Displaying 3 results from an estimated 3 matches for "pfmeter2".
Did you mean:
pfmeter
2004 Oct 06
0
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
...It looks like an
interesting suite of benchmarks, similar in design to oopack.
Unfortunately, it does not compile with LLVM (or GCC 3.4), as the source
is not compliant with two phase name lookup. I get errors such as:
$ llvmg++ -O3 -I. -DOPT_LEVEL=-1 -W -Wall -c pfmeter.cpp
In file included from pfmeter2.h:50,
from pfmeter.cpp:44:
pfmeter.h: In destructor `ClassPerfoMeter<T1, T2,
T3>::~ClassPerfoMeter()':
pfmeter.h:620: error: there are no arguments to
`check_state_resource_values' that depend on a template parameter, so a
declaration of `check_state_resource_values...
2004 Oct 06
1
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
...ting suite of benchmarks, similar in design to oopack.
> Unfortunately, it does not compile with LLVM (or GCC 3.4), as the source
> is not compliant with two phase name lookup. I get errors such as:
>
> $ llvmg++ -O3 -I. -DOPT_LEVEL=-1 -W -Wall -c pfmeter.cpp
> In file included from pfmeter2.h:50,
> from pfmeter.cpp:44:
> pfmeter.h: In destructor `ClassPerfoMeter<T1, T2,
> T3>::~ClassPerfoMeter()':
> pfmeter.h:620: error: there are no arguments to
> `check_state_resource_values' that depend on a template parameter, so a
> declaration of...
2004 Oct 06
3
[LLVMdev] Re: Starting with LLVM-GCC on Cygwin
"Chris Lattner" <sabre at nondot.org> wrote in message news:Pine.LNX.4.44.0410051204480.5863-100000 at nondot.org...
> On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote:
>
> > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers.
> > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at
> >