Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pgccfd".
Did you mean:
gccld
2009 Apr 13
0
[LLVMdev] Porting LLVM backend is no fun yet
...erstanding of Target
classes is mandatory before proceeding to use TableGen.
I guess what would help would be a tutorial that shows how one goes
about writing a back-end for a fictitious target machine - something
similar to "Porting GCC for Dunces" (http://ftp.axis.se/pub/users/hp/pgccfd/pgccfd.pdf
). Also a pre-made "Dummy" back-end that had some basic instructions
would also go a long way in helping someone write a back-end.
Alex Karahalios
On Apr 11, 2009, at 5:03 PM, Greg McGary wrote:
> As we've already seen, David Chisnall prefers hacking LLVM over GCC...
2009 Apr 12
9
[LLVMdev] Porting LLVM backend is no fun yet
As we've already seen, David Chisnall prefers hacking LLVM over GCC (see
http://www.informit.com/articles/article.aspx?p=1215438): "In contrast,
every time I look at the GCC code, it takes two people to
prevent me from clawing my eyeballs out."
I'm sorry to report that so-far I have had the opposite experience.
Some years ago, I ported binutils (via CGEN) and GCC to an
2009 Apr 13
1
[LLVMdev] Porting LLVM backend is no fun yet
...#39;s quite questionable whether it will be better than C++ :)
> I guess what would help would be a tutorial that shows how one goes about
> writing a back-end for a fictitious target machine - something similar to
> "Porting GCC for Dunces"
> (http://ftp.axis.se/pub/users/hp/pgccfd/pgccfd.pdf). Also
> a pre-made "Dummy" back-end that had some basic instructions would also go a
> long way in helping someone write a back-end.
Recently on the horizont appeared some group of enthusiasts willing to
write MSP430 backend. I'm trying to make their learning curve l...