search for: physcial

Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate than a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it common to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and how much virtual hardware to give each VM. I'm wondering about virtual nics and if there may be a problems have multiple vm's accessing the network through a single physcial...

Hi, I am in the middle of migrating a server from Apple's leopard to snow leopard. Having big problems with migrating mail to dovecot. The version is: # dovecotd --version 1.1.17apple0.5 and I use the migration script provide by Apple, /usr/libexec/dovecot/migrate_mail_data.pl The current problems concern migrating imap accounts. The old data typically shows up to mail clients as

..., 2015 at 7:09 PM, Andrey Repin <anrdaemon at yandex.ru> wrote: > Greetings, David Bear! > > > Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate > > than a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it > > common to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? > > You don't need VM's. > > > If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and > > how much virtual hardware to give each VM. > > None. Seriously, you're overcomplicating things. > > > I...

Am 12.05.2015 um 21:50 schrieb David Bear: > Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate > than a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it > common to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? > > If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and > how much virtual hardware to give each VM. I'm wondering about virtual > nics and if there may be a problems have multiple vm's accessing the > network throu...

2015-05-12 21:50 GMT+02:00 David Bear <dwbear75 at gmail.com>: > Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate than > a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it common > to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? > > If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and > how much virtual hardware to give each VM. I'm wondering about virtual nics > and if there may be a problems have multiple vm's accessing the network > throu...

Greetings, Mike! >>> Understanding that a samba 4.x ADDC should be run on a an os separate >>> than a samba 4. file server, I was thinking of virtualizing both. Is it >>> common to have a single physcial server with two VM's running samba? >> >> You don't need VM's. >> >>> If some is there a recommendation on how much hardware to start with and >>> how much virtual hardware to give each VM. >> >> None. Seriously, you're overcom...

Hi List, I get the following error when trying to create a new vm. There is 1024MB total physcial memory on the machine with 320MB used. Error: I need 1045876KiB, but dom0_min_mem is 1048576 and shrinking to 1048576 KiB would leave only 1021888 KiB free. Thanks in advance M _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xenso...

..., do a "dd" across the raw disk and grep it for log fragments. I have seen vital erased logs recovered this way before! </quote> I shall try and explain a bit more! If an attacker erases, or truncates a log, the information in it is lost to the filesystem, but might well still be physcially on the disk, particularly if the filesystem /var/log is on, isn''t too busy. So if you act quickly, and /var/log filesystem is quiet, some blocks that still contain old valuable log info, might still be on the disk. If /var/log is part of (eg.) /dev/hda1, then yuou might try dd if=/dev...

...kfront_info *info) { unsigned long long sectors; unsigned long sector_size; + unsigned int physical_sector_size; unsigned int binfo; int err; int barrier, flush, discard, persistent; @@ -1437,6 +1441,17 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info) return; } + /* + * physcial-sector-size is a newer field, so old backends may not + * provide this. Assume physical sector size to be the same as + * sector_size in that case. + */ + err = xenbus_gather(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend, + "physical-sector-size", "%u", &physical_sector_size...

Hi! I''m trying to create a routed VPN using OpenVPN - and having trouble with the routing concepts involved. Let me see if I can properly describe my current topology: Server - LAN, with both local workstations and remote bridged workstations on the 192.168.0.0/24 network (this works without reservation). Server located at 192.168.0.71, 192.168.0.72, 192.168.0.222, and few

While researching another issue unrelated to Syslinux, I found some mildly disturbing news that affects Syslinux. As HPA stated back on 2009-06-04, hard drive manufacturers are pushing towards a 4096B (4kiB; 4k) native sector size. They're calling it "Advanced Format Technology". It appears that WD (Western Digital; WDC) is the first with some products being released back in

Hi All, For quite some time I've used raid 1 as a means of providing a rollback mechanism for an upgrade (which I learned from others long ago). So essentially, before an upgrade you split the mirrors and upgrade one side or the other. If your upgrade goes well you sync one way, if your upgrade does not you sync the other (much hand waving and chanting going on, as its more complicated than

...6'',''r'') ] > > might be an appropriate entry as I have one IDE disk (hda) with root-fs > on /dev/hda1 > ? I don''t know enough about your setup to know what you should have, but this is almost certainly wrong: you''re trying to make real physcial partition hda1 visible to the domain as both sda1 and sda6. Are you trying to have a a separate writeable root and read-only /usr partion? You do realise that the writeable partition must not be the same partition that you''re using for domain0''s root? You need to make a co...

...he interference graph, it is possible to perform register allocation in a single pass. The key is in not modifying the graph. If one has frequency for each basic block, then one can sort basic blocks by frequency, allocating the highest frequency blocks first, and where possible assigning the same physcial register to all virtual registers in each phi node (to avoid copies). At program points where the live set is larger than k, the set of physical registers, one spills the the register that has the largest distance between its next use. At least that is how I am thinking about this problem. I am als...

...id),] # except: # vfr_ipaddr = [xenctl.utils.add_offset_to_ip(xenctl.get_current_ipaddr(),vmid), # xenctl.utils.add_offset_to_ip(''169.254.1.0'',vmid),] #vfr_ipaddr = ["10.56.11.30"]; vfr_ipaddr = ["10.0.0.246"] # xen-vm0 # STEP 5a. Identify any physcial partitions or virtual disks you want the # domain to have access to, and what you want them accessible as # e.g. vbd_list = [ (''phy:sda6'',''sda6'', ''w''), # (''phy:sda%d'' % (3+vmid), ''hda2'', ''r'...

...ow_bug.cgi?id=1125 2) local live migration not work http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1126 Old issues : ============================================== 1) Fail to boot smp Linux with VT-d NIC assigned on IA32e platform This issue only happened on special circumstance. Such as physcial mem=1G and try to assign both dom0 and guest memory equals to 512M. 2) [Installation] Can not install 32bit Fedora 7 with vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1084 3) [Installation] Fedora8 IA32e guest installation failure. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/s...

Hi all, This is today''s nightly report. There isn''t any new issue. Old issues : ============================================== 1) Fail to boot smp Linux with VT-d NIC assigned on IA32e platform This issue only happened on special circumstance. Such as physcial mem=1G and try to assign both dom0 and guest memory equals to 512M. 2) [Installation] Can not install 32bit Fedora 7 with vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1084 3) [Installation] Fedora8 IA32e guest installation failure. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/s...

Hi All, This is latest xen unstable tree nightly testing report. We didn''t find any regression. Old issues : ============================================== 1) Fail to boot smp Linux with VT-d NIC assigned on IA32e platform This issue only happened on special circumstance. Such as physcial mem=1G and try to assign both dom0 and guest memory equals to 512M. 2) [Installation] Can not install 32bit Fedora 7 with vcpu > 1 http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1084 3) [Installation] Fedora8 IA32e guest installation failure. http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/s...

...or the interfaces other than TEQL0 (ex ETH0,ETH1, ETH3) seemed to lessen how many of these messages were actually shown and how badly the performance originally was. I can''t seem to figure out why it wants to route through any other device than TEQL0 however, with those extra lines for the physcial interfaces or without. $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $EXTIF -j MASQUERADE $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $EXTIF2 -j MASQUERADE $IPTABLES -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o $EXTIF3 -j MASQUERADE  Anyone have any clue what to do? _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing li...

Maybe this question is a little stupid, but please help me. I am a newbie to Xen. When I tried to create a new domain "domain 1", I followed the Yan-Ching CHU''s guide on :installing quick file systems for new domains in Xen 1.2". But when I do "xc_dom_create.py -Dvmid=1", Xen seems to start to boot with some normal bootup information, but right after several