search for: piecemal

Subject: Re: Is it possible to transfer a large, dynamic file in a piecemeal fashion? Yes it is. Don Kuenz via rsync <rsync at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Greetings, > > Is it possible to use rsync to transmit a large, dynamic 2TB file in a > piecemeal fashion during daylight hours over the course of a dozen days? > On a good day, about 200GB of data can be transferred before

You probably want --inplace for this rather than partial. The upside of --partial is that the existing file isn't replaced until there is a complete file to replace it with. The downside is building up that entire new file. On 09/05/2017 12:01 AM, Don Kuenz via rsync wrote: > Subject: Re: Is it possible to transfer a large, dynamic file in a piecemeal fashion? Yes it is. > > Don

Greetings, Is it possible to use rsync to transmit a large, dynamic 2TB file in a piecemeal fashion during daylight hours over the course of a dozen days? On a good day, about 200GB of data can be transferred before rsync times out to enable a nightly local backup to complete. The local backup changes a few 512 byte blocks in the 2TB file. That's why the 2TB file is dynamic. As an

On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 10:45:26PM +0000, Don Kuenz via rsync wrote: > Greetings, > > Is it possible to use rsync to transmit a large, dynamic 2TB file in a > piecemeal fashion during daylight hours over the course of a dozen days? > On a good day, about 200GB of data can be transferred before rsync times > out to enable a nightly local backup to complete. The local backup

From: Feizhou > I know what a Kerberos authentication system is. > You mean a core component in Samba 3.0's functionality as an ADS client. You're still artificially limiting your understanding. Kerberos (with the MS extensions in the case of 200x/XP) is how objects authenticate each other and grant tickets for access in a Kerberos realm. Samba can use Kerberos how it sees fit.

From: Dag Wieers > Bryan, and you're still belittling people in discussions and get into long > arguments as a result. Pretty please stop doing that. I apologize for any belittling. It is not my intent, but I do see a repeat theme. People thing in single products/projects, not breaking down things into their multiple technologies. That's all I meant by "artificially

This is a real newbie question. What makes it worse is that I know I've seen the answer somewhere, but I can no longer find it. If I have a loop that is supposed to generate a vector piecemeal, adding an element each time through the loop, what do I do to stop it failing the first time around the loop, when the vector doesn't yet exist (so I can't use the append() function)?

Subsequent to trying to "yum update"-- it failed--, I tried to resolve the dependencies piecemeal: # yum update faad2 .... --> Processing Dependency: libfaad.so.0 for package: ffmpeg ---> Package faad2.i386 0:2.7-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution ffmpeg-0.5-2.el5.rf.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libfaad.so.0

Hello, I started some refactoring work on tools/opt/opt.cpp in r201116, but conceptually this is part of a larger effort. I'd like to consult with llvmdev@ about the best way to move this forward. Background: opt is a very useful swiss-army-knife tool, and its capabilities may be useful to custom tools. However, as it stands now opt is now very modular - almost all its functionality is

Hi Apelete, Thanks for trying to help cleanup the LLVM codebase of Clang Static Analyzer warnings. But it seems a lot of the fixes that are being proposed are somewhat mechanical and may be doing the wrong thing in a few ways. * Initializing variables that are only used when initialized through some existing codepath - this can make tools like Memory Sanitizer less useful, because now the value

On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 19:10, Chris Lattner wrote: > Yes, definitely. I think the right way to do this is to make it be as > incremental as possible. In particular, the biggest benefit will be to > get llvm/test/Programs into a seperate tarball from the main LLVM tree, as > it is big and will (hopefully!) keep getting bigger. There are several > tasks that can be done

Interesting that you should cite Stallman because freedom is an issue here, we've been reduced to Microsoft when it comes to init. We've lost most of our flexibility with no option to choose piecemeal what we want and don't want. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrew Holway" <andrew.holway at gmail.com> To: "centos" <centos at centos.org> Sent:

Commit d02d9c9d used pthread_mutex to avoid interleaving output. However, the standard provides flockfile() for grouping related FILE* I/O that must not be interleaved; and that may be lighter-weight than rolling our own locking. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com> --- Pushing this one; as a related conversation on another mailing list reminded me about flockfile().

Hi. I need more space on my domU server, so i create a file image to attach it to the domU. But when i load that image in the domU, show a size very different to the create. I create the file with this command dd if=/dev/zero of=/xen/domains/SRV03/opt-disk.img bs=1024k seek=30720 count=30720 (The idea is create an image disk with 30GB, but when i check the disk on the domU show 64GB.)

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 4:34 PM, Matthew Miller <mattdm at mattdm.org> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:04:41PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote: >> Interesting, but it seems to _only_ show groups that weren't included >> in the anaconda install. For example where the saved anaconda-ks-cfg >> shows @gnome-desktop and @development, 'yum grouplist' only shows

Hello All First - a warning. I'm not very R or programming savvy. I am trying to do something without much luck, and have scoured help-pages, but nothing has come up. Here it is: I have a matrix (m) of approx 40,000 rows and 3 columns, filled with numbers. I would like to convert the contents of this matrix into another matrix (m_p), where the numbers of (m) have been coerced into a

Rather than including llvm header files piecemeal on an ongoing basis, I'm looking for a way to include all such header files once and for all. To that end, I wrote a Python script to generate include directives for all .h files in llvm/include and its subdirectories. This almost works, but getting two error messages: In file included from src\main.cpp:1: In file included from

Is the phrase "index <- match(x, sort(unique(x)))" reliable, in the sense that it will never return NA? Context: Calculation of survival curves involves the concept of unique death times. I've had reported cases in the past where survfit failed, and it was due to the fact that two "differ by machine precision" values would sometimes match and sometimes not,

On Tue, 13 Apr 2004, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 19:10, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > Yes, definitely. I think the right way to do this is to make it be as > > incremental as possible. In particular, the biggest benefit will be to > > get llvm/test/Programs into a seperate tarball from the main LLVM tree, as > > it is big and will (hopefully!) keep

Dear List, I downloaded R for the first time yesterday, in the hopes that I might deal more effectively with a complex repeated measures experimental design involving inbred strains of laboratory mice. The design below, somewhat simplified, cannot be computed with standard ANOVA, because something called the X'X matrix is too large. The design has the following factors: Between-subject