search for: pinux

Hello, I'm checking some Billing Software for Asterisk. In opensource I only know (the name, I haven't used) AstBill. What other software should I check with similar capabilities? Thank you! -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

...users aprox. We think that Pentium 4 3GHz and 1GB of RAM should be enough. Only Asterisk running. We wonder if somebody has some other experience, good or bad. We will use Asterisk 1.2 (it is a small and short project for only this). Thanks! -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

...very well) Another things: iptables is not a problem for sure, and I also did: echo 1 >/proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/eth0/proxy_arp echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/conf/tan0/proxy_arp Thank you very much! -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...sign of Dovecot I could do what I did in a very simple way. Actually Dovecot design was as I would have designed for this use case (the index file, subscription from the mailing list, etc.). Thank you very much again! and thanks for the great Dovecot as well! -- Carles Pina i Estany Web: http://pinux.info || Blog: http://pintant.cat GPG Key 0x8CD5C157

...is is correct, increasing CPU number of Asterisk server box would not increase the performance. I don't see any other process that could use other Cores (like transcoding processes, executing dialplan, etc.) Thank you for your information, -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

...t;Warning" message, something like "some interruptions has been lost at 1024Hz" (aprox.). Any clue where to check? USB modules are the same than other machine... We was completely confused about it (how to fix, I mean). Thanks! -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

...ject/person/firm trying to send SMS using Protocol 2? Thank you very much, PD: some guy from Asterisk-es said to me that it seems that Telefonica wants to implement Protocol 1 too... but I don't have any information about deadlines, etc... -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

...see that this IP packets are sent using my public IP address (-j MASQUERADE, same effect if I use -j SNAT --to-address my_address) Any clue? Why is it happening? I think that I''m having all possible problems using Xen :-) Thank you! -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...k that I shouldn't need redirected ports because I was trying to call, not to receive calls. And NAT problem should be that I can listen but not talk (or vice-versa...) Any idea about what I can check? Any suggestion? Tahnk you very much, -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

...tionen-chanspy.html That is only available for Asterisk 1.4. I wonder if there is any way to emulate it in Asterisk 1.2. For example, to "join" two calls: one to use a private whisper and other one to use a normal chanspy. Thank you, -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

...No (d) Rx: BYE IP_PEER dst_number2 something2 00102/00103 unkn No (d) Rx: BYE We are using ASterisk 1.2.x When I say "a lot" I mean more than 180, more than 230, etc. Is it normal? How we can remove it? Thank you very much, -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

...somebody could tell me why this is happening? I browsed in internet to find some bugreport with same behaviour without any luck. I would like to find some bug report with same problem and fine that is fixed for next Asterisk version :-) Thanks, -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

...would like to access to the content of this header from Asterisk. How I can access to Reason header content? I would like to access here using ASterisk 1.4 and 1.2, but if it's only with Asterisk 1.4 will not be a big problem. Thank you, -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

The client is travelling much of the time. Is there some way that he can use Port 80 so that the firewalls that he is behind won't block the connection? Any other hints or suggestions are very welcome!

...a "click" while talking. Well, more than a click it seems that voice is missing during some ms (maybe 100 ms?) Using G711 we don't have any click. Where we could watch for it? Is it possible to add some Jitter buffer? Thank you, -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

....conf section: [2.2.2.2] host=2.2.2.2 type=friend insecure=yes context=test canreinvite=no (and calls goes to test context) Which header is forcing Asterisk to ask for authentication, and if I hide the callerid it's not asking it? Thanks, -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x17756391 http://pinux.info

...version. I am sure that here somebody has had this problem and can send any suggestion to me. Thank you very much, PD: if it is needed tomorrow I will send Kernel version, Fedora Version, Samba version. But maybe anybody has any suggestion. -- Carles Pina i Estany GPG id: 0x8CBDAE64 http://pinux.info Manresa - Barcelona

...6 345355 ESTABLISHED src=asdfasdf8 dst=asdf sport=2649 dport =4662 src=sdfasd dst=dfdf sport=4662 dport=2649 [ASSURED] use=1 How can I "flush" all connection track? I have compiled iptables into kernel, not as module. Any ideas? Thank you very much! ---- Carles Pina i Estany | Nick: Pinux / Pine / Teufeus E-Mail: carles.pina@salleURL.edu / is08139@salleURL.edu / cpina@cat-linux.com http://www.salleURL.edu/~is08139/ 286+100=386 +100=486 +100=585.00000011. Well...let''s call it Pentium.

Hello all.. Using dtrace on solaris 10, i could investigate a performance issue with the sincronization of some files on a ZFS filesystem. I have started the follow rsync command (inside a gnome-terminal): /opt/sfw/bin/rsync -av -e ssh user@IP:/DirA/DirB . The current directory(.), was a ZFS pool with two SATA discs (mirror)... The performance was terrible. After some tests with raid0,