search for: piechotka

I''ve always think that it belongs to controller but I''ve read few articles that it should be done by model and controller should be thin glue betwean model and view. Where should I put it? Regards -- I''ve probably left my head... somewhere. Please wait untill I find it. Homepage (pl_PL): http://uzytkownik.jogger.pl/ (GNU/)Linux User: #425935 (see

I''ve noticed that: - with x86-64 Fedora 15 DVD install images: - du -sh <ROOT VOLUME> was 36 GB - btrfs df | grep -i data have shown over 40 GB used - without - du -sh <ROOT VOLUME> is 34 GB - btrfs df | grep -i data have shown less then 34 GB used It seems that iso files are considered compressable while they may not be (and penalty is severe - 3x). Regards

Hi, I'm trying to write custom pass. However opt started crashed in opt.cpp. After debugging it looks like PassInf->NormalCtor points to unmapped memory (rest of struct contains correct data about my pass) - it pointed high in user memory (0x756e672e006e6f69). It happens only when I tried to install debug version of llvm system-wide (I've check that it wasn't caused by stale .a

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1136 Bug ID: 1136 Summary: nft dump and -f are not perfect inverses Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at netfilter.org

http://llvm.org/docs/CodeGenerator.html#machine-code-description-classes Section starting: Fixed (preassigned) registers It talks about converting: define i32 @test(i32 %X, i32 %Y) { %Z = udiv i32 %X, %Y ret i32 %Z } into ;; X is in EAX, Y is in ECX mov %EAX, %EDX sar %EDX, 31 idiv %ECX ret BUT, where does the "sar" come from? Kind Regards James

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197 Bug ID: 1197 Summary: 255.255.255.255 is transformed into 255.255.255.255-255.255.255.255 Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft

When I issue command 'net ads keytab add HTTP' I got a message 'Processing principals to add...' but nothing else happens - no change in keytab, net ads keytab list output, no errors in log etc. [Global] netbios name = HOSTNAME workgroup = DOMAIN realm = DOMAIN server string = %h Gentoo DT security = ads auth methods = sam winbind encrypt passwords = yes kerberos

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1125 Bug ID: 1125 Summary: Setting bit mark according to result of lookup Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Gentoo Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: nft Assignee: pablo at

...) > > And this is a must have in you smb.conf > > # renew the kerberos ticket > winbind refresh tickets = yes > > > > > Greetz, > > Louis > >> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >> Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Maciej Piechotka >> via samba >> Verzonden: donderdag 19 januari 2017 21:14 >> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >> Onderwerp: [Samba] net ads keytab add has no visible effects >> >> When I issue command 'net ads keytab add HTTP' I got a message >> 'Processing prin...

Hi list, I don''t trust theoretical benchmarks that much and prefer "real-life benchs" on the occasion, so here''s mine: Given 4 laptops, the most powerful of which was running BTRFS and the others ext3 or ext4, all machines running Ubuntu 11.04 Natty 32-bit with a stock Ubuntu 2.6.38-11 kernel, all machines were given the following FS-intensive task : - Upgrade

Hi, I have interpreted sentence "This option may slow down your system at first run." as "it might slow down after first time you boot". However it seems to take long time once every tenth boot or so. Is it error in documentation or bug in btrfs? Best regards -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to