search for: pincpu

I have a 2 way machine. Soliciting folks opinion on whether it makes sense to smp enable DOM0 so that IO handling can be balanced over both CPU''s... Opinions? Thanks, Scott _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

Hi everyone, I''m running Xen on an SMP machine. Couple of things: a) is dom0 pinned to a particular CPU? if so which? can I control the choice? b) with the 2.6.10 Xenolinux kernel, cat /proc/cpuinfo shows only a single CPU on my SMP machine. Is this a known problem/behavior? c) if I understand correctly, the BVT scheduler parameters are CPU specific -- they don''t aggregate

Hi All, I''ve been looking through the code and list archives but haven''t found this yet... From dom0, how do you cause a virtual domain to gracefully shutdown? It seems like the machinery is there somewhere, because the hypervisor can do it to dom0... For reference, in UML you do this by putting this in /etc/inittab: ca:12345:ctrlaltdel:/sbin/shutdown -h now ...and then

I''ve put together two patches. The first introduces a new dom0_op, set_max_vcpus, which with an associated variable and a check in the VCPUOP handler fixes [1]bug 288. Also included is a new VCPUOP, VCPUOP_create, which handles all of the vcpu creation tasks and leaves initialization and unpausing to VCPUOP_initialize. The separation allows for build-time allocation of vcpus which