please? Is it usable in a production
environment? How is the sound quality? Am I likely to suffer from latency
issues if the extensions are not located in the US?
Any pitfall that I should be aware of?
Cheers
--
Aryan Ameri
2011 Nov 03
2
Centos Firewall - router with virtual IP
Hi all,
I haven't found anything in Google about this.
I'm creating a firewall router with Centos with few virtual IP using iptables.
May I ask for your experience?
Is there any pitfall or bad side of using virtual IP for this purpose?
I'm using few virtual IP to accommodate few subnets that go through
this firewall/router.
Thank you.
Fajar.