search for: phyla

hi, I can''t seem to be able to delivery stories! I have this in my controller MyPublisher.deliver_story(@current_facebook_user.friends.first, @current_facebook_user, @object.id) This is in models/my_publisher.rb # story is published to the story of the to user def story(to, f, object_id) send_as :story recipients to title "An object?" body

...ging from 0% to the highest relative abundance that I observe in the above table (65.1%). The default scale I get using the link above is just a relative intensity scale ranging from 1 to 5 (where white represent low percentages and steelblue represented high percentages). This is alright but for phyla that are present at relative abundance of less than 5% all appear to be white (or non-existant). Is there anyway to fix this? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, Chris

Hi, I don''t know how most of you get these messages, but I get the digest version. It seems that most people, when replying to a message, include all the previous messages in their reply. This means that when I read the digest version, I need to scroll through several pages of old emails to find the new ones. It doesn''t make sense (to me) to be resend these old messages over and

Hi: Are there any commercial Rails based CMS? I searched but I have not found any. Any pointer? Cheers Rob --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this

I submitted this as a bug here: http://rubyforge.org/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=18799&group_id=4187&atid=16130 However, I just realized that I probably should have posted here first. Has anyone else had a similar experiance with queries that don''t return results? I have the following FQL Query: "SELECT uid FROM user WHERE has_added_app = 1 AND uid IN (SELECT

Hi, I was first attracted to ZFS (and therefore OpenSolaris) because I thought that ZFS allowed the used of different sized disks in raidz pools without wasted disk space. Further research has confirmed that this isn''t possible--by default. I have seen a little bit of documentation around using ZFS with slices. I think this might be the answer, but I would like to be sure what the