search for: phreaknet

On 4/20/2023 7:16 AM, Rhys Hanrahan wrote: > > Hi All, > > I’m having issues figuring out how to set no DTMF timeout on the AGI > GET DATA command as “0” still has a multi-second timeout if no input > is given. I am trying to find the source code of the AGI command to > figure it out, but I can’t for the life of me find the underlying > source code. The closest I’ve

On 7/23/2023 12:32 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: >> On 22 Jul 2023, at 23:40, asterisk at phreaknet.org wrote: >> >> I'm assuming you mean at the device level, and that you want to send >> only the relevant header to each device? >> Use pre-dial handlers; a unique handler runs on each destination >> channel. With PJSIP, you're forced to do this anyways, but...

Anthony, No, I had no intention of doing any of those things, for I know not what they are or why I would need or want to be doing them. Maybe I should have just stuck with the original idea of installing from Debian distro. I'm exploring the phreaknet option now. If I come up with a running system, I'm just going to leave it that way and work with it as it is. On 4/6/2023 10:35 AM, Antony Stone wrote: > On Thursday 06 April 2023 at 15:48:24, Steve Matzura wrote: > >> this is the first time I have attempted a >> from-scra...

I have found that I can add the restart of asterisk (killall -9 asterisk) to the h extension- BOY is that UGLY. chan_console is not a testing device - how can we get this nasty bug fixed ? Jerry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20230913/e148eada/attachment.html>

>An issue[1] was already created by asterisk at phreaknet.org and they also put >a fix up for review and inclusion[2]. >[1] https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/issues/308 >[2] https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/pull/309 The change "seems" to be working. Will test more tomorrow - had to leave. THANKS! Jerry -------------- next par...

On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 5:20 PM Jerry Geis <jerry.geis at gmail.com> wrote: > >An issue[1] was already created by asterisk at phreaknet.org and they > also put > >a fix up for review and inclusion[2]. > > >[1] https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/issues/308 > >[2] https://github.com/asterisk/asterisk/pull/309 > > > The change "seems" to be working. > Will test more tomorrow - had to lea...

It appears I have bigger problems heretofore unknown. I've gone through this several times today since I last wrote, and the phreaknet-run build failed every time, but each time at a different point. The failure manifestation was always the same--during either a compile or link of some module, a different one each time, my entire system turned itself off, which to me means there is either a memory fault which is causing the w...

On 5/27/2023 3:37 PM, Steve Matzura wrote: > On 5/27/2023 11:40 AM, asterisk at phreaknet.org wrote: > >> Relative paths are relative to your language-specific directory. >> > Ya know, that's the one thing I didn't do was test Playback before > copying the sound files out of /usr/share/asterisk/sounds/en_us into > /var/lib/asterisk/sounds--I don't e...

> On 22 Jul 2023, at 23:40, asterisk at phreaknet.org wrote: > > On 7/22/2023 4:51 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: >> We have a couple of parallel ring settings (and this has worked well for eons). >> >> Either in the form of >> >> same => n,Dial(SIP/1001 & SIP/1002 & SIP/1003 …..) >> >...

On 5/27/2023 11:40 AM, asterisk at phreaknet.org wrote: > Relative paths are relative to your language-specific directory. > Ya know, that's the one thing I didn't do was test Playback before copying the sound files out of /usr/share/asterisk/sounds/en_us into /var/lib/asterisk/sounds--I don't even know for sure that hell...

> On Jan 2, 2024, at 23:17, thelma at sys-concept.com wrote: > > On 1/2/24 15:13, asterisk at phreaknet.org wrote: >>> On 1/2/2024 4:03 PM, thelma at sys-concept.com wrote: >>> I'm using asterisk-16.30.1 >>> >>> When I try to call another asterisk server over IAX I get a busy signal, >>> >>> chan_iax2.c:4739 __auto_congest: Auto-congesting c...

On 5/28/2023 6:19 AM, asterisk at phreaknet.org wrote: > >> >>> A great reason to avoid Asterisk packages and compile from source >>> instead. You'll save yourself a lot of headaches. >> >> That's how I started, by trying to build version 18 from source. It >> failed. Colossally. The com...

On Thursday 06 April 2023 at 15:48:24, Steve Matzura wrote: > this is the first time I have attempted a > from-scratch installation and setup on my own. ...<so far, so good>... > Then the weeds started to appear, and I was off into them. > > The first was the mention of Alembic. > Reading on, I found this, regarding an SQL database: > SQL? Database? Where ... what

...Matzura wrote: > Anthony, > > > No, I had no intention of doing any of those things, for I know not > what they are or why I would need or want to be doing them. Maybe I > should have just stuck with the original idea of installing from > Debian distro. I'm exploring the phreaknet option now. If I come up > with a running system, I'm just going to leave it that way and work > with it as it is. > > > On 4/6/2023 10:35 AM, Antony Stone wrote: >> On Thursday 06 April 2023 at 15:48:24, Steve Matzura wrote: >> >>> this is the first time I...

On Thursday 06 April 2023 at 18:29:43, Jeff LaCoursiere wrote: > If you just want something easy to use out of the box, install the > FreePBX distro. Given that Steve originally said "I've been using Asterisk, including administering and maintaining it, in some aspect since 2003, but this is the first time I have attempted a from-scratch installation and setup on my own." I

On 1/2/2024 4:03 PM, thelma at sys-concept.com wrote: > I'm using asterisk-16.30.1 > > When I try to call another asterisk server over IAX I get a busy signal, > > chan_iax2.c:4739 __auto_congest: Auto-congesting call due to slow > response >     -- IAX2/192.168.143.1:4569-656 is circuit-busy > > Asterisk-16.16 is working normally, no congestion error. There is not

..._pjsip so that I don't have to do that. It's so surprising that the issue so seemingly obvious and trivial hasn't been addressed yet that I wanted to query the collective wisdom of this list to verify my observations. Thanks for github pointer. Michael On 7/5/23 16:46, asterisk at phreaknet.org wrote: > On 7/5/2023 4:19 PM, Michael Ulitskiy wrote: >> >> Hi Michael, >> >> Thanks for the reply. >> >> I was referring to the scenario you named as 'outbound broken'. I >> didn't get to look at inbound call behavior yet, as I got stuc...

On 7/8/2023 5:32 PM, Federico wrote: > > I am using Asterisk 16.30 inside Freepbx, with commercial modules, > purchased from Sangoma and Symphony. After a few hours my memory usage > reaches 900 GB, no kidding, in a box with 1 TB of RAM.  The question > is: how can I determine what is causing the memory leak? Can somebody > send me instructions to find out what module is

On 7/22/2023 4:51 PM, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > We have a couple of parallel ring settings (and this has worked well for eons). > > Either in the form of > > same => n,Dial(SIP/1001 & SIP/1002 & SIP/1003 …..) > > Or via a subroutine (below) that has a bit of extra logic: > > FOO = 1010 & 1019 & 1017 & 1033 > ... > same =>

On 9/8/2023 8:18 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > But when I do a second test. Asterisk HANGS on ChanIsAvail() > > Then I thought lets SKIP that - and just let it do the Dial() - I > stopped everything - got it running again. - and then the Dial() hangs > on the second call. > > So both ChanIsAvail() or Dial() both hang on the second call in. > > So only 1 call in will work.