search for: pietrosanti

Quoting "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <lists at infosecurity.ch>: > Speex it's too cpu expensive for general S60 usage, it would require a > lot of ASM optimization. Did a quick search and saw ARM CPUs with speeds above 100 MHz. That should actually be enough for Speex, at least for narrowband. > If yo...

...without too much cpu issues on Nokia devices, i tried pjsip.org project on S60 FP1 E65 +200mhz ARM cpu with speex but don't had much luck in using it without having 100% cpu usage :( Please let us to know about your testing E65 CPU: http://www.nokia-tuning.net/index.php?s=processor Fabio Pietrosanti Jordan Dimov wrote: > Thank you, guys. > > Most smartphones in production today run at ~300MHz and above. So > this shouldn't be a problem. I'll try to compile speex for Symbian (I > see it's been ported, but the Symbian port is somewhat out of date?) > and I...

...\n 5113: time() = 1075892017 5113: time() = 1075892017 5113: time() = 1075892017 5113: fcntl(4, F_SETLKW64, 0xDFFFF510) = 0 5113: open64("/mailboxes/pietrosanti.it/lists at pietrosanti.it/.Cyber-Rights/cur/1075891040.P3168Q12514M511660.supertolla.itapac.net:2,S", O_RDONLY) = 14 5113: fstat64(14, 0xDFFFF550) = 0 5113: time() = 1075892017 5113: write(1, 0x00093488, 40)...

Is speex at this stage a good codec to use for real-time voice transmission over a direct CSD connection between two phones? Does anyone have any experience with using Speex on Nokia phones? If speex is not a good solution for this task, what would you recommend? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

...t the speex code it's still not mature enough for Mobile environment VoIP and audio streaming. Waiting for answers, being positive or negative. I think that this thread would clarify the idea to a lot of programmer willing to evaluate the codec choice for their products. Kind Regards Fabio Pietrosanti

...he cpus are much faster and the code complexity is much lower. my only regret is of not being able to write some demo apps for speex on win mob. I will surely deliver it in june to settle this debate. - farhan On 5/23/08, Jean-Marc Valin <jean-marc.valin at usherbrooke.ca> wrote: > Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) a ?crit : >> However, AMR it's not royalty free and if i need to use it on Windows >> Mobile i will need to pay a quite expensive royalty for each peace of >> software distributed (not sold, distributed!!!). > > This is exactly why I wrote Speex! > >> So,...

Hi all, supposing to have speex working at 3.95, when VAD/CNG is employed, which is the size of those "silence" samples respect to voice samples? I am wondering if it could be possible to lower even the transmission of VAD/CNG samples by specifying "outbound" in the communication channel only 1 bit instead of sending the whole VAD/CNG packet. I am doing the same for AMR

Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) a ?crit : > However, AMR it's not royalty free and if i need to use it on Windows > Mobile i will need to pay a quite expensive royalty for each peace of > software distributed (not sold, distributed!!!). This is exactly why I wrote Speex! > So, i am evaluating other code...

On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <lists at infosecurity.ch> wrote: > > I got the feedback that Speex require too much computation power to run > on Symbian OS and Windows Mobile devices doing encoding/decoding in > realtime with all the Narrowband-enabled features. > > I crawled the mailing list arch...

you can use the marker bit on the RTP. - farhan On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) <lists at infosecurity.ch> wrote: > Hi all, > > supposing to have speex working at 3.95, when VAD/CNG is employed, which > is the size of those "silence" samples respect to voice samples? > > I am wondering if it could be possible to lower even the transmiss...

hello all, At my workplace, our colleague Mukesh has just completed a port of speex 1.2.1 to Palm OS. He had to write a couple of mathlib functions, but the trunk remains unchanged. It works quite well, I was wondering if there will be any interest in this port in the distribution. - farhan

...compile speex for Symbian (I see it's been ported, but the Symbian port is somewhat out of date?) and I'll run it on a pair of Nokia N76 phones. I'll let you know how it works out. If someone has any further advice in this direction, I would deeply appreciate it. Quoting "Fabio Pietrosanti (naif)" <lists at infosecurity.ch>: > > > If you are using CSD, like for a secure telephony solution > > (http://m.privategsm.com), consider that speex is VBR and VBR codecs are > > not recommended for security reasons ( > http://zfoneproject.com/faq.html#vbr) ....

...rticle-ssl-and-tls-renegotiation-vulnerability-discovered.html www.phonefactor.com/sslgapdocs/Renegotiating_TLS.pdf Does the Asterisk 1.6/1.8 SIP/TLS implementation suffer from the TLS Renegotiation vulnerability or the TLS-renegotiation it's disabled by default, in how OpenSSL is used? Fabio Pietrosanti

...oot@b50srv1:/usr/local/src# cp -p rsync-2.5.6/rsync bin/ root@b50srv1:/usr/local/src# tar cvf rsync-2.5.6-AIX433.tar man bin root@b50srv1:/usr/local/src# gzip -9 rsync-2.5.6-AIX433.tar If someone would like to update the binary version available it's possible to download that on http://fabio.pietrosanti.it/rsync-2.5.6-AIX433.tar.gz . Ciao -naif

...ion. We can leaverage community oriented website of Symbian development and Windows development in order to have a lot of people testing the sample application on different devices and uploading their log files. What do you think about this approach? (it's just an idea eh...) Regards, Fabio Pietrosanti Ashhar Farhan wrote: > hi all, > I can claim that our hotfoon service has run millions of mobile voip > minutes using speex on mobile and desktops. it works! > earlier you needed more powerful cpus (until the integer port), > however now the cpus are much faster and the code complex...

Fabio Pietrosanti (naif) wrote: > i am not criticizing the technology itself, but the fact that from the > point of view of the implementator that need to make a technological > choice while selecting a codec to be used for a mobile multimedia > application, speex does not provide affordable informati...

Hi, related to my previous email i found that setting "mail_save_crlf = no" instead of yes make dovecot working. However if enabled on solaris 8 it doesn't work hanging on sendfilev64() call. I noticed that maildir file names are still different from maildrop and dovecot but now works. However moving bigger mailbox from local storage to remote imap server i receive