search for: phpmailer

...lt;gary at ringways.co.uk> From: Caylian Curtis <caylian at enjoylovef**k.com> Reply-To: caylian at enjoylovef**k.com Subject: Re: Re: [CentOS] please block user Message-ID: <0000014f6ef4427c-8079d442-fc1e-4116-841a-ba157163def8-000000 at email.amazonses.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.10 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer/) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="b1_51d7d61107a8c78e364939b05ceed99b" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-SES-Outgoing: 2015.08.27-54.240.8.81 Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.dCINwTXKWoGdJVCeRWe4yCPvzru4XXSdsNzu7qb...

On Wednesday 26 August 2015 20:11:20 g wrote: > so the only harm is spam, which i now have going to my Junk folder. > That is not the only harm. These people are very good and very effective confidence tricksters and are experts at getting vulnerable people to send them money which they usually cannot affort to lose in the first place.

Say we have 20k-50k users signed up for an email newsletter. Does anyone have any data on how well ActionMailer does with mass emails? How long would that take to send? Anything I should watch out for? Thanks, Joe

Hi, Is FAXing with Asterisk a practical option ? Or is it better just to use a plain fax connected to an FXS and just switch with Asterisk. I specifically wanted to know if there was any experience using just the fax scanner to send faxes and receive them via asterisk and the to e-mail. My idea was to take my old fax connect it to an FXS port and send faxes with the fax machine (using the fax

Hi! I would like to invite you to visit my Refriendz page and see my latest photos. In order to visit my space, you must go to: http://www.refriendz.com/?do=Login.Invite&rid=rtskarthik&email=asterisk-users at lists.digium.com (If this link does not work, please copy and paste it into your browser or go to www.refriendz.com and enter 'rtskarthik' as Invitation ID to Login to the

...rt-0.8.0-1.el6.noarch php-ldap-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 php-mbstring-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 php-mcrypt-5.3.3-1.el6.x86_64 phpMyAdmin-3.5.7-1.el6.noarch php-mysql-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 php-pdo-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 php-pear-1.9.4-4.el6.noarch php-pgsql-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 php-php-gettext-1.0.11-3.el6.noarch php-PHPMailer-5.2.2-1.el6.noarch php-process-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 php-simplepie-1.3.1-3.el6.noarch php-xml-5.3.3-22.el6.x86_64 Diffing php -m results: sdiff -s phpM-CentOS6.txt phpM-CentOS5.txt Core < dom | dbase enchant < ereg < fileinfo <...

Hello! I've setup dovecot a few months ago, and it was working pretty swimmingly. Then, out of nowhere, we started getting this error: Apr 21 19:15:17 IMAP(xx at xxx.com): Fatal: block_alloc(1073741824): Out of memory Apr 21 19:15:17 IMAP(xx at xxx.com): Error: Raw backtrace: imap [0x49e5e0] -> imap [0x49e643] -> imap [0x49dba1] -> imap [0x4a7f6d] -> imap [0x4a7f98] -> imap

Greetings, A malfunctioning disk this past week accelerated a lingering decision to move to CentOS 6.x from CentOS 5.x. Most of our content is functioning and being presented as it should be. However, there appear to be php-related issues. Basic squirrelmail (a php-dependent package) works correctly. However, drupal, and other php-dependent parts that call postgresql and mysql databases of

Hi, I've run into a bit of a problem and exhausted my knowledge and research. I'm hoping that I've overlooked something very obvious! I moved from a single Apple OS X 10.6.2 server Dovecot environment to a NFS clustered environment, currently with two servers. Both servers are identical hardware, software. Currently both the Dovecot index and data files are on the NFS RAID array.

...gnoring request to alter tags of bug #110073 to the same tags previously set Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #267051 to the same tags previously set Ignoring request to alter tags of bug #307674 to the same tags previously set > tags 429339 + jessie Bug #429339 [moodle] Needs to use libphp-phpmailer Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 616812 + jessie Bug #616812 [src:foomatic-gui] foomatic-gui: deprecation of dh_pycentral, please use dh_python2 Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 701248 + jessie Bug #701248 [src:blktap] blktap: ftbfs with GCC-4.8 Added tag(s) jessie. > tags 205456 + jessie Bug #20545...