Displaying 15 results from an estimated 15 matches for "pg_privat".
Did you mean:
pg_private
2022 Jul 08
0
[PATCH v2 07/19] mm/migrate: Convert expected_page_refs() to folio_expected_refs()
...ht get silent data corruption too.
>
> I assumed at first that you'd changed the rules, and were now expecting
> any subsystem that puts a non-zero value into folio->private to raise
> its refcount - whereas the old convention (originating with buffer heads)
> is that setting PG_private says an extra refcount has been taken, please
> call try_to_release_page() to lower it, and maybe that will use data in
> page->private to do so; but page->private free for the subsystem owning
> the page to use as it wishes, no refcount implication. But that you
> had missed up...
2022 Jul 08
0
[PATCH v2 07/19] mm/migrate: Convert expected_page_refs() to folio_expected_refs()
...ht get silent data corruption too.
>
> I assumed at first that you'd changed the rules, and were now expecting
> any subsystem that puts a non-zero value into folio->private to raise
> its refcount - whereas the old convention (originating with buffer heads)
> is that setting PG_private says an extra refcount has been taken, please
> call try_to_release_page() to lower it, and maybe that will use data in
> page->private to do so; but page->private free for the subsystem owning
> the page to use as it wishes, no refcount implication. But that you
> had missed up...
2016 May 16
1
[PATCH v5 02/12] mm: migrate: support non-lru movable page migration
...or CONFIG_COMPACTION.
can we have stub declarations of movable functions for !CONFIG_MIGRATION builds?
otherwise the users (zsmalloc, for example) have to do things like
static void reset_page(struct page *page)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
__ClearPageMovable(page);
#endif
clear_bit(PG_private, &page->flags);
clear_bit(PG_private_2, &page->flags);
set_page_private(page, 0);
ClearPageHugeObject(page);
page->freelist = NULL;
}
-ss
2016 May 16
1
[PATCH v5 02/12] mm: migrate: support non-lru movable page migration
...or CONFIG_COMPACTION.
can we have stub declarations of movable functions for !CONFIG_MIGRATION builds?
otherwise the users (zsmalloc, for example) have to do things like
static void reset_page(struct page *page)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_COMPACTION
__ClearPageMovable(page);
#endif
clear_bit(PG_private, &page->flags);
clear_bit(PG_private_2, &page->flags);
set_page_private(page, 0);
ClearPageHugeObject(page);
page->freelist = NULL;
}
-ss
2016 Mar 30
0
[PATCH v3 09/16] zsmalloc: move struct zs_meta from mapping to freelist
...@
* Look at size_class->huge.
* page->lru: links together first pages of various zspages.
* Basically forming list of zspages in a fullness group.
- * page->mapping: override by struct zs_meta
+ * page->freelist: override by struct zs_meta
*
* Usage of struct page flags:
* PG_private: identifies the first component page
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@ static int get_zspage_inuse(struct page *first_page)
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!is_first_page(first_page), first_page);
- m = (struct zs_meta *)&first_page->mapping;
+ m = (struct zs_meta *)&first_page->freelist;
return m->in...
2016 Mar 30
0
[PATCH v3 06/16] zsmalloc: squeeze inuse into page->mapping
...ous zspages.
* Basically forming list of zspages in a fullness group.
- * page->mapping: class index and fullness group of the zspage
- * page->inuse: the number of objects that are used in this zspage
+ * page->mapping: override by struct zs_meta
*
* Usage of struct page flags:
* PG_private: identifies the first component page
@@ -132,6 +131,13 @@
/* each chunk includes extra space to keep handle */
#define ZS_MAX_ALLOC_SIZE PAGE_SIZE
+#define CLASS_BITS 8
+#define CLASS_MASK ((1 << CLASS_BITS) - 1)
+#define FULLNESS_BITS 2
+#define FULLNESS_MASK ((1 << FULLNESS_BITS)...
2016 Mar 30
33
[PATCH v3 00/16] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation
in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on)
and failed to fork easily.
The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver
pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot
work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working
set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork
easily.
2016 Mar 30
33
[PATCH v3 00/16] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation
in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on)
and failed to fork easily.
The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver
pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot
work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working
set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork
easily.
2016 Mar 11
31
[PATCH v1 00/19] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation
in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on)
and failed to fork easily.
The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver
pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot
work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working
set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork
easily.
2016 Mar 11
31
[PATCH v1 00/19] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation
in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on)
and failed to fork easily.
The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver
pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot
work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working
set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork
easily.
2016 Mar 21
22
[PATCH v2 00/18] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation
in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on)
and failed to fork easily.
The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver
pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot
work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working
set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork
easily.
2016 Mar 21
22
[PATCH v2 00/18] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation
in embedded system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on)
and failed to fork easily.
The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver
pages. Their pages cannot be migrated so compaction cannot
work well, either so reclaimer ends up shrinking all of working
set pages. It made system very slow and even to fail to fork
easily.
2016 May 09
5
[PATCH v5 00/13] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded
system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and easy fork fail.
The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver mainly.
With memory pressure, their pages were spread out all of pageblock and
it cannot be migrated with current compaction algorithm which supports
only LRU pages. In the end, compaction cannot
2016 May 09
5
[PATCH v5 00/13] Support non-lru page migration
Recently, I got many reports about perfermance degradation in embedded
system(Android mobile phone, webOS TV and so on) and easy fork fail.
The problem was fragmentation caused by zram and GPU driver mainly.
With memory pressure, their pages were spread out all of pageblock and
it cannot be migrated with current compaction algorithm which supports
only LRU pages. In the end, compaction cannot
2006 Jul 26
5
linux-2.6-xen.hg
Hi,
Is the http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6-xen.hg tree still being
updated? if not, what''s the preferred Linux tree to track that has all
of the Xen bits?
Thanks,
Muli
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel