search for: philosophi

Correct me if I''m wrong, I just want to help my friend who needs a tc solution with fairness to hosts on a 512K/s DSL line, but few of them should be restricted to 64K/s I thought about htb + esfq (sfq with ip based fairness, not connection) parent class with CEIL=500Kbit (no RULE? see *1) and attached esfq to this parent class, now child class with CEIL=64Kbit and RULE=10.0.0.1

Ok, I think I understand why RoR will flag an attempt double render in an action. What I don''t understand is the philosophy of render and redirect_to. Specifically, why isn''t a return implicit in both those methods? Or, I guess, more to the point ... what are the advantages of writing code in the action after a render/redirect_to? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --

Dear R People: Do we say that R is a programming language or a programming environment, please? Which is correct, please? Thanks in advance, Sincerely, Erin -- Erin Hodgess Associate Professor Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences University of Houston - Downtown mailto: erinm.hodgess at gmail.com

Here are three reasons for converting Fortran code, especially older Fortran code, to C: 1. The C-Fortran interface is not standardized. Various Fortran compilers pass logical and character arguments in various ways. Various Fortran compilers mangle function and common block names in variousl ways. You can avoid that problem by restricting R to using a certain Fortran compiler, but that can

Hello. This is not a question about a bug or even best practices; rather I'm trying to understand the philosophy or theory as to why certain portions of the R codebase are written as they are. If this question is better posed elsewhere, please point me in the proper direction. In the thread about the issues with the Tukey line, Martin said [1]: > when this topic came up last (for me) in

Hello, Hello Where i can found a good tutorial about Rspec ? thanks

As a perpetual Rails dabbler, I make an awful lot of typical beginner mistakes. And the logs are always either too verbose or too sparse to help me. And it started me thinking. I came from one of the largest production OLTP systems in the world, and the one thing that helped us manage troubleshooting in both development and production was extensive, obsessive, flexible logging. Every operation

Hello- I''m new to the ruby-based schemas and migrations. As I''m looking over examples and such online, I see that many of them don''t make use of schema-enforced attributes. For example, instead of: t.column "post_id", :integer, :default => 0, :null => false They do: t.column "post_id", :integer So I''m wondering -- is this

Hi, Since 4 weeks, I'm looking at the different ways to obtain the lastest wine. I want to test it and try to find problems with the poor few games i have, in order to help developers and wine development too :) But I don't really understand the differences between cvs, git and wine-patches. I think that cvs and git are the same wine "version". But for wine-patches, i

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Drew Gibson <drew at oanda.com> wrote: > > I tried out the cdp-tools some time ago (it may have been on your > recommendation, Kristian) but with no success. > Is it possible to disable CDP on the 7940 (image_version : "P0S3-08-2-00")? > > regards, > > Drew > Hmmm... I guess I'd like to know why it didn't work

I am not a graphics person. Also can't afford to hire one. Trying to follow instructions at https://docs.gimp.org/en/gimp-tutorial-quickie-separate.html I use the "intelligent scissors" just like they say, spend quite a bit of effort doing so. Then click the foreground select tool - just like they say - and suddenly everything I did with the intelligent tool is undone. WTF?

Time, not sure who owner is, but I've tried as both admin and myself, to no avail. ?However, I told you that mesg is y, buti tried to send a mesg using ?' write ' ?and it says I have messages disabled. ????? ? I did that by opening two?terminals, on I logged in as ' su ', and sent the message from there. ?Is that peculiar? Might account for why I am notgetting anything from

We are at the stage, finally, where we are prepared to deploy public facing VM guests. Now we have to answer these questions: How many guests in total should we contemplate and what services are placed on which guests? My question comes down to whether it is considered advisable to run the primary DNS and IMAP, or indeed all services, on separate vm guests; or should we continue, more or less,

On Thu, Nov 10, 2005 at 01:35:47PM -0800, Arc wrote: > > "Please don't make determination of the data format depend on > > multiple fields. Instead use an enumeration so that something > > like little endian 16 bit PCM can be specifed as OGG_PCM_LE_PCM_16 > > and big endian 64 bit doubles can be specified as OGG_PCM_BE_FLOAT_64. > >

Hi all! My first post here, so: be gentle ;-) I have been playing around with the scriptaculous library for a while now, and I must admit it is great. However, there is one thing that I''m notable to achieve: On Apple computers website for ilife (iphoto) http://www.apple.com/ilife/iphoto/ there is a verrrryyy nice fade effect going on when you click the navigation for ''new in

On 04/27/2016 12:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote: *snip* > > Unless you have a very specific requirement for a very bleeding edge > feature it's fundamentally a terrible idea to move away from the > distribution packages in something as exposed as a webserver ... I use to believe that. However I no longer. First of all, advancements in TLS happen too quickly. The RHEL philosophy of

On Aug 4, 2009, at 12:19 AM, Alireza.Moshtaghi at microchip.com wrote: > Well, for one thing, our port has no native operation other than 8-bit > so it does not make sense to promote operations to higher precisions. > Eventually all those operations will be lowered and the resulting code > is most likely worse than if it was not promoted in the first place. > So > I think it

> Anyway, a spec for Markdown Extra would contain a spec for Markdown as > well, wouldn't it? I think the whole enterprise would be a lot more valuable, if we produce a combined spec, which would be self-contained, and call it Markdown 2.0. I don't think we necessarily need a formal grammar. What we need is to create a document, starting with "Markdown Syntax" perhaps,

Hi, I currently have some systems on AsteriskNOW 1.7 & have been happy with its clean simplicity & reliability. Are many people here using AsteriskNOW 2.0.x? How do you feel about it? Did Digium stick with their previous philosophy of keeping everything very vanilla & making it clean & simple for someone who understands how to manage CentOS, FreePBX, tftp, ntpd, etc. but

...ndle all the possibilities. It *feels* like it belongs in the controller. I could remove some code into partials and helpers, but that''s really just distributing the ugliness around. On the other hand, using a controller to build an array of html links doesn''t seem right either. Philosophically, which way should I go? -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYP...