search for: pirqs

...r_pirq[vector] = pirq; done: + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&desc->lock, flags); return ret; } @@ -139,18 +127,18 @@ static int unmap_domain_pirq(struct doma unsigned long flags; irq_desc_t *desc; int vector, ret = 0; - - if ( d == NULL || pirq < 0 || pirq >= NR_PIRQS ) + bool_t forced_unbind; + + if ( (pirq < 0) || (pirq >= NR_PIRQS) ) return -EINVAL; if ( !IS_PRIV(current->domain) ) return -EINVAL; - ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&d->arch.irq_lock)); + ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&d->evtchn_lock)); vector = d...

Hello, More information and a patch for the bug. -- Pasi ----- Forwarded message from George Dunlap <George.Dunlap at eu.citrix.com> ----- From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap at eu.citrix.com> To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich at novell.com> Cc: Sander Eikelenboom <linux at eikelenboom.it>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy at goop.org>, Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang at

Accelerated msix entry is initialized to zero when msixtbl_pt_register is called. This doesn''t match the value from qemu side, although pirq may already be mapped and binded in qemu side. Kernel will get wrong value when reading msix info. Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@oracle.com> Tested-by: Yuval Shaia <yuval.shaia@oracle.com> --- tools/libxc/xc_domain.c

The hypervisor side changes for XSA-46 require the tool stack to now always map the guest pIRQ before granting access permission to the underlying host IRQ (GSI). This in particular requires that pciif.py no longer can skip this step (assuming qemu would do it) for HVM guests. This in turn exposes, however, an inconsistency between xend and qemu: The former wants to always establish 1:1 mappings

There is a BUG_ON() at xen/arch/x86/physdev.c:169 which appears to be dependent upon guest behavior (should close event channel before un-mapping pirq), rather than on internal hypervisor state. In 2.6.18, this likely goes unnoticed because pci_device_shutdown() only calls all the driver shutdown routines. In newer kernels, however, it also calls pci_msi_shutdown() and pci_msix_shutdown(), which

In pirq_check_eoi_map use the pirq number rather than the Linux irq number to check whether an eoi is needed in the pirq_eoi_map. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> Tested-by: Tobias Geiger <tobias.geiger@vido.info> --- drivers/xen/events.c | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/xen/events.c

Hi, everyone! We google a lot, but can''t find how to config the pvscsi on our ubuntu13.04 PV on HVM.There are some links http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Paravirtualized_SCSI http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Configuration_File_Options And we use the config option above Configure PVSCSI devices vscsi = [ ''/dev/sdc, 0:0:0:0'' ] I pass sdc to the hvm, but in our pvhvm (ubuntu13.04)

Hi- I am trying to pass an LSI SAS2008-based HBA (IBM M1015) through to an HVM Solaris VM, using Xen 4.2 unstable and the qemu-traditional device model. On boot I see the following error: MPT BIOS Fault 09h encountered at adapter PCI(00h,05h,00h) A list search yielded (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/128172), however there was no solution for an HVM VM. I''ve

PV on HVM guests map GSIs into event channels; at restore time the event channels are resumed by restore_pirqs. Device drivers might try to register the same GSI again through ACPI at restore time, but the GSI has already been mapped and bound by restore_pirqs. This patch detects these situations and avoid mapping the same GSI multiple times. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citr...

about VIRQ &amp; PIRQ what is VIRQ  ?How VIRQ is different from PIRQ ?How VIRQ &amp; PIRQ are related each other ? DISCLAIMER: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The contents of this e-mail and any attachment(s) are confidential and intended for the named recipient(s) only. It shall not attach any

Hello, I''ve previously been successful with Xen4 and VT-d on other systems. I am having trouble getting VT-d passthrough working to a WinXP domain with DX58SO (Q45) motherboard and i7 930 CPU. VT-d is enabled in bios, xm info shows hvm_directio capability, I have iommu=1 set, I have the devices bound to pciback on dom0 cmdline, xm pci-list-assignable-devices shows the devices as

Hello, I''ve previously been successful with Xen4 and VT-d on other systems. I am having trouble getting VT-d passthrough working to a WinXP domain with DX58SO (Q45) motherboard and i7 930 CPU. VT-d is enabled in bios, xm info shows hvm_directio capability, I have iommu=1 set, I have the devices bound to pciback on dom0 cmdline, xm pci-list-assignable-devices shows the devices as

Currently the vector is not freed for MSI interrupt, the three patches fix the issue. The first patch(pirq.patch) move the get_free_pirq/map(unmap)_domain_pirq from arch/x86/physdev.c to arch/x86/irq.c, since that should be part of irq managment, no logic changes. The second patch(msi_vector_clean.patch) free the vector when the pirq is unmapped or when domain destroy. One thing need notice for

Hello, I''m trying to compile Xen unstable on NetBSD, I''ve aplied the patches from http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/sysutils/xentools41/patches/?only_with_tag=MAIN and copied the blk files from http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/pkgsrc/sysutils/xentools41/files/?only_with_tag=MAIN (I don''t know which of these patches have been applied to xen unstable, so

Support PV on HVM MSIX remapping The technique is the same used with MSI: if the guest enables an MSIX passing 0 as vector number, then read the address and use it as pirq number for the following mapping request to Xen. Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@eu.citrix.com> diff --git a/hw/pt-msi.c b/hw/pt-msi.c index f0fb3e3..b01744e 100644 --- a/hw/pt-msi.c +++

Hello. log of the crashing boot process: http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-bootlog-14-xen331-linux-2.6.29-rc6-crash.txt 2.6.29-rc5 based pv_ops dom0 works on the same computer.. with the same Xen version. I tried with and without pci=nomsi. adding ''noapic'' doesn''t seem to help (I need that with 2.6.29-rc5 to make it work). Any ideas

This patch enables PCI passthrough with stub domain. PCI passthrough with stub domain has failed in the past. The primary reason is that hypercalls from qemu in stub domain are rejected. This patch allows qemu in stub domain to call the hypercalls which is needed for PCI passthrough. For security, if target domain of hypercall is different from that of stub domain, it rejects hypercall. To use

Ian, I came across the subject line on a 96GB server with over 85 VMs running. Completely frozen and unresponsive, qemu-dm processes hung on event channels. I''m using the XenServer 6.0 dom0 kernel on top of the xen-unstable tip hypervisor. I believe you solved the issue backporting some event channel patches to the 2.6.32 kernel, as described in this thread

mk_pirq_info(), gsi_from_irq() and vector_from_irq() are static functions and no one is calling them. This fixed following compilation warnings : drivers/xen/events.c:134: warning: ?mk_pirq_info? defined but not used drivers/xen/events.c:180: warning: ?gsi_from_irq? defined but not used drivers/xen/events.c:190: warning: ?vector_from_irq? defined but not used Signed-off-by: Jaswinder

mk_pirq_info(), gsi_from_irq() and vector_from_irq() are static functions and no one is calling them. This fixed following compilation warnings : drivers/xen/events.c:134: warning: ?mk_pirq_info? defined but not used drivers/xen/events.c:180: warning: ?gsi_from_irq? defined but not used drivers/xen/events.c:190: warning: ?vector_from_irq? defined but not used Signed-off-by: Jaswinder