search for: pfaffe

Hi, Last week, while trying to compile IceCast2 from CVS on several Debian machines (sid, woody, sarge), I encountered a problem where autoconf told me to file a bug report, which I did with Debian's reportbug utility. here's the answer from Ben Pfaff, who's in charge of Autoconf at Debian, which you may find interesting to read. hth. bye, PS: I've not tested his suggestion

Help! (pretty please :) I'm still having the problem described below with samba-3.0.24. Here's an excerpt from the smbpasswd man page: When run by an ordinary user with no options, smbpasswd will prompt them for their old SMB password and then ask them for their new pass word twice, to ensure that the new password was typed correctly. No passwords will be

We've recently started using samba-3.0.23d on Mandriva 2007.0 linux systems and we've noticed a change in behaviour of smbpasswd when a non-root user tries to change their password from "NO PASSWORD". Here's an example smbpasswd entry (all one line): testuser:12345:NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX: NO PASSWORDXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:[NU ]:LCT-00000000: The

Dear R-Devel subscriber, first, let me express my thank to the R-Core team for the new release! I appreciate their efforts and time spent to enhance R. In accordance with the 'NEWS' file (see excerpt of it below), [... o Changed the environment tree to be rooted in an empty environment, available as emptyenv(). baseenv() has been modified to return an environment with emptyenv() as

Dear R-Devel subscriber, first, let me express my thank to the R-Core team for the new release! I appreciate their efforts and time spent to enhance R. In accordance with the 'NEWS' file (see excerpt of it below), [... o Changed the environment tree to be rooted in an empty environment, available as emptyenv(). baseenv() has been modified to return an environment with emptyenv() as

+ Vedant: what do you think about the last point, since Debugify is also related? Son Tuan Vu On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Son, > > PassManagerBuilder is used to populate legacy PassManagers. That role is > taken over by PassBuilder for new-PM passes. > > Cheers, > Philip > > 2018-04-18 13:40 GMT+02:00 Son Tuan VU <sontuan.vu119 at gmail.com...

...M really become default? I would at least like to see a plan of how Codegen is going to migrate before the new PM becomes default. Codegen pass pipelines have been wonky ever since I started working with LLVM and it would be nice to get that cleaned up. -David Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> writes: > Well, I think we don't have a clear idea about new-PM codegen should > work in general. Is this really something that concerns us right now? > > Philip > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 7:54 PM Friedman, Eli > <efriedma at codeauro...

I have a problem with 2.0.5 that did not happen in 2.0.4b or previous releases. I am seeing thousands of these messages in log.smb: [1999/07/20 23:44:24, 0] lib/util_str.c:string_sub(1095) ERROR: string overflow by 7 in string_sub(%M, 967) and the smbd process seems to be stuck in a tight loop. It's caused by the variable substitutions in these lines from smb.conf: root preexec = [ %U

if i have a host with a particular ip address running as a domain master browser and registered as such with my wins server, and then i change the ip address of this host, does the old registration with the wins server eventually go away so that the new ip address can be registered? if so, how long should this take? how would one force the old ip address to be forgotten? -- Todd Pfaff

...can even replace print-after-all option with apply-after-each=PrintModulePassWrapper for example? Speaking for myself, I'd rather type "opt -foo-each" over "opt -apply-after-each=foo". best, vedant > > Son Tuan Vu > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com <mailto:philip.pfaffe at gmail.com>> wrote: > Hi Son, > > PassManagerBuilder is used to populate legacy PassManagers. That role is taken over by PassBuilder for new-PM passes. > > Cheers, > Philip > > 2018-04-18 13:40 GMT+02:00 Son...

...ore intuitive, but if someone ever wants to apply foo after each pass, she will have to hack into opt and write her own custom PassManager. Or maybe this situation is not likely to happen? > > best, > vedant > > > > Son Tuan Vu > > On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Son, >> >> PassManagerBuilder is used to populate legacy PassManagers. That role is >> taken over by PassBuilder for new-PM passes. >> >> Cheers, >> Philip >> >> 2018-04-18 13:40 GMT+02:...

...reds = %7* * %14 = add i32 %.0, 1* * br label %4* *; <label>:15: ; preds = %4* * ret void* *}* Can you please check whether the anti dependeces that you get are loop-carried or loop-independent? Thanks, - Stan On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 7:21 PM, Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Stan, > > can you share your example.bc? Can you reproduce your issue with llvm 4.0 > or, better even, trunk? > > Cheers, > Philip > > 2017-06-21 18:58 GMT+02:00 Stanislav Manilov <stanislav.manilov at gmail.com> >...

anyone running samba-2.0.5a on a solaris 7 5/99 system and noticed this problem? this samba was built on a solaris 2.5 system and was running fine on a solaris 7 3/99 system. when i installed the solaris 7 5/99 maintenance update something broke. log.smb: [1999/08/06 11:04:41, 1] smbd/server.c:main(628) smbd version 2.0.5a started. Copyright Andrew Tridgell 1992-1998 [1999/08/06 11:36:49,

...nk you for your reply. So what would be the right way/API to write out-of-tree pass? I've been using *PassManagerBuilder*, which requires a callback refering to *legacy::PassManagerBase*, so I guess this will be no longer the good way to go? Son Tuan Vu On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Son, > > I have an answer to your first question: > > 1, What are the differences between *LegacyPassManager* and *PassManager*? >> I see that *opt* uses the former most of the times while the latter is >> used via *PassBuil...

On 9/26/2018 10:47 AM, Philip Pfaffe via llvm-dev wrote: > Hi Fedor, > > can you make an example where a pass actually needs to opt-out? > Because IMO, bisect should quite literally to DebugCounter-style skip > every step in every ::run method's loop. Passes should not even be > concerned with this. This isn&...

...to hack into opt and write her own custom PassManager. Or maybe this situation is not likely to happen? This doesn't seem like a common scenario to me. vedant > > best, > vedant > > >> >> Son Tuan Vu >> >> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 6:14 PM, Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com <mailto:philip.pfaffe at gmail.com>> wrote: >> Hi Son, >> >> PassManagerBuilder is used to populate legacy PassManagers. That role is taken over by PassBuilder for new-PM passes. >> >> Cheers, >> Philip >> >&gt...

...uld be the right way/API to write > out-of-tree pass? I've been using *PassManagerBuilder*, which requires a > callback refering to *legacy::PassManagerBase*, so I guess this will be > no longer the good way to go? > > Son Tuan Vu > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:06 PM, Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi Son, >> >> I have an answer to your first question: >> >> 1, What are the differences between *LegacyPassManager* and *PassManager*? >>> I see that *opt* uses the former most of the times while the latt...

...e a plan of how Codegen is going to migrate before the new PM becomes >> default. Codegen pass pipelines have been wonky ever since I started >> working with LLVM and it would be nice to get that cleaned up. >> >> -David >> >> Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe at gmail.com> writes: >> >>> Well, I think we don't have a clear idea about new-PM codegen should >>> work in general. Is this really something that concerns us right now? >>> >>> Philip >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 26, 201...

I've encountered a new problem building gluster-2.0.1 that I did not have with gluster-2.0.0rc8. This is on a mandriva-2008.1-x86_64 system. ../../libtool: line 466: CDPATH: command not found ../../libtool: line 1144: func_opt_split: command not found libtool: Version mismatch error. This is libtool 2.2.6 Debian-2.2.6a-4, but the libtool: definition of this LT_INIT comes from an older

Hi all, Suppose I have 100 simultaneous time series, what's the best statistical procedure to figure out a transformation of the data, and see if we could squeeze most of the information into a few transformed time series? Thanks!