search for: pilkington

On 6/22/17 7:50 AM, Joerg Sonnenberger via llvm-dev wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 04:42:40PM -0700, Erik Pilkington via llvm-dev wrote: >> I've been working on fixing this by parsing first into an AST structure, and >> then traversing that AST to produce a demangled string. This provides a >> significant performance improvement and also make the demangler somewhat >> more clean. >...

...‘foo’ in _Z3fooiiiiiii. That, and not having to print out the AST should make parsing the base name significantly faster on top of this. Do you have any other use case for the AST outside of base names? It still would be possible to export it from ItaniumDemangle. On 22 June 2017 at 02:03, Erik Pilkington via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On 6/21/17 5:42 PM, Rui Ueyama wrote: > > I'm very interested in your work because I've just started writing a > demangler for the Microsoft mangling scheme. What I found in the current > Itanium demangler is...

...hich might imply a slightly different representation. > It's unfortunate that my work is overlapping with yours. Looks like > you are ahead of me, so I'll take a look at your code to see if > there's something I can do for you. > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Erik Pilkington via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Hello all, > The itanium demangler in libcxxabi (and also, llvm/lib/Demangle) > is really slow. This is largely because the textual representation > of the symbo...

...e was a big performance win. Maybe the system demangler is fast enough nowadays, but if it isn't then we can't get rid of the FastDemangler. Jim > On Jun 22, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Pavel Labath via lldb-dev <lldb-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > On 22 June 2017 at 15:21, Erik Pilkington <erik.pilkington at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> On June 22, 2017 at 5:51:39 AM, Pavel Labath (labath at google.com) wrote: >> >> I don't have any concrete feedback, but: >> >> - +1 for removing the "FastDemagler" >> &...

Hi Fangqing, llvm::itaniumDemangle() doesn't yet provide this functionality, but I'm working on adding it in now for the LLDB folks (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2018-January/013186.html). I should have a patch up Very Soon! If you would like I can CC you to it. Thanks, Erik On 2018-03-16 2:15 PM, Fangqing Du via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi all, > > We know that

...erested or need more details? Please email kieran-dnw21tdAEJvZbNGZteT6vg@public.gmane.org<https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?view=cm&fs=1&tf=1&to=kieran-dnw21tdAEJvZbNGZteT6vg@public.gmane.org>and title the email “90 Seconds Developer Position” or something similar. Regards Kieran Pilkington Lead Developer - 90 Seconds -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rub...

Hi all, We know that 'ItaniumDemangle' has been added into llvm lib to resolve demangling related issues. And if we dump mangled function name '_Z3duti' into 'char *llvm::itaniumDemangle(const char *mangled_name, char *buf, size_t *n, int *status)', we will get 'dut(int)'. So my question is: How can I just get the function name 'dut' without parameters,

Hello all, I’m unsure of how the tests located in compiler-rt/test/builtins/Unit are run. They’re not attached to the cmake check-all target, as mentioned in compiler-rt/test/CMakeLists.txt:10, and they have no lit test suite associated with them. There is a shell script called “test” in test/builtins/Unit, but it hasn’t been touched since 2010, and make reference to no longer existing

Hello, For those interested in overcoming the problem with some NATs and Firewalls in regards to tftp. I found a nice little tftp server here: http://freshmeat.net/projects/jtftp/?topic_id=87 I tried it and it works great. Regards, Andres. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I'm currently running asterisk@home v 2.7. However I believe asterisk has inbuilt a system wide speed dial system. Preserved number range starting at 300. Just wondering if it's possible to view/backup/restore/modify this data without having to enter it in manually. e.g. 300 301 12345678 (to save phone number 12345678 in speed dial 301?) I'm looking at creating a new installation

Looking at installing Asterisk and have not been able to find any info on "minimum" or "recommend" system hardware. I have a box P200MMX 128mb 4.5gb HDD which is running Redhat 8.0 fine. Noticing on the Digium web site it mentions that the single fxo card (Wildcard X100P) requires a minimum pIII 500. Is my intended box going to be too slow? My application is a small level,

...only partially completed, and calls out to ItaniumDemangle.cpp in llvm (which is a copy of cxa_demangle.cpp) if it fails to parse the symbol. Any thoughts here would be appreciated! Thanks, Erik -------------- next part -------------- commit e526dffc812b303734fbce5644f2d2ae4c4ca3dc Author: Erik Pilkington <erik.pilkington at gmail.com> Date: Thu Jun 15 13:23:08 2017 -0700 demangle tree diff --git a/src/cxa_demangle.cpp b/src/cxa_demangle.cpp index a2c384e..495e62e 100644 --- a/src/cxa_demangle.cpp +++ b/src/cxa_demangle.cpp @@ -1,5070 +1,6381 @@ //===-------------------------- cxa_dem...

I have implemented playlist randomization into ezstream v0.1.2 for Linux. I am currently using a PII 266mhz for a server, so I wanted something that wouldn't have to reencode the audio as it is streamed and be able to play a playlist randomly. It uses STL Vectors to store each playlist and then randomly deletes the song from the list after it is played (this is to make sure the same