search for: phinod

...hey were using . instead of -> in 1 place), and after fixing this bug I've got the kernel to compile... ...But after that, LLVM started to crash during translation of IR into shader code with R600 backend. I've done some investigation and figured out that the crash is caused by a PHINode containing itself. SIAnnotateControlFlow::handleLoopCondition() can't handle such situation - it recurses into itself, calls Phi->eraseFromParent() inside the inner execution, returns into outer one, gets zeroed out object and crashes when trying to do something with its members......

On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 03:01:01PM -0500, Anshu Dasgupta wrote: > ><snip> > >for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Dest->begin(); PHINode *PN = > >dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); ++I) > > visitPHINode(*PN); > ><snip> > > > >build_vc71\lib\Transforms\Scalar\SCCP.cpp(202) : error C2275: > >'llvm::PHINode' : illegal use of this type as an expression > > > >but I think is a...

...foA[RegInfo->getNumRegs()]; C99 array llvm/lib/Target/TargetSchedInfo.cpp, # int classPairGaps[numSchedClasses][numSchedClasses]; C99 array The next bigger problem is that the compiler complains about this kind of construct... <snip> for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Dest->begin(); PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); ++I) visitPHINode(*PN); <snip> build_vc71\lib\Transforms\Scalar\SCCP.cpp(202) : error C2275: 'llvm::PHINode' : illegal use of this type as an expression in short, is the assignment in the PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I) ,as if I br...

Hi all, I wrote code that compiled with llvm 2.8, but now I'm using llvm 2.9 and it doesn't compile anymore: My code looks like this: User *U; ... if (PHINode * phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(U)) { ... BasicBlock * Pred = phi->getIncomingBlock(I); ... } And when I compile it with clang: Live.cc:130:27: error: member access into incomplete type 'llvm::PHINode' BasicBlock * Pred...

I can confirm that both are compiled properly: A) PHINode *PN; for (BasicBlock::iterator I = H->begin(); PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); I++) .... B) for (BasicBlock::iterator I = H->begin; isa<PHINode>(I); I++) { PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode(I); .... } I'll make a patch for whatever solution do you prefer (this probl...

Hi Paolo, > <snip> > for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Dest->begin(); PHINode *PN = > dyn_cast<PHINode>(I); ++I) > visitPHINode(*PN); > <snip> > > build_vc71\lib\Transforms\Scalar\SCCP.cpp(202) : error C2275: > 'llvm::PHINode' : illegal use of this type as an expression > > but I think is a NO-NO, so suggestions? Since it...

On Fri, 3 Sep 2004, Paolo Invernizzi wrote: > I can confirm that both are compiled properly: Ok. > for (BasicBlock::iterator I = H->begin; isa<PHINode>(I); I++) { > PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode(I); > .... > } > > I'll make a patch for whatever solution do you prefer (this problem is > a showstopper for more than a dozen files...) I prefer this option (it reduces the scope of the PN variable). -Chris > &g...

I guess I didn't have a clear question. Suppose we have BB1 and BB2 both point to BB3. BB1 has variable x. BB2 also as variable x. BB3 will have PHINode for x with 2 value from BB1 and BB2. BB1 BB2 \ / BB3 Now if BB1 and BB2 is extracted into a function (using ExtractCodeRegion), they will be replaced by a basic block called codeRepl (which has a call to the extracted function). codeRepl | BB3 The problem is that the PHI...

...tmp.15 = load %struct.MYSQL_ROWS** %3, align 4 ... bb1: ... %tmp.1 = load %struct.MYSQL_ROWS** %6, align 4 ... bb4: ; preds = %bb1, %bb, %entry %tmp.0 = phi %struct.MYSQL_ROWS* [ null, %entry ], [ %tmp.15, %bb ], [ %tmp.1, %bb1 ] %tmp.0 is the PHINode whose value is from entry, bb and bb1. After extracting bb and bb1 into new function, the program becomes codeRepl: ; preds = %entry call void @mysql_data_seek_bb(%struct.MYSQL_DATA* %1, i64 %row, %struct.MYSQL_ROWS** %tmp.15.loc, %struct.MYSQL_ROWS** %tm...

I am getting a segmentation fault as soon as I touch the Basic block *b value defined as :  std::string getPHIAssigns(const PHINode *PH)  { const BasicBlock *b = PH->getParent();    errs() << b->size(); where as getPHIAssigns is being called from               for (BasicBlock::iterator ins=b->begin(), e3=b->end(); ins!=e3; ++ins, ++l) // get instructions                 { if (const PHINode *PH = dyn_c...

...est that (1) you build LLVM with assertions enabled, (2) you run the verifier on your bitcode, and (3) run your program under valgrind. Ciao, Duncan. > I am getting a segmentation fault as soon as I touch the Basic block > *b value defined as : > > std::string getPHIAssigns(const PHINode *PH) > { const BasicBlock *b = PH->getParent(); > errs()<< b->size(); > > > where as getPHIAssigns is being called from > > for (BasicBlock::iterator ins=b->begin(), e3=b->end(); > ins!=e3; ++ins, ++l) // get instructions >...

On 01/26/2011 07:50 PM, Vu Le wrote: > I guess I didn't have a clear question. > > Suppose we have BB1 and BB2 both point to BB3. > BB1 has variable x. BB2 also as variable x. > BB3 will have PHINode for x with 2 value from BB1 and BB2. > BB1 BB2 > \ / > BB3 > > Now if BB1 and BB2 is extracted into a function > (using ExtractCodeRegion), they will be replaced by > a basic block called codeRepl (which has a call to the extracted > function). > codeRe...

...ed->getTerminator()) return false; // Delete the terminator in the predecessor block pred->getTerminator()->eraseFromParent(); // Update predecessor PHIs for (BasicBlock::iterator it = pred->begin(); it != pred->end(); ++it) { PHINode *phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(it); UT_ASSERT(phi); // Adjust the PHI to have the correct incoming block set for (pred_iterator pi = pred_begin(succ); pi != pred_end(succ); ++pi) { // We're a different predecessor than the pre...

Hi all, I have encountered the following instruction: %.0.i = phi i8* [ %9, %8 ], [ %11, %10 ] How can I get the %8 and %10? I'm using http://llvm.org/doxygen/classllvm_1_1PHINode.html as a reference but I cannot understand how to do that. Thanks -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190318/51ad402c/attachment.html>

I'm running into an error message about PHINode which I don't understand too well. Hopefully I can explain this clearly. At a high level, I'm just trying to add a fprintf() statement at the end of functions to show me a timestamp. However, I also add an if/then such that I can turn the printing on/off. When using llvm-gcc, I've...

...a single loop. >> >> llvm::MergeBlockIntoPredecessor does not do what I want since it >> requires that the the block have a unique predecessor. > > I didn't notice anything that will do what you want out-of-box, but it should not be hard to write. llvm::FoldSingleEntryPHINodes is an example of phi node replacement. But in this case, you'll need to do one in-place operand replacement for each successor phi use and call PhiNode::addIncoming for the rest. Note that multiple successor phis may use the same predecessor phi, so you should be careful of mutating the phis...

...= > --- llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCBoolRetToInt.cpp (original) > +++ llvm/trunk/lib/Target/PowerPC/PPCBoolRetToInt.cpp Mon Feb 22 07:11:58 2016 > @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ class PPCBoolRetToInt : public FunctionP > Promotable.insert(P); > > SmallVector<const PHINode *, 8> ToRemove; > - for (const auto &P : Promotable) { > + for (const PHINode *P : Promotable) { > // Condition 2 and 3 > auto IsValidUser = [] (const Value *V) -> bool { > return isa<ReturnInst>(V) || isa<CallInst>(V) || isa<PHI...

Hi, I've been writing an optimization pass (described on the ML previously). Sometimes this pass removes some case entries from switch instructions, which cause an abort because removeCase() doesn't fix the PHINodes predecessors when needed. e.g.: define i32 @foo() nounwind { ifthen: %call = call i32 @bar() switch i32 %call, label %myphi [ i32 0, label %ifelse i32 1, label %ifelse ] ifelse: br label %myphi myphi: %ret.0 = phi i32 [ 0, %ifthen ], [ 1, %ifelse ] ret i32 %ret.0 } Suppose I remo...

...Tobias Grosser <grosser at fim.uni-passau.de>wrote: > On 01/26/2011 07:50 PM, Vu Le wrote: > >> I guess I didn't have a clear question. >> >> Suppose we have BB1 and BB2 both point to BB3. >> BB1 has variable x. BB2 also as variable x. >> BB3 will have PHINode for x with 2 value from BB1 and BB2. >> BB1 BB2 >> \ / >> BB3 >> >> Now if BB1 and BB2 is extracted into a function >> (using ExtractCodeRegion), they will be replaced by >> a basic block called codeRepl (which has a call to the extracted &...

...======== RCS file: /var/cvs/llvm/llvm/lib/Transforms/Scalar/IndVarSimplify.cpp,v retrieving revision 1.78 diff -r1.78 IndVarSimplify.cpp 310c310 < runOnLoop(*I); --- > runOnLoop(LI, *I); 322,323c322,323 < void runOnLoop(Loop *L); < void EliminatePointerRecurrence(PHINode *PN, BasicBlock *Preheader, --- > void runOnLoop(LoopInfo *LI, Loop *L); > void EliminatePointerRecurrence(LoopInfo *LI, Loop *L, PHINode *PN, BasicBlock *Preheader, 361c361 < void IndVarSimplify::EliminatePointerRecurrence(PHINode *PN, --- > void IndVarSimplify::EliminatePoin...